Coerced addiction treatment: Client perspectives and the implications of their neglect

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Recent work has criticized the evidence base for the effectiveness of addiction treatment under social controls and coercion, suggesting that the development of sound policies and treatment practices has been hampered by numerous limitations of the research condu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Urbanoski Karen A
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2010-06-01
Series:Harm Reduction Journal
Online Access:http://www.harmreductionjournal.com/content/7/1/13
id doaj-9dbbc548847b4ba6b12c85ef118c3ee2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9dbbc548847b4ba6b12c85ef118c3ee22020-11-25T01:26:56ZengBMCHarm Reduction Journal1477-75172010-06-01711310.1186/1477-7517-7-13Coerced addiction treatment: Client perspectives and the implications of their neglectUrbanoski Karen A<p>Abstract</p> <p>Recent work has criticized the evidence base for the effectiveness of addiction treatment under social controls and coercion, suggesting that the development of sound policies and treatment practices has been hampered by numerous limitations of the research conducted to date. Implicit assumptions of the effectiveness of coerced treatment are evident in the organization and evolution of treatment, legal, and social service systems, as well as in related legislative practices. This review builds upon previous work by focusing in greater detail on the potential value of incorporating client perspectives on coercion and the implications for interpreting and applying existing research findings. Reviewing the existing empirical and theoretical literature, a case is made for greater accuracy in representing coercive experiences and events in research, so as to better align the measured concepts with actual processes of treatment entry and admission. Attention is given to studies of the effectiveness of treatment under social controls or pressures, the connections to coercion and decision-making, and theoretical perspectives on motivation and behaviour change, including Self-Determination Theory in particular. This synthesis of the available research on coerced addiction treatment suggests that it remains largely unclear to what extent many of the commonly employed methods for getting people into treatment may be detrimental to the treatment process and longer-term outcomes. The impact of coercion upon individual clients, treatment systems, and population health has not been adequately dealt with by addiction researchers to date.</p> http://www.harmreductionjournal.com/content/7/1/13
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Urbanoski Karen A
spellingShingle Urbanoski Karen A
Coerced addiction treatment: Client perspectives and the implications of their neglect
Harm Reduction Journal
author_facet Urbanoski Karen A
author_sort Urbanoski Karen A
title Coerced addiction treatment: Client perspectives and the implications of their neglect
title_short Coerced addiction treatment: Client perspectives and the implications of their neglect
title_full Coerced addiction treatment: Client perspectives and the implications of their neglect
title_fullStr Coerced addiction treatment: Client perspectives and the implications of their neglect
title_full_unstemmed Coerced addiction treatment: Client perspectives and the implications of their neglect
title_sort coerced addiction treatment: client perspectives and the implications of their neglect
publisher BMC
series Harm Reduction Journal
issn 1477-7517
publishDate 2010-06-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Recent work has criticized the evidence base for the effectiveness of addiction treatment under social controls and coercion, suggesting that the development of sound policies and treatment practices has been hampered by numerous limitations of the research conducted to date. Implicit assumptions of the effectiveness of coerced treatment are evident in the organization and evolution of treatment, legal, and social service systems, as well as in related legislative practices. This review builds upon previous work by focusing in greater detail on the potential value of incorporating client perspectives on coercion and the implications for interpreting and applying existing research findings. Reviewing the existing empirical and theoretical literature, a case is made for greater accuracy in representing coercive experiences and events in research, so as to better align the measured concepts with actual processes of treatment entry and admission. Attention is given to studies of the effectiveness of treatment under social controls or pressures, the connections to coercion and decision-making, and theoretical perspectives on motivation and behaviour change, including Self-Determination Theory in particular. This synthesis of the available research on coerced addiction treatment suggests that it remains largely unclear to what extent many of the commonly employed methods for getting people into treatment may be detrimental to the treatment process and longer-term outcomes. The impact of coercion upon individual clients, treatment systems, and population health has not been adequately dealt with by addiction researchers to date.</p>
url http://www.harmreductionjournal.com/content/7/1/13
work_keys_str_mv AT urbanoskikarena coercedaddictiontreatmentclientperspectivesandtheimplicationsoftheirneglect
_version_ 1725107991227662336