What is a research derived actionable tool, and what factors should be considered in their development? A Delphi study

• Main Authors: Susan Hampshaw, Jo Cooke, Laurie Mott
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: BMC 2018-09-01
• Series: BMC Health Services Research
• Subjects: Delphi study; Knowledge transfer; Dissemination; Knowledge translation; Research derived actionable tool (RDAT)
• Online Access: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12913-018-3551-6

Abstract Background Research findings should be disseminated appropriately to generate maximum impact. The development of research derived ‘actionable’ tools (RDAT) as research outputs may contribute to impact in health services and health systems research. However there is little agreement on what is meant by actionable tool or what can make them useful. We set out to develop a consensus definition of what is meant by a RDAT and to identify characteristics of a RDAT that would support its use across the research-practice boundary. Methods A modified Delphi method was used with a panel of 33 experts comprising of researchers, research funders, policy makers and practitioners. Three rounds were administered including an initial workshop, followed by two online surveys comprising of Likert scales supplemented with open-ended questions. Consensus was defined at 75% agreement. Results Consensus was reached for the definition and characteristics of RDATs, and on considerations that might maximize their use. The panel also agreed how RDATs could become integral to primary research methods, conduct and reporting. A typology of RDATs did not reach consensus. Conclusions A group of experts agreed a definition and characteristics of RDATs that are complementary to peer reviewed publications. The importance of end users shaping such tools was seen as of paramount importance. The findings have implications for research funders to resource such outputs in funding calls. The research community might consider developing and applying skills to coproduce RDATs with end users as part of the research process. Further research is needed on tracking the impact of RDATs, and defining a typology with a range of end-users.