An Alternative to the Continued Accumulation of Separated Plutonium in Japan: Dry Cask Storage of Spent Fuel

As of the end of 2017, Japan had a stockpile of 48 tons of separated plutonium. It will take more than a decade for Japan to convert most of that plutonium into “mixed-oxide” (MOX) fuel and load it into power reactors licensed to use such fuel. This is a very costly program. Including the cost of re...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Masafumi Takubo, Frank N. Von Hippel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2018-07-01
Series:Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/25751654.2018.1527886
id doaj-9d9977693146497a924b2c412ca8d3f3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9d9977693146497a924b2c412ca8d3f32020-11-24T21:50:11ZengTaylor & Francis GroupJournal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament2575-16542018-07-011228130410.1080/25751654.2018.15278861527886An Alternative to the Continued Accumulation of Separated Plutonium in Japan: Dry Cask Storage of Spent FuelMasafumi Takubo0Frank N. Von Hippel1Independent AnalystPrinceton UniversityAs of the end of 2017, Japan had a stockpile of 48 tons of separated plutonium. It will take more than a decade for Japan to convert most of that plutonium into “mixed-oxide” (MOX) fuel and load it into power reactors licensed to use such fuel. This is a very costly program. Including the cost of reprocessing, MOX fuel costs about ten times more than the low-enriched-uranium fuel that otherwise would be used by these reactors. Yet Japan has a policy to start separating more plutonium from spent reactor fuel as soon as the Rokkasho Reprocessing Plant can be put into operation – currently projected for 2021 after 24 years of delay due to a variety of technical problems and upgrades in safety requirements. Japan’s government remains committed to this costly and troubled program primarily because, pending the availability of additional spent-fuel storage space on or off site, reprocessing is seen as the only way to get spent fuel out of reactor pools that are getting full. Because of concerns about the safety of dense-packed spent-fuel pools, however, the prefectures and towns hosting Japan’s power reactors are beginning to accept on-site storage of spent fuel in dry casks. This is the option the United States and many other countries chose after they cancelled their reprocessing programs and their powerplant pools filled up. Its increasing availability in Japan, if backed by a determined policy to accelerate its introduction, should make it possible to cancel reprocessing in Japan as well.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/25751654.2018.1527886Plutonium stocksplutonium useplutonium disposalspent fuel reprocessingspent fuel storagenuclear power in Japan
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Masafumi Takubo
Frank N. Von Hippel
spellingShingle Masafumi Takubo
Frank N. Von Hippel
An Alternative to the Continued Accumulation of Separated Plutonium in Japan: Dry Cask Storage of Spent Fuel
Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament
Plutonium stocks
plutonium use
plutonium disposal
spent fuel reprocessing
spent fuel storage
nuclear power in Japan
author_facet Masafumi Takubo
Frank N. Von Hippel
author_sort Masafumi Takubo
title An Alternative to the Continued Accumulation of Separated Plutonium in Japan: Dry Cask Storage of Spent Fuel
title_short An Alternative to the Continued Accumulation of Separated Plutonium in Japan: Dry Cask Storage of Spent Fuel
title_full An Alternative to the Continued Accumulation of Separated Plutonium in Japan: Dry Cask Storage of Spent Fuel
title_fullStr An Alternative to the Continued Accumulation of Separated Plutonium in Japan: Dry Cask Storage of Spent Fuel
title_full_unstemmed An Alternative to the Continued Accumulation of Separated Plutonium in Japan: Dry Cask Storage of Spent Fuel
title_sort alternative to the continued accumulation of separated plutonium in japan: dry cask storage of spent fuel
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament
issn 2575-1654
publishDate 2018-07-01
description As of the end of 2017, Japan had a stockpile of 48 tons of separated plutonium. It will take more than a decade for Japan to convert most of that plutonium into “mixed-oxide” (MOX) fuel and load it into power reactors licensed to use such fuel. This is a very costly program. Including the cost of reprocessing, MOX fuel costs about ten times more than the low-enriched-uranium fuel that otherwise would be used by these reactors. Yet Japan has a policy to start separating more plutonium from spent reactor fuel as soon as the Rokkasho Reprocessing Plant can be put into operation – currently projected for 2021 after 24 years of delay due to a variety of technical problems and upgrades in safety requirements. Japan’s government remains committed to this costly and troubled program primarily because, pending the availability of additional spent-fuel storage space on or off site, reprocessing is seen as the only way to get spent fuel out of reactor pools that are getting full. Because of concerns about the safety of dense-packed spent-fuel pools, however, the prefectures and towns hosting Japan’s power reactors are beginning to accept on-site storage of spent fuel in dry casks. This is the option the United States and many other countries chose after they cancelled their reprocessing programs and their powerplant pools filled up. Its increasing availability in Japan, if backed by a determined policy to accelerate its introduction, should make it possible to cancel reprocessing in Japan as well.
topic Plutonium stocks
plutonium use
plutonium disposal
spent fuel reprocessing
spent fuel storage
nuclear power in Japan
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/25751654.2018.1527886
work_keys_str_mv AT masafumitakubo analternativetothecontinuedaccumulationofseparatedplutoniuminjapandrycaskstorageofspentfuel
AT franknvonhippel analternativetothecontinuedaccumulationofseparatedplutoniuminjapandrycaskstorageofspentfuel
AT masafumitakubo alternativetothecontinuedaccumulationofseparatedplutoniuminjapandrycaskstorageofspentfuel
AT franknvonhippel alternativetothecontinuedaccumulationofseparatedplutoniuminjapandrycaskstorageofspentfuel
_version_ 1725884772973019136