General External Uncertainty Models of Three-Plane Intersection Point for 3D Absolute Accuracy Assessment of Lidar Point Cloud
The traditional practice to assess accuracy in lidar data involves calculating RMSEz (root mean square error of the vertical component). Accuracy assessment of lidar point clouds in full 3D (three dimension) is not routinely performed. The main challenge in assessing accuracy in full 3D is how to id...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2019-11-01
|
Series: | Remote Sensing |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/11/23/2737 |
id |
doaj-9da9bdc14e8d4ee1b27b9433129d240e |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-9da9bdc14e8d4ee1b27b9433129d240e2020-11-25T01:08:43ZengMDPI AGRemote Sensing2072-42922019-11-011123273710.3390/rs11232737rs11232737General External Uncertainty Models of Three-Plane Intersection Point for 3D Absolute Accuracy Assessment of Lidar Point CloudMinsu Kim0Seonkyung Park1Jeffrey Danielson2Jeffrey Irwin3Gregory Stensaas4Jason Stoker5Joshua Nimetz6KBR, Contractor to U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS), Sioux Falls, SD 57198, USAUnited Support Services (USS), Contractor to USGS EROS, Sioux Falls, SD 57198, USAUSGS EROS, Sioux Falls, SD 57198, USAUSGS EROS, Sioux Falls, SD 57198, USAUSGS EROS, Sioux Falls, SD 57198, USAUSGS, National Geospatial Program, Reston, VA 20192, USAUSGS, National Geospatial Technical Operations Center, Denver, CO 80225, USAThe traditional practice to assess accuracy in lidar data involves calculating RMSEz (root mean square error of the vertical component). Accuracy assessment of lidar point clouds in full 3D (three dimension) is not routinely performed. The main challenge in assessing accuracy in full 3D is how to identify a conjugate point of a ground-surveyed checkpoint in the lidar point cloud with the smallest possible uncertainty value. Relatively coarse point-spacing in airborne lidar data makes it challenging to determine a conjugate point accurately. As a result, a substantial unwanted error is added to the inherent positional uncertainty of the lidar data. Unless we keep this additional error small enough, the 3D accuracy assessment result will not properly represent the inherent uncertainty. We call this added error “external uncertainty,” which is associated with conjugate point identification. This research developed a general external uncertainty model using three-plane intersections and accounts for several factors (sensor precision, feature dimension, and point density). This method can be used for lidar point cloud data from a wide range of sensor qualities, point densities, and sizes of the features of interest. The external uncertainty model was derived as a semi-analytical function that takes the number of points on a plane as an input. It is a normalized general function that can be scaled by smooth surface precision (SSP) of a lidar system. This general uncertainty model provides a quantitative guideline on the required conditions for the conjugate point based on the geometric features. Applications of the external uncertainty model were demonstrated using various lidar point cloud data from the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) 3D Elevation Program (3DEP) library to determine the valid conditions for a conjugate point from three-plane modeling.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/11/23/2737lidar3d accuracy assessmentexternal uncertainty model |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Minsu Kim Seonkyung Park Jeffrey Danielson Jeffrey Irwin Gregory Stensaas Jason Stoker Joshua Nimetz |
spellingShingle |
Minsu Kim Seonkyung Park Jeffrey Danielson Jeffrey Irwin Gregory Stensaas Jason Stoker Joshua Nimetz General External Uncertainty Models of Three-Plane Intersection Point for 3D Absolute Accuracy Assessment of Lidar Point Cloud Remote Sensing lidar 3d accuracy assessment external uncertainty model |
author_facet |
Minsu Kim Seonkyung Park Jeffrey Danielson Jeffrey Irwin Gregory Stensaas Jason Stoker Joshua Nimetz |
author_sort |
Minsu Kim |
title |
General External Uncertainty Models of Three-Plane Intersection Point for 3D Absolute Accuracy Assessment of Lidar Point Cloud |
title_short |
General External Uncertainty Models of Three-Plane Intersection Point for 3D Absolute Accuracy Assessment of Lidar Point Cloud |
title_full |
General External Uncertainty Models of Three-Plane Intersection Point for 3D Absolute Accuracy Assessment of Lidar Point Cloud |
title_fullStr |
General External Uncertainty Models of Three-Plane Intersection Point for 3D Absolute Accuracy Assessment of Lidar Point Cloud |
title_full_unstemmed |
General External Uncertainty Models of Three-Plane Intersection Point for 3D Absolute Accuracy Assessment of Lidar Point Cloud |
title_sort |
general external uncertainty models of three-plane intersection point for 3d absolute accuracy assessment of lidar point cloud |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Remote Sensing |
issn |
2072-4292 |
publishDate |
2019-11-01 |
description |
The traditional practice to assess accuracy in lidar data involves calculating RMSEz (root mean square error of the vertical component). Accuracy assessment of lidar point clouds in full 3D (three dimension) is not routinely performed. The main challenge in assessing accuracy in full 3D is how to identify a conjugate point of a ground-surveyed checkpoint in the lidar point cloud with the smallest possible uncertainty value. Relatively coarse point-spacing in airborne lidar data makes it challenging to determine a conjugate point accurately. As a result, a substantial unwanted error is added to the inherent positional uncertainty of the lidar data. Unless we keep this additional error small enough, the 3D accuracy assessment result will not properly represent the inherent uncertainty. We call this added error “external uncertainty,” which is associated with conjugate point identification. This research developed a general external uncertainty model using three-plane intersections and accounts for several factors (sensor precision, feature dimension, and point density). This method can be used for lidar point cloud data from a wide range of sensor qualities, point densities, and sizes of the features of interest. The external uncertainty model was derived as a semi-analytical function that takes the number of points on a plane as an input. It is a normalized general function that can be scaled by smooth surface precision (SSP) of a lidar system. This general uncertainty model provides a quantitative guideline on the required conditions for the conjugate point based on the geometric features. Applications of the external uncertainty model were demonstrated using various lidar point cloud data from the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) 3D Elevation Program (3DEP) library to determine the valid conditions for a conjugate point from three-plane modeling. |
topic |
lidar 3d accuracy assessment external uncertainty model |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/11/23/2737 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT minsukim generalexternaluncertaintymodelsofthreeplaneintersectionpointfor3dabsoluteaccuracyassessmentoflidarpointcloud AT seonkyungpark generalexternaluncertaintymodelsofthreeplaneintersectionpointfor3dabsoluteaccuracyassessmentoflidarpointcloud AT jeffreydanielson generalexternaluncertaintymodelsofthreeplaneintersectionpointfor3dabsoluteaccuracyassessmentoflidarpointcloud AT jeffreyirwin generalexternaluncertaintymodelsofthreeplaneintersectionpointfor3dabsoluteaccuracyassessmentoflidarpointcloud AT gregorystensaas generalexternaluncertaintymodelsofthreeplaneintersectionpointfor3dabsoluteaccuracyassessmentoflidarpointcloud AT jasonstoker generalexternaluncertaintymodelsofthreeplaneintersectionpointfor3dabsoluteaccuracyassessmentoflidarpointcloud AT joshuanimetz generalexternaluncertaintymodelsofthreeplaneintersectionpointfor3dabsoluteaccuracyassessmentoflidarpointcloud |
_version_ |
1725181797989351424 |