Linguistic Complexity across Two Early Modern English Scientific Text Types

In linguistics the concept of complexity has been analysed from various perspectives, among them language typology and the speech/writing distinction. Within intralinguistic studies, certain key linguistic features associated with reduced or increased complexity have been identified. These features...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jesús Romero-Barranco
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Asociación Española de Estudios Anglo-Norteamericanos (AEDEAN) 2020-12-01
Series:Atlantis
Online Access:https://www.atlantisjournal.org/index.php/atlantis/article/view/662
id doaj-9d8b82952f0e42b3a3f1c87700590dc8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9d8b82952f0e42b3a3f1c87700590dc82020-12-23T16:49:56ZengAsociación Española de Estudios Anglo-Norteamericanos (AEDEAN)Atlantis0210-61241989-68402020-12-01422507110.28914/Atlantis-2020-42.2.03Linguistic Complexity across Two Early Modern English Scientific Text TypesJesús Romero-Barranco0Universidad de GranadaIn linguistics the concept of complexity has been analysed from various perspectives, among them language typology and the speech/writing distinction. Within intralinguistic studies, certain key linguistic features associated with reduced or increased complexity have been identified. These features occur in different patterns across various registers and their frequency is an indicator of the level of complexity of different kinds of texts. The concept of complexity has not, to date, been evaluated in early English medical writing, especiallyin terms of different text types. Thus, the present article analyses linguistic complexity in two Early Modern English medical texts, a surgical treatise (ff. 34r-73v) and a collection of medical recipes (ff. 74r-121v) housed as MS Hunter 135 in Glasgow University Library. Since they represent two different types of medical text, they can be productively compared in terms of linguistic complexity. The results obtained confirm that the surgical treatise is more complex than the collection of medical recipes owing to the higher presence of linguistic features denoting increased complexity in the former and of those indicating reduced linguistic complexity in the latter.https://www.atlantisjournal.org/index.php/atlantis/article/view/662
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jesús Romero-Barranco
spellingShingle Jesús Romero-Barranco
Linguistic Complexity across Two Early Modern English Scientific Text Types
Atlantis
author_facet Jesús Romero-Barranco
author_sort Jesús Romero-Barranco
title Linguistic Complexity across Two Early Modern English Scientific Text Types
title_short Linguistic Complexity across Two Early Modern English Scientific Text Types
title_full Linguistic Complexity across Two Early Modern English Scientific Text Types
title_fullStr Linguistic Complexity across Two Early Modern English Scientific Text Types
title_full_unstemmed Linguistic Complexity across Two Early Modern English Scientific Text Types
title_sort linguistic complexity across two early modern english scientific text types
publisher Asociación Española de Estudios Anglo-Norteamericanos (AEDEAN)
series Atlantis
issn 0210-6124
1989-6840
publishDate 2020-12-01
description In linguistics the concept of complexity has been analysed from various perspectives, among them language typology and the speech/writing distinction. Within intralinguistic studies, certain key linguistic features associated with reduced or increased complexity have been identified. These features occur in different patterns across various registers and their frequency is an indicator of the level of complexity of different kinds of texts. The concept of complexity has not, to date, been evaluated in early English medical writing, especiallyin terms of different text types. Thus, the present article analyses linguistic complexity in two Early Modern English medical texts, a surgical treatise (ff. 34r-73v) and a collection of medical recipes (ff. 74r-121v) housed as MS Hunter 135 in Glasgow University Library. Since they represent two different types of medical text, they can be productively compared in terms of linguistic complexity. The results obtained confirm that the surgical treatise is more complex than the collection of medical recipes owing to the higher presence of linguistic features denoting increased complexity in the former and of those indicating reduced linguistic complexity in the latter.
url https://www.atlantisjournal.org/index.php/atlantis/article/view/662
work_keys_str_mv AT jesusromerobarranco linguisticcomplexityacrosstwoearlymodernenglishscientifictexttypes
_version_ 1724372580323819520