Evaluation of synthetic reticular hybrid meshes designed for intraperitoneal abdominal wall repair: Preclinical and in vitro behavior.

INTRODUCTION:Reticular hybrid meshes represent an alternative material for intraperitoneal repair of abdominal hernias. These consist of a reticular mesh coated or interwoven/knitted with inert materials. This study assesses the performance of two reticular polypropylene-containing hybrid meshes, Ti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Verónica Gómez-Gil, Marta Rodríguez, Francisca García-Moreno Nisa, Bárbara Pérez-Köhler, Gemma Pascual
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2019-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213005
id doaj-9deaa6a80e0f416291b3810e3e02ffb0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9deaa6a80e0f416291b3810e3e02ffb02021-03-03T20:51:21ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032019-01-01142e021300510.1371/journal.pone.0213005Evaluation of synthetic reticular hybrid meshes designed for intraperitoneal abdominal wall repair: Preclinical and in vitro behavior.Verónica Gómez-GilMarta RodríguezFrancisca García-Moreno NisaFrancisca García-Moreno NisaBárbara Pérez-KöhlerGemma PascualINTRODUCTION:Reticular hybrid meshes represent an alternative material for intraperitoneal repair of abdominal hernias. These consist of a reticular mesh coated or interwoven/knitted with inert materials. This study assesses the performance of two reticular polypropylene-containing hybrid meshes, TiMESH (coated with titanium) and DynaMesh (interwoven with polyvinylidene fluoride), in vitro, as well as their efficiency in adhesion prevention and tissue incorporation in an intraperitoneal model. METHODS:The mesothelialization capacity of TiMESH and DynaMesh was evaluated in vitro and compared to that of Surgipro (reticular bare polypropylene) and Preclude (laminar expanded polytetrafluoroethylene). Mesh fragments were placed on the intact parietal peritoneum of New Zealand white rabbits (n = 24), and laparoscopy performed 7 days post-surgery. Fourteen days post-implantation, adhesions were evaluated and host tissue incorporation, macrophage response, collagen expression (immunohistochemistry/RT-PCR) and neoperitoneum formation assessed. Adhesions and omental tissue were also examined. RESULTS:Mesh pores in reticular meshes were devoid of cells in the in vitro study. TiMESH, DynaMesh and Surgipro showed similar adhesion rates at 7/14 days and optimal tissue integration, with significant differences in comparison to Preclude. The greatest presence of macrophages was observed for TiMESH and was significant versus that for Preclude. Hybrid meshes revealed significantly higher collagen 1 mRNA expression in implants, with no differences in the levels of collagen 3. Omental samples from animals with a reticular mesh showed significantly greater collagen 1 mRNA levels. CONCLUSIONS:The reticular structure of a mesh limits the formation of a continuous mesothelial monolayer in vitro, regardless of its composition. The presence of titanium as a coating or polyvinylidene fluoride interwoven with polypropylene in a reticular structure did not prevent adhesions. The hybrid meshes showed proper integration and an increase in the mRNA Col 1 levels in the implant area compared to Surgipro or Preclude.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213005
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Verónica Gómez-Gil
Marta Rodríguez
Francisca García-Moreno Nisa
Francisca García-Moreno Nisa
Bárbara Pérez-Köhler
Gemma Pascual
spellingShingle Verónica Gómez-Gil
Marta Rodríguez
Francisca García-Moreno Nisa
Francisca García-Moreno Nisa
Bárbara Pérez-Köhler
Gemma Pascual
Evaluation of synthetic reticular hybrid meshes designed for intraperitoneal abdominal wall repair: Preclinical and in vitro behavior.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Verónica Gómez-Gil
Marta Rodríguez
Francisca García-Moreno Nisa
Francisca García-Moreno Nisa
Bárbara Pérez-Köhler
Gemma Pascual
author_sort Verónica Gómez-Gil
title Evaluation of synthetic reticular hybrid meshes designed for intraperitoneal abdominal wall repair: Preclinical and in vitro behavior.
title_short Evaluation of synthetic reticular hybrid meshes designed for intraperitoneal abdominal wall repair: Preclinical and in vitro behavior.
title_full Evaluation of synthetic reticular hybrid meshes designed for intraperitoneal abdominal wall repair: Preclinical and in vitro behavior.
title_fullStr Evaluation of synthetic reticular hybrid meshes designed for intraperitoneal abdominal wall repair: Preclinical and in vitro behavior.
