General External Uncertainty Models of Three-Plane Intersection Point for 3D Absolute Accuracy Assessment of Lidar Point Cloud

The traditional practice to assess accuracy in lidar data involves calculating RMSEz (root mean square error of the vertical component). Accuracy assessment of lidar point clouds in full 3D (three dimension) is not routinely performed. The main challenge in assessing accuracy in full 3D is how to id...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Minsu Kim, Seonkyung Park, Jeffrey Danielson, Jeffrey Irwin, Gregory Stensaas, Jason Stoker, Joshua Nimetz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-11-01
Series:Remote Sensing
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/11/23/2737
id doaj-9da9bdc14e8d4ee1b27b9433129d240e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9da9bdc14e8d4ee1b27b9433129d240e2020-11-25T01:08:43ZengMDPI AGRemote Sensing2072-42922019-11-011123273710.3390/rs11232737rs11232737General External Uncertainty Models of Three-Plane Intersection Point for 3D Absolute Accuracy Assessment of Lidar Point CloudMinsu Kim0Seonkyung Park1Jeffrey Danielson2Jeffrey Irwin3Gregory Stensaas4Jason Stoker5Joshua Nimetz6KBR, Contractor to U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS), Sioux Falls, SD 57198, USAUnited Support Services (USS), Contractor to USGS EROS, Sioux Falls, SD 57198, USAUSGS EROS, Sioux Falls, SD 57198, USAUSGS EROS, Sioux Falls, SD 57198, USAUSGS EROS, Sioux Falls, SD 57198, USAUSGS, National Geospatial Program, Reston, VA 20192, USAUSGS, National Geospatial Technical Operations Center, Denver, CO 80225, USAThe traditional practice to assess accuracy in lidar data involves calculating RMSEz (root mean square error of the vertical component). Accuracy assessment of lidar point clouds in full 3D (three dimension) is not routinely performed. The main challenge in assessing accuracy in full 3D is how to identify a conjugate point of a ground-surveyed checkpoint in the lidar point cloud with the smallest possible uncertainty value. Relatively coarse point-spacing in airborne lidar data makes it challenging to determine a conjugate point accurately. As a result, a substantial unwanted error is added to the inherent positional uncertainty of the lidar data. Unless we keep this additional error small enough, the 3D accuracy assessment result will not properly represent the inherent uncertainty. We call this added error “external uncertainty,” which is associated with conjugate point identification. This research developed a general external uncertainty model using three-plane intersections and accounts for several factors (sensor precision, feature dimension, and point density). This method can be used for lidar point cloud data from a wide range of sensor qualities, point densities, and sizes of the features of interest. The external uncertainty model was derived as a semi-analytical function that takes the number of points on a plane as an input. It is a normalized general function that can be scaled by smooth surface precision (SSP) of a lidar system. This general uncertainty model provides a quantitative guideline on the required conditions for the conjugate point based on the geometric features. Applications of the external uncertainty model were demonstrated using various lidar point cloud data from the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) 3D Elevation Program (3DEP) library to determine the valid conditions for a conjugate point from three-plane modeling.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/11/23/2737lidar3d accuracy assessmentexternal uncertainty model
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Minsu Kim
Seonkyung Park
Jeffrey Danielson
Jeffrey Irwin
Gregory Stensaas
Jason Stoker
Joshua Nimetz
spellingShingle Minsu Kim
Seonkyung Park
Jeffrey Danielson
Jeffrey Irwin
Gregory Stensaas
Jason Stoker
Joshua Nimetz
General External Uncertainty Models of Three-Plane Intersection Point for 3D Absolute Accuracy Assessment of Lidar Point Cloud
Remote Sensing
lidar
3d accuracy assessment
external uncertainty model
author_facet Minsu Kim
Seonkyung Park
Jeffrey Danielson
Jeffrey Irwin
Gregory Stensaas
Jason Stoker
Joshua Nimetz
author_sort Minsu Kim
title General External Uncertainty Models of Three-Plane Intersection Point for 3D Absolute Accuracy Assessment of Lidar Point Cloud
title_short General External Uncertainty Models of Three-Plane Intersection Point for 3D Absolute Accuracy Assessment of Lidar Point Cloud
title_full General External Uncertainty Models of Three-Plane Intersection Point for 3D Absolute Accuracy Assessment of Lidar Point Cloud
title_fullStr General External Uncertainty Models of Three-Plane Intersection Point for 3D Absolute Accuracy Assessment of Lidar Point Cloud
title_full_unstemmed General External Uncertainty Models of Three-Plane Intersection Point for 3D Absolute Accuracy Assessment of Lidar Point Cloud
title_sort general external uncertainty models of three-plane intersection point for 3d absolute accuracy assessment of lidar point cloud
publisher MDPI AG
series Remote Sensing
issn 2072-4292
publishDate 2019-11-01
description The traditional practice to assess accuracy in lidar data involves calculating RMSEz (root mean square error of the vertical component). Accuracy assessment of lidar point clouds in full 3D (three dimension) is not routinely performed. The main challenge in assessing accuracy in full 3D is how to identify a conjugate point of a ground-surveyed checkpoint in the lidar point cloud with the smallest possible uncertainty value. Relatively coarse point-spacing in airborne lidar data makes it challenging to determine a conjugate point accurately. As a result, a substantial unwanted error is added to the inherent positional uncertainty of the lidar data. Unless we keep this additional error small enough, the 3D accuracy assessment result will not properly represent the inherent uncertainty. We call this added error “external uncertainty,” which is associated with conjugate point identification. This research developed a general external uncertainty model using three-plane intersections and accounts for several factors (sensor precision, feature dimension, and point density). This method can be used for lidar point cloud data from a wide range of sensor qualities, point densities, and sizes of the features of interest. The external uncertainty model was derived as a semi-analytical function that takes the number of points on a plane as an input. It is a normalized general function that can be scaled by smooth surface precision (SSP) of a lidar system. This general uncertainty model provides a quantitative guideline on the required conditions for the conjugate point based on the geometric features. Applications of the external uncertainty model were demonstrated using various lidar point cloud data from the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) 3D Elevation Program (3DEP) library to determine the valid conditions for a conjugate point from three-plane modeling.
topic lidar
3d accuracy assessment
external uncertainty model
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/11/23/2737
work_keys_str_mv AT minsukim generalexternaluncertaintymodelsofthreeplaneintersectionpointfor3dabsoluteaccuracyassessmentoflidarpointcloud
AT seonkyungpark generalexternaluncertaintymodelsofthreeplaneintersectionpointfor3dabsoluteaccuracyassessmentoflidarpointcloud
AT jeffreydanielson generalexternaluncertaintymodelsofthreeplaneintersectionpointfor3dabsoluteaccuracyassessmentoflidarpointcloud
AT jeffreyirwin generalexternaluncertaintymodelsofthreeplaneintersectionpointfor3dabsoluteaccuracyassessmentoflidarpointcloud
AT gregorystensaas generalexternaluncertaintymodelsofthreeplaneintersectionpointfor3dabsoluteaccuracyassessmentoflidarpointcloud
AT jasonstoker generalexternaluncertaintymodelsofthreeplaneintersectionpointfor3dabsoluteaccuracyassessmentoflidarpointcloud
AT joshuanimetz generalexternaluncertaintymodelsofthreeplaneintersectionpointfor3dabsoluteaccuracyassessmentoflidarpointcloud
_version_ 1725181797989351424