Comparing enzyme activity modifier equations through the development of global data fitting templates in Excel

The classical way of defining enzyme inhibition has obscured the distinction between inhibitory effect and the inhibitor binding constant. This article examines the relationship between the simple binding curve used to define biomolecular interactions and the standard inhibitory term (1 + ([I]∕Ki))....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ryan Walsh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PeerJ Inc. 2018-12-01
Series:PeerJ
Subjects:
Online Access:https://peerj.com/articles/6082.pdf
id doaj-9ddfdb7197094445b367721dad3bd890
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9ddfdb7197094445b367721dad3bd8902020-11-24T21:13:35ZengPeerJ Inc.PeerJ2167-83592018-12-016e608210.7717/peerj.6082Comparing enzyme activity modifier equations through the development of global data fitting templates in ExcelRyan Walsh0Microbiology/Biochemistry, INRS–Institut Armand-Frappier, Laval, Quebec, CanadaThe classical way of defining enzyme inhibition has obscured the distinction between inhibitory effect and the inhibitor binding constant. This article examines the relationship between the simple binding curve used to define biomolecular interactions and the standard inhibitory term (1 + ([I]∕Ki)). By understanding how this term relates to binding curves which are ubiquitously used to describe biological processes, a modifier equation which distinguishes between inhibitor binding and the inhibitory effect, is examined. This modifier equation which can describe both activation and inhibition is compared to standard inhibitory equations with the development of global data fitting templates in Excel and via the global fitting of these equations to simulated and previously published datasets. In both cases, this modifier equation was able to match or outperform the other equations by providing superior fits to the datasets. The ability of this single equation to outperform the other equations suggests an over-complication of the field. This equation and the template developed in this article should prove to be useful tools in the study of enzyme inhibition and activation.https://peerj.com/articles/6082.pdfEnzyme inhibitionEnzyme activationGlobal data fittingModel comparisonDrug developmentInhibition constant
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ryan Walsh
spellingShingle Ryan Walsh
Comparing enzyme activity modifier equations through the development of global data fitting templates in Excel
PeerJ
Enzyme inhibition
Enzyme activation
Global data fitting
Model comparison
Drug development
Inhibition constant
author_facet Ryan Walsh
author_sort Ryan Walsh
title Comparing enzyme activity modifier equations through the development of global data fitting templates in Excel
title_short Comparing enzyme activity modifier equations through the development of global data fitting templates in Excel
title_full Comparing enzyme activity modifier equations through the development of global data fitting templates in Excel
title_fullStr Comparing enzyme activity modifier equations through the development of global data fitting templates in Excel
title_full_unstemmed Comparing enzyme activity modifier equations through the development of global data fitting templates in Excel
title_sort comparing enzyme activity modifier equations through the development of global data fitting templates in excel
publisher PeerJ Inc.
series PeerJ
issn 2167-8359
publishDate 2018-12-01
description The classical way of defining enzyme inhibition has obscured the distinction between inhibitory effect and the inhibitor binding constant. This article examines the relationship between the simple binding curve used to define biomolecular interactions and the standard inhibitory term (1 + ([I]∕Ki)). By understanding how this term relates to binding curves which are ubiquitously used to describe biological processes, a modifier equation which distinguishes between inhibitor binding and the inhibitory effect, is examined. This modifier equation which can describe both activation and inhibition is compared to standard inhibitory equations with the development of global data fitting templates in Excel and via the global fitting of these equations to simulated and previously published datasets. In both cases, this modifier equation was able to match or outperform the other equations by providing superior fits to the datasets. The ability of this single equation to outperform the other equations suggests an over-complication of the field. This equation and the template developed in this article should prove to be useful tools in the study of enzyme inhibition and activation.
topic Enzyme inhibition
Enzyme activation
Global data fitting
Model comparison
Drug development
Inhibition constant
url https://peerj.com/articles/6082.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT ryanwalsh comparingenzymeactivitymodifierequationsthroughthedevelopmentofglobaldatafittingtemplatesinexcel
_version_ 1716748728586469376