Evaluation of innovative ideas for Public Transport proposed by citizens using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA)

Abstract Introduction The use of participatory techniques in the field of transport is coming to the forefront recently. In this frame, eight co-creation workshops and five online crowdsourcing campaigns took place in Thessaloniki, Southern Tuscany, Rotterdam/The Hague, and Frankfurt, from which man...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dimitrios Nalmpantis, Anastasia Roukouni, Evangelos Genitsaris, Afroditi Stamelou, Aristotelis Naniopoulos
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2019-04-01
Series:European Transport Research Review
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12544-019-0356-6
id doaj-9d929c2c85324e7b9318d414a69580d6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9d929c2c85324e7b9318d414a69580d62020-11-25T03:00:27ZengSpringerOpenEuropean Transport Research Review1867-07171866-88872019-04-0111111610.1186/s12544-019-0356-6Evaluation of innovative ideas for Public Transport proposed by citizens using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA)Dimitrios Nalmpantis0Anastasia Roukouni1Evangelos Genitsaris2Afroditi Stamelou3Aristotelis Naniopoulos4School of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Aristotle University of ThessalonikiSchool of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Aristotle University of ThessalonikiSchool of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Aristotle University of ThessalonikiSchool of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Aristotle University of ThessalonikiSchool of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Aristotle University of ThessalonikiAbstract Introduction The use of participatory techniques in the field of transport is coming to the forefront recently. In this frame, eight co-creation workshops and five online crowdsourcing campaigns took place in Thessaloniki, Southern Tuscany, Rotterdam/The Hague, and Frankfurt, from which many innovative ideas to enhance Public Transport were generated by citizens. Purpose A simple list of innovations would not be very useful for Public Transport Operators, as they cannot implement all of them at once. There was an obvious need for their ranking and this is the purpose of this paper. Methods The ranking was realized with the most used Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis method in transportation research, i.e. the Analytic Hierarchy Process, using three criteria: Feasibility, Utility, and Innovativeness. An online questionnaire was distributed to experts, using a modified snowball sampling technique, which yielded 97 completed questionnaires. Results Utility (42.90%) was found to be the most important criterion, followed by Feasibility (40.10%), and Innovativeness (17.00%). Four lists of innovations were derived, ranked with respect to a) all three examined criteria, b) Feasibility, c) Utility, and d) Innovativeness. The highest ranked innovation for a) and c) was found to be Mobility as a Service and platform with real-time travel, comfort, and multi-modal information; for b) City marketing from a Public Transport perspective; and for d) Advanced e-ticketing system. Conclusion The results revealed which of the innovations are the most promising and provide valuable insight into how to integrate innovation with Public Transport to make it more attractive. Public Transport Operators may use the results according to the peculiarities of their city and the importance they give to Feasibility, Utility, and Innovativeness.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12544-019-0356-6Public transportInnovationEvaluationCo-creationCollective intelligenceMulti-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA)
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dimitrios Nalmpantis
Anastasia Roukouni
Evangelos Genitsaris
Afroditi Stamelou
Aristotelis Naniopoulos
spellingShingle Dimitrios Nalmpantis
Anastasia Roukouni
Evangelos Genitsaris
Afroditi Stamelou
Aristotelis Naniopoulos
Evaluation of innovative ideas for Public Transport proposed by citizens using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA)
European Transport Research Review
Public transport
Innovation
Evaluation
Co-creation
Collective intelligence
Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA)
author_facet Dimitrios Nalmpantis
Anastasia Roukouni
Evangelos Genitsaris
Afroditi Stamelou
Aristotelis Naniopoulos
author_sort Dimitrios Nalmpantis
title Evaluation of innovative ideas for Public Transport proposed by citizens using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA)
title_short Evaluation of innovative ideas for Public Transport proposed by citizens using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA)
title_full Evaluation of innovative ideas for Public Transport proposed by citizens using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA)
title_fullStr Evaluation of innovative ideas for Public Transport proposed by citizens using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA)
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of innovative ideas for Public Transport proposed by citizens using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA)
title_sort evaluation of innovative ideas for public transport proposed by citizens using multi-criteria decision analysis (mcda)
publisher SpringerOpen
series European Transport Research Review
issn 1867-0717
1866-8887
publishDate 2019-04-01
description Abstract Introduction The use of participatory techniques in the field of transport is coming to the forefront recently. In this frame, eight co-creation workshops and five online crowdsourcing campaigns took place in Thessaloniki, Southern Tuscany, Rotterdam/The Hague, and Frankfurt, from which many innovative ideas to enhance Public Transport were generated by citizens. Purpose A simple list of innovations would not be very useful for Public Transport Operators, as they cannot implement all of them at once. There was an obvious need for their ranking and this is the purpose of this paper. Methods The ranking was realized with the most used Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis method in transportation research, i.e. the Analytic Hierarchy Process, using three criteria: Feasibility, Utility, and Innovativeness. An online questionnaire was distributed to experts, using a modified snowball sampling technique, which yielded 97 completed questionnaires. Results Utility (42.90%) was found to be the most important criterion, followed by Feasibility (40.10%), and Innovativeness (17.00%). Four lists of innovations were derived, ranked with respect to a) all three examined criteria, b) Feasibility, c) Utility, and d) Innovativeness. The highest ranked innovation for a) and c) was found to be Mobility as a Service and platform with real-time travel, comfort, and multi-modal information; for b) City marketing from a Public Transport perspective; and for d) Advanced e-ticketing system. Conclusion The results revealed which of the innovations are the most promising and provide valuable insight into how to integrate innovation with Public Transport to make it more attractive. Public Transport Operators may use the results according to the peculiarities of their city and the importance they give to Feasibility, Utility, and Innovativeness.
topic Public transport
Innovation
Evaluation
Co-creation
Collective intelligence
Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA)
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12544-019-0356-6
work_keys_str_mv AT dimitriosnalmpantis evaluationofinnovativeideasforpublictransportproposedbycitizensusingmulticriteriadecisionanalysismcda
AT anastasiaroukouni evaluationofinnovativeideasforpublictransportproposedbycitizensusingmulticriteriadecisionanalysismcda
AT evangelosgenitsaris evaluationofinnovativeideasforpublictransportproposedbycitizensusingmulticriteriadecisionanalysismcda
AT afroditistamelou evaluationofinnovativeideasforpublictransportproposedbycitizensusingmulticriteriadecisionanalysismcda
AT aristotelisnaniopoulos evaluationofinnovativeideasforpublictransportproposedbycitizensusingmulticriteriadecisionanalysismcda
_version_ 1724698030715699200