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of synthetic reticular hybrid meshes designed for intraperitoneal abdominal wall repair: Preclinical and in vitro behavior.
title_sort evaluation of synthetic reticular hybrid meshes designed for intraperitoneal abdominal wall repair: preclinical and in vitro behavior.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2019-01-01
description INTRODUCTION:Reticular hybrid meshes represent an alternative material for intraperitoneal repair of abdominal hernias. These consist of a reticular mesh coated or interwoven/knitted with inert materials. This study assesses the performance of two reticular polypropylene-containing hybrid meshes, TiMESH (coated with titanium) and DynaMesh (interwoven with polyvinylidene fluoride), in vitro, as well as their efficiency in adhesion prevention and tissue incorporation in an intraperitoneal model. METHODS:The mesothelialization capacity of TiMESH and DynaMesh was evaluated in vitro and compared to that of Surgipro (reticular bare polypropylene) and Preclude (laminar expanded polytetrafluoroethylene). Mesh fragments were placed on the intact parietal peritoneum of New Zealand white rabbits (n = 24), and laparoscopy performed 7 days post-surgery. Fourteen days post-implantation, adhesions were evaluated and host tissue incorporation, macrophage response, collagen expression (immunohistochemistry/RT-PCR) and neoperitoneum formation assessed. Adhesions and omental tissue were also examined. RESULTS:Mesh pores in reticular meshes were devoid of cells in the in vitro study. TiMESH, DynaMesh and Surgipro showed similar adhesion rates at 7/14 days and optimal tissue integration, with significant differences in comparison to Preclude. The greatest presence of macrophages was observed for TiMESH and was significant versus that for Preclude. Hybrid meshes revealed significantly higher collagen 1 mRNA expression in implants, with no differences in the levels of collagen 3. Omental samples from animals with a reticular mesh showed significantly greater collagen 1 mRNA levels. CONCLUSIONS:The reticular structure of a mesh limits the formation of a continuous mesothelial monolayer in vitro, regardless of its composition. The presence of titanium as a coating or polyvinylidene fluoride interwoven with polypropylene in a reticular structure did not prevent adhesions. The hybrid meshes showed proper integration and an increase in the mRNA Col 1 levels in the implant area compared to Surgipro or Preclude.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213005
work_keys_str_mv AT veronicagomezgil evaluationofsyntheticreticularhybridmeshesdesignedforintraperitonealabdominalwallrepairpreclinicalandinvitrobehavior
AT martarodriguez evaluationofsyntheticreticularhybridmeshesdesignedforintraperitonealabdominalwallrepairpreclinicalandinvitrobehavior
AT franciscagarciamorenonisa evaluationofsyntheticreticularhybridmeshesdesignedforintraperitonealabdominalwallrepairpreclinicalandinvitrobehavior
AT franciscagarciamorenonisa evaluationofsyntheticreticularhybridmeshesdesignedforintraperitonealabdominalwallrepairpreclinicalandinvitrobehavior
AT barbaraperezkohler evaluationofsyntheticreticularhybridmeshesdesignedforintraperitonealabdominalwallrepairpreclinicalandinvitrobehavior
AT gemmapascual evaluationofsyntheticreticularhybridmeshesdesignedforintraperitonealabdominalwallrepairpreclinicalandinvitrobehavior
_version_ 1714820157646307328