Comparative physico-chemical, proximate and mineral analysis on raw and roasted seeds of groundnut

Physico-chemical, proximate and nutritionally valuable minerals were determined aiming to compare raw and roasted groundnut seeds. The results indicated that total ash content of raw groundnut (4.6%) was higher than the roasted groundnut (4.1%) seeds. Crude protein content of roasted groundnut was h...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bhanu Saravan Kumar, Sadagopan Ravi Shankar, Raguru Pandu Vasanthi, Kalapati Vishnuvardhan, Mabbu Purushotham
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Communications in Plant Sciences 2013-10-01
Series:Communications in Plant Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://complantsci.files.wordpress.com/2013/10/complantsci_3_1_7.pdf
id doaj-9dc256ac2fbe425d8e207a294e09094d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9dc256ac2fbe425d8e207a294e09094d2020-11-24T22:15:42ZengCommunications in Plant SciencesCommunications in Plant Sciences2237-40272237-40272013-10-0133-42529Comparative physico-chemical, proximate and mineral analysis on raw and roasted seeds of groundnutBhanu Saravan KumarSadagopan Ravi ShankarRaguru Pandu VasanthiKalapati VishnuvardhanMabbu PurushothamPhysico-chemical, proximate and nutritionally valuable minerals were determined aiming to compare raw and roasted groundnut seeds. The results indicated that total ash content of raw groundnut (4.6%) was higher than the roasted groundnut (4.1%) seeds. Crude protein content of roasted groundnut was higher (26.1%) when compared to that of raw groundnut (24.9%). Crude carbohydrates levels of raw groundnut (25.3%) are lower when compared with that of roasted groundnut (26.5%). Crude fat ranged from 39.1% in raw groundnut to 39.6% in roasted groundnut. Crude fiber percentage both in raw (2.9%) and roasted (3.1%) conditions were good. The moisture content of the raw groundnut (4.1%) was more than the roasted groundnut (3.6%) because of not exposure to heat. Seeds showed higher energy values both in raw and roasted conditions. Significant amount of minerals like potassium, calcium, magnesium, phosphorus, and zinc were present both in raw and roasted conditions. Based on statistical analysis the results showed highly significant differences (P < 0.05) between the raw and roasted seeds.http://complantsci.files.wordpress.com/2013/10/complantsci_3_1_7.pdfArachis hypogaeaproximatemineral analysisseed quality
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Bhanu Saravan Kumar
Sadagopan Ravi Shankar
Raguru Pandu Vasanthi
Kalapati Vishnuvardhan
Mabbu Purushotham
spellingShingle Bhanu Saravan Kumar
Sadagopan Ravi Shankar
Raguru Pandu Vasanthi
Kalapati Vishnuvardhan
Mabbu Purushotham
Comparative physico-chemical, proximate and mineral analysis on raw and roasted seeds of groundnut
Communications in Plant Sciences
Arachis hypogaea
proximate
mineral analysis
seed quality
author_facet Bhanu Saravan Kumar
Sadagopan Ravi Shankar
Raguru Pandu Vasanthi
Kalapati Vishnuvardhan
Mabbu Purushotham
author_sort Bhanu Saravan Kumar
title Comparative physico-chemical, proximate and mineral analysis on raw and roasted seeds of groundnut
title_short Comparative physico-chemical, proximate and mineral analysis on raw and roasted seeds of groundnut
title_full Comparative physico-chemical, proximate and mineral analysis on raw and roasted seeds of groundnut
title_fullStr Comparative physico-chemical, proximate and mineral analysis on raw and roasted seeds of groundnut
title_full_unstemmed Comparative physico-chemical, proximate and mineral analysis on raw and roasted seeds of groundnut
title_sort comparative physico-chemical, proximate and mineral analysis on raw and roasted seeds of groundnut
publisher Communications in Plant Sciences
series Communications in Plant Sciences
issn 2237-4027
2237-4027
publishDate 2013-10-01
description Physico-chemical, proximate and nutritionally valuable minerals were determined aiming to compare raw and roasted groundnut seeds. The results indicated that total ash content of raw groundnut (4.6%) was higher than the roasted groundnut (4.1%) seeds. Crude protein content of roasted groundnut was higher (26.1%) when compared to that of raw groundnut (24.9%). Crude carbohydrates levels of raw groundnut (25.3%) are lower when compared with that of roasted groundnut (26.5%). Crude fat ranged from 39.1% in raw groundnut to 39.6% in roasted groundnut. Crude fiber percentage both in raw (2.9%) and roasted (3.1%) conditions were good. The moisture content of the raw groundnut (4.1%) was more than the roasted groundnut (3.6%) because of not exposure to heat. Seeds showed higher energy values both in raw and roasted conditions. Significant amount of minerals like potassium, calcium, magnesium, phosphorus, and zinc were present both in raw and roasted conditions. Based on statistical analysis the results showed highly significant differences (P < 0.05) between the raw and roasted seeds.
topic Arachis hypogaea
proximate
mineral analysis
seed quality
url http://complantsci.files.wordpress.com/2013/10/complantsci_3_1_7.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT bhanusaravankumar comparativephysicochemicalproximateandmineralanalysisonrawandroastedseedsofgroundnut
AT sadagopanravishankar comparativephysicochemicalproximateandmineralanalysisonrawandroastedseedsofgroundnut
AT ragurupanduvasanthi comparativephysicochemicalproximateandmineralanalysisonrawandroastedseedsofgroundnut
AT kalapativishnuvardhan comparativephysicochemicalproximateandmineralanalysisonrawandroastedseedsofgroundnut
AT mabbupurushotham comparativephysicochemicalproximateandmineralanalysisonrawandroastedseedsofgroundnut
_version_ 1725793676927434752