Evaluation of innovative ideas for Public Transport proposed by citizens using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA)
Abstract Introduction The use of participatory techniques in the field of transport is coming to the forefront recently. In this frame, eight co-creation workshops and five online crowdsourcing campaigns took place in Thessaloniki, Southern Tuscany, Rotterdam/The Hague, and Frankfurt, from which man...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SpringerOpen
2019-04-01
|
Series: | European Transport Research Review |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12544-019-0356-6 |
id |
doaj-9d929c2c85324e7b9318d414a69580d6 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-9d929c2c85324e7b9318d414a69580d62020-11-25T03:00:27ZengSpringerOpenEuropean Transport Research Review1867-07171866-88872019-04-0111111610.1186/s12544-019-0356-6Evaluation of innovative ideas for Public Transport proposed by citizens using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA)Dimitrios Nalmpantis0Anastasia Roukouni1Evangelos Genitsaris2Afroditi Stamelou3Aristotelis Naniopoulos4School of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Aristotle University of ThessalonikiSchool of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Aristotle University of ThessalonikiSchool of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Aristotle University of ThessalonikiSchool of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Aristotle University of ThessalonikiSchool of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Aristotle University of ThessalonikiAbstract Introduction The use of participatory techniques in the field of transport is coming to the forefront recently. In this frame, eight co-creation workshops and five online crowdsourcing campaigns took place in Thessaloniki, Southern Tuscany, Rotterdam/The Hague, and Frankfurt, from which many innovative ideas to enhance Public Transport were generated by citizens. Purpose A simple list of innovations would not be very useful for Public Transport Operators, as they cannot implement all of them at once. There was an obvious need for their ranking and this is the purpose of this paper. Methods The ranking was realized with the most used Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis method in transportation research, i.e. the Analytic Hierarchy Process, using three criteria: Feasibility, Utility, and Innovativeness. An online questionnaire was distributed to experts, using a modified snowball sampling technique, which yielded 97 completed questionnaires. Results Utility (42.90%) was found to be the most important criterion, followed by Feasibility (40.10%), and Innovativeness (17.00%). Four lists of innovations were derived, ranked with respect to a) all three examined criteria, b) Feasibility, c) Utility, and d) Innovativeness. The highest ranked innovation for a) and c) was found to be Mobility as a Service and platform with real-time travel, comfort, and multi-modal information; for b) City marketing from a Public Transport perspective; and for d) Advanced e-ticketing system. Conclusion The results revealed which of the innovations are the most promising and provide valuable insight into how to integrate innovation with Public Transport to make it more attractive. Public Transport Operators may use the results according to the peculiarities of their city and the importance they give to Feasibility, Utility, and Innovativeness.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12544-019-0356-6Public transportInnovationEvaluationCo-creationCollective intelligenceMulti-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Dimitrios Nalmpantis Anastasia Roukouni Evangelos Genitsaris Afroditi Stamelou Aristotelis Naniopoulos |
spellingShingle |
Dimitrios Nalmpantis Anastasia Roukouni Evangelos Genitsaris Afroditi Stamelou Aristotelis Naniopoulos Evaluation of innovative ideas for Public Transport proposed by citizens using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) European Transport Research Review Public transport Innovation Evaluation Co-creation Collective intelligence Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) |
author_facet |
Dimitrios Nalmpantis Anastasia Roukouni Evangelos Genitsaris Afroditi Stamelou Aristotelis Naniopoulos |
author_sort |
Dimitrios Nalmpantis |
title |
Evaluation of innovative ideas for Public Transport proposed by citizens using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) |
title_short |
Evaluation of innovative ideas for Public Transport proposed by citizens using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) |
title_full |
Evaluation of innovative ideas for Public Transport proposed by citizens using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of innovative ideas for Public Transport proposed by citizens using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of innovative ideas for Public Transport proposed by citizens using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) |
title_sort |
evaluation of innovative ideas for public transport proposed by citizens using multi-criteria decision analysis (mcda) |
publisher |
SpringerOpen |
series |
European Transport Research Review |
issn |
1867-0717 1866-8887 |
publishDate |
2019-04-01 |
description |
Abstract Introduction The use of participatory techniques in the field of transport is coming to the forefront recently. In this frame, eight co-creation workshops and five online crowdsourcing campaigns took place in Thessaloniki, Southern Tuscany, Rotterdam/The Hague, and Frankfurt, from which many innovative ideas to enhance Public Transport were generated by citizens. Purpose A simple list of innovations would not be very useful for Public Transport Operators, as they cannot implement all of them at once. There was an obvious need for their ranking and this is the purpose of this paper. Methods The ranking was realized with the most used Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis method in transportation research, i.e. the Analytic Hierarchy Process, using three criteria: Feasibility, Utility, and Innovativeness. An online questionnaire was distributed to experts, using a modified snowball sampling technique, which yielded 97 completed questionnaires. Results Utility (42.90%) was found to be the most important criterion, followed by Feasibility (40.10%), and Innovativeness (17.00%). Four lists of innovations were derived, ranked with respect to a) all three examined criteria, b) Feasibility, c) Utility, and d) Innovativeness. The highest ranked innovation for a) and c) was found to be Mobility as a Service and platform with real-time travel, comfort, and multi-modal information; for b) City marketing from a Public Transport perspective; and for d) Advanced e-ticketing system. Conclusion The results revealed which of the innovations are the most promising and provide valuable insight into how to integrate innovation with Public Transport to make it more attractive. Public Transport Operators may use the results according to the peculiarities of their city and the importance they give to Feasibility, Utility, and Innovativeness. |
topic |
Public transport Innovation Evaluation Co-creation Collective intelligence Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12544-019-0356-6 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT dimitriosnalmpantis evaluationofinnovativeideasforpublictransportproposedbycitizensusingmulticriteriadecisionanalysismcda AT anastasiaroukouni evaluationofinnovativeideasforpublictransportproposedbycitizensusingmulticriteriadecisionanalysismcda AT evangelosgenitsaris evaluationofinnovativeideasforpublictransportproposedbycitizensusingmulticriteriadecisionanalysismcda AT afroditistamelou evaluationofinnovativeideasforpublictransportproposedbycitizensusingmulticriteriadecisionanalysismcda AT aristotelisnaniopoulos evaluationofinnovativeideasforpublictransportproposedbycitizensusingmulticriteriadecisionanalysismcda |
_version_ |
1724698030715699200 |