Does ampullary adenoma size predict invasion on EUS? Does invasion on EUS predict presence of malignancy?

Background and study aims: It is common practice to perform ampullectomy without endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) for ampullary lesions < 1 cm but no data exists to support it. No studies have explored whether EUS findings of invasion correla...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vaishali Patel, Paul Jowell, Jorge Obando, Cynthia D. Guy, Rebecca A. Burbridge
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2016-12-01
Series:Endoscopy International Open
Online Access:http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0042-121001
id doaj-9dc8294568fd4b9d89a0cf9adbc08c6b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9dc8294568fd4b9d89a0cf9adbc08c6b2020-11-25T02:55:03ZengGeorg Thieme Verlag KGEndoscopy International Open2364-37222196-97362016-12-010412E1313E131810.1055/s-0042-121001Does ampullary adenoma size predict invasion on EUS? Does invasion on EUS predict presence of malignancy?Vaishali Patel0Paul Jowell1Jorge Obando2Cynthia D. Guy3Rebecca A. Burbridge4Division of Gastroenterology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United StatesDivision of Gastroenterology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United StatesDivision of Gastroenterology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United StatesDivision of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United StatesDivision of Gastroenterology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United StatesBackground and study aims: It is common practice to perform ampullectomy without endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) for ampullary lesions < 1 cm but no data exists to support it. No studies have explored whether EUS findings of invasion correlate with malignancy or high-grade dysplasia (HGD) on pathology. We explored the association between adenoma size, pathology results, and invasion on EUS.  Patients and methods: This was a single-center retrospective cohort study at a large tertiary care academic hospital. Chart review was performed for 161 patients with benign ampullary lesions on endoscopic biopsy (identified by pathology records). The primary outcomes were mean size (mm) of adenomas and pathology findings with and without intraductal and/or duodenal wall invasion on EUS.  Results: Invasion was identified by EUS in 41 (34.1 %) of 120 patients who underwent EUS. The mean size of the lesion in these patients was 20.9 mm (± 11.6 mm) compared to 13.9 mm (± 11.3 mm, P = 0.0001) in patients without invasion. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC 0.73, 95 % CI 0.63 – 0.83) revealed 100 % sensitivity for absence of invasion on EUS in lesions less than 6.5 mm. Invasion on EUS had sensitivity of 63.0 % (95 % CI 47.0 % – 77.0 %) and specificity 88.0 % (95 % CI 78.0 % – 95.0 %) for presence of malignancy, HGD or invasion on pathology. Conclusions: EUS should be considered for ampullary lesions > 6.5 mm. This study provides evidence to support the practice of ampullectomy without EUS for smaller adenomas. EUS evidence of invasion is highly specific for pathologic malignancy, HGD, or invasion (which preclude endoscopic ampullectomy).http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0042-121001
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Vaishali Patel
Paul Jowell
Jorge Obando
Cynthia D. Guy
Rebecca A. Burbridge
spellingShingle Vaishali Patel
Paul Jowell
Jorge Obando
Cynthia D. Guy
Rebecca A. Burbridge
Does ampullary adenoma size predict invasion on EUS? Does invasion on EUS predict presence of malignancy?
Endoscopy International Open
author_facet Vaishali Patel
Paul Jowell
Jorge Obando
Cynthia D. Guy
Rebecca A. Burbridge
author_sort Vaishali Patel
title Does ampullary adenoma size predict invasion on EUS? Does invasion on EUS predict presence of malignancy?
title_short Does ampullary adenoma size predict invasion on EUS? Does invasion on EUS predict presence of malignancy?
title_full Does ampullary adenoma size predict invasion on EUS? Does invasion on EUS predict presence of malignancy?
title_fullStr Does ampullary adenoma size predict invasion on EUS? Does invasion on EUS predict presence of malignancy?
title_full_unstemmed Does ampullary adenoma size predict invasion on EUS? Does invasion on EUS predict presence of malignancy?
title_sort does ampullary adenoma size predict invasion on eus? does invasion on eus predict presence of malignancy?
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
series Endoscopy International Open
issn 2364-3722
2196-9736
publishDate 2016-12-01
description Background and study aims: It is common practice to perform ampullectomy without endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) for ampullary lesions < 1 cm but no data exists to support it. No studies have explored whether EUS findings of invasion correlate with malignancy or high-grade dysplasia (HGD) on pathology. We explored the association between adenoma size, pathology results, and invasion on EUS.  Patients and methods: This was a single-center retrospective cohort study at a large tertiary care academic hospital. Chart review was performed for 161 patients with benign ampullary lesions on endoscopic biopsy (identified by pathology records). The primary outcomes were mean size (mm) of adenomas and pathology findings with and without intraductal and/or duodenal wall invasion on EUS.  Results: Invasion was identified by EUS in 41 (34.1 %) of 120 patients who underwent EUS. The mean size of the lesion in these patients was 20.9 mm (± 11.6 mm) compared to 13.9 mm (± 11.3 mm, P = 0.0001) in patients without invasion. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC 0.73, 95 % CI 0.63 – 0.83) revealed 100 % sensitivity for absence of invasion on EUS in lesions less than 6.5 mm. Invasion on EUS had sensitivity of 63.0 % (95 % CI 47.0 % – 77.0 %) and specificity 88.0 % (95 % CI 78.0 % – 95.0 %) for presence of malignancy, HGD or invasion on pathology. Conclusions: EUS should be considered for ampullary lesions > 6.5 mm. This study provides evidence to support the practice of ampullectomy without EUS for smaller adenomas. EUS evidence of invasion is highly specific for pathologic malignancy, HGD, or invasion (which preclude endoscopic ampullectomy).
url http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0042-121001
work_keys_str_mv AT vaishalipatel doesampullaryadenomasizepredictinvasiononeusdoesinvasiononeuspredictpresenceofmalignancy
AT pauljowell doesampullaryadenomasizepredictinvasiononeusdoesinvasiononeuspredictpresenceofmalignancy
AT jorgeobando doesampullaryadenomasizepredictinvasiononeusdoesinvasiononeuspredictpresenceofmalignancy
AT cynthiadguy doesampullaryadenomasizepredictinvasiononeusdoesinvasiononeuspredictpresenceofmalignancy
AT rebeccaaburbridge doesampullaryadenomasizepredictinvasiononeusdoesinvasiononeuspredictpresenceofmalignancy
_version_ 1724718479804727296