The effectiveness of automatic laparoscopic diagnostics of liver pathology using different methods of digital images classification

Сomputer automatic diagnostic (CAD)/classification of video – images is actual for laparoscopic surgery. Such CAD is supposed to explore intraoperatively for support surgeon decisions. Aim: to evaluate the effectiveness of the CAD systems developed on the basis of two classifiers – HAAR features...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: D. N. Bayazitov, N. V. Kresyun, А. B. Buzinovsky
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Zaporozhye State Medical University 2017-08-01
Series:Patologìâ
Subjects:
Online Access:http://pat.zsmu.edu.ua/article/view/109219/105915
id doaj-9d87e3711e484bd9b71612569ac73f44
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9d87e3711e484bd9b71612569ac73f442020-11-24T22:38:53ZengZaporozhye State Medical UniversityPatologìâ2306-80272310-12372017-08-01218218710.14739/2310-1237.2017.2.109219The effectiveness of automatic laparoscopic diagnostics of liver pathology using different methods of digital images classificationD. N. BayazitovN. V. KresyunА. B. BuzinovskyСomputer automatic diagnostic (CAD)/classification of video – images is actual for laparoscopic surgery. Such CAD is supposed to explore intraoperatively for support surgeon decisions. Aim: to evaluate the effectiveness of the CAD systems developed on the basis of two classifiers – HAAR features cascade and AdaBoost for the detection of cirrhotic and metastatic damages of the liver. Materials and methods. The development of CAD was based on training of HAAR features cascade and AdaBoost classifiers with images/frames, which have been cropped out from video gained in the course of laparoscopic diagnostics. RGB frames which were gamma-corrected and converted into HSV have been used for training. Also descriptors were extracted from images with the modified method of Local Binary Pattern (LBT), which includes data on color characteristics («modified color LBT» – MCLBT) and textural ones for AdaBoost classifier training. 1000 positive images along with 500 negative ones of both types of pathology were used for training. After cessation of training the tests were performed with the aim of the estimation of effectiveness of recognition. Test session images were different from those ones which have been used for training of the classifier. Test control sessions were performed with trained classifiers with 319 frames containing cirrhotic and 253 frames with metastatic deteriorations in liver tissue. 365 frames with the absence of mentioned pathology were used as a control group – practically healthy liver state. Results. Classification of test video-images revealed that the highest recall for cirrhosis diagnostics was achieved after training of AdaBoost with MCLBT descriptors extracted from HSV images – 0.655, and in case for metastatic damages diagnostics – for MCLBT gained from RGB images – 0.925. Hence developed AdaBoost based CAD system achieved 69.0 % correct classification rate (accuracy) for cirrhotic and 92.7 % for metastatic images. The accuracy of Haar features classifier was highest in case of metastatic foci identification and achieved 0.701 (RGB) – 0.717 (HSV) values. Conclusions. Haar features based cascade classifier turned to be less effective when compared with AdaBoost classifier trained with MCLBT descriptors. Metastatic foci are better diagnosed when compared with cirrhotic liver deterioration with the explored approaches to digital images classification. http://pat.zsmu.edu.ua/article/view/109219/105915liver diseaseslaparoscopydiagnostic imagingimage processingcomputer-assisted
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author D. N. Bayazitov
N. V. Kresyun
А. B. Buzinovsky
spellingShingle D. N. Bayazitov
N. V. Kresyun
А. B. Buzinovsky
The effectiveness of automatic laparoscopic diagnostics of liver pathology using different methods of digital images classification
Patologìâ
liver diseases
laparoscopy
diagnostic imaging
image processing
computer-assisted
author_facet D. N. Bayazitov
N. V. Kresyun
А. B. Buzinovsky
author_sort D. N. Bayazitov
title The effectiveness of automatic laparoscopic diagnostics of liver pathology using different methods of digital images classification
title_short The effectiveness of automatic laparoscopic diagnostics of liver pathology using different methods of digital images classification
title_full The effectiveness of automatic laparoscopic diagnostics of liver pathology using different methods of digital images classification
title_fullStr The effectiveness of automatic laparoscopic diagnostics of liver pathology using different methods of digital images classification
title_full_unstemmed The effectiveness of automatic laparoscopic diagnostics of liver pathology using different methods of digital images classification
title_sort effectiveness of automatic laparoscopic diagnostics of liver pathology using different methods of digital images classification
publisher Zaporozhye State Medical University
series Patologìâ
issn 2306-8027
2310-1237
publishDate 2017-08-01
description Сomputer automatic diagnostic (CAD)/classification of video – images is actual for laparoscopic surgery. Such CAD is supposed to explore intraoperatively for support surgeon decisions. Aim: to evaluate the effectiveness of the CAD systems developed on the basis of two classifiers – HAAR features cascade and AdaBoost for the detection of cirrhotic and metastatic damages of the liver. Materials and methods. The development of CAD was based on training of HAAR features cascade and AdaBoost classifiers with images/frames, which have been cropped out from video gained in the course of laparoscopic diagnostics. RGB frames which were gamma-corrected and converted into HSV have been used for training. Also descriptors were extracted from images with the modified method of Local Binary Pattern (LBT), which includes data on color characteristics («modified color LBT» – MCLBT) and textural ones for AdaBoost classifier training. 1000 positive images along with 500 negative ones of both types of pathology were used for training. After cessation of training the tests were performed with the aim of the estimation of effectiveness of recognition. Test session images were different from those ones which have been used for training of the classifier. Test control sessions were performed with trained classifiers with 319 frames containing cirrhotic and 253 frames with metastatic deteriorations in liver tissue. 365 frames with the absence of mentioned pathology were used as a control group – practically healthy liver state. Results. Classification of test video-images revealed that the highest recall for cirrhosis diagnostics was achieved after training of AdaBoost with MCLBT descriptors extracted from HSV images – 0.655, and in case for metastatic damages diagnostics – for MCLBT gained from RGB images – 0.925. Hence developed AdaBoost based CAD system achieved 69.0 % correct classification rate (accuracy) for cirrhotic and 92.7 % for metastatic images. The accuracy of Haar features classifier was highest in case of metastatic foci identification and achieved 0.701 (RGB) – 0.717 (HSV) values. Conclusions. Haar features based cascade classifier turned to be less effective when compared with AdaBoost classifier trained with MCLBT descriptors. Metastatic foci are better diagnosed when compared with cirrhotic liver deterioration with the explored approaches to digital images classification.
topic liver diseases
laparoscopy
diagnostic imaging
image processing
computer-assisted
url http://pat.zsmu.edu.ua/article/view/109219/105915
work_keys_str_mv AT dnbayazitov theeffectivenessofautomaticlaparoscopicdiagnosticsofliverpathologyusingdifferentmethodsofdigitalimagesclassification
AT nvkresyun theeffectivenessofautomaticlaparoscopicdiagnosticsofliverpathologyusingdifferentmethodsofdigitalimagesclassification
AT abbuzinovsky theeffectivenessofautomaticlaparoscopicdiagnosticsofliverpathologyusingdifferentmethodsofdigitalimagesclassification
AT dnbayazitov effectivenessofautomaticlaparoscopicdiagnosticsofliverpathologyusingdifferentmethodsofdigitalimagesclassification
AT nvkresyun effectivenessofautomaticlaparoscopicdiagnosticsofliverpathologyusingdifferentmethodsofdigitalimagesclassification
AT abbuzinovsky effectivenessofautomaticlaparoscopicdiagnosticsofliverpathologyusingdifferentmethodsofdigitalimagesclassification
_version_ 1725711263395217408