Gender differences in peer review outcomes and manuscript impact at six journals of ecology and evolution
Abstract The productivity and performance of men is generally rated more highly than that of women in controlled experiments, suggesting conscious or unconscious gender biases in assessment. The degree to which editors and reviewers of scholarly journals exhibit gender biases that influence outcomes...
Main Authors: | Charles W. Fox, C. E. Timothy Paine |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2019-03-01
|
Series: | Ecology and Evolution |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4993 |
Similar Items
-
Gender diversity of editorial boards and gender differences in the peer review process at six journals of ecology and evolution
by: Charles W. Fox, et al.
Published: (2019-12-01) -
Decoupling the scholarly journal
by: Jason ePriem, et al.
Published: (2012-04-01) -
A Brief Introduction on Peer Review: New Possibilities
by: Sean Scanlan
Published: (2013-06-01) -
Guidelines for open peer review implementation
by: Tony Ross-Hellauer, et al.
Published: (2019-02-01) -
Racial, gender, sexual, and disability identities of the Journal of the Medical Library Association’s editorial board, reviewers, and authors
by: Katherine G. Akers, et al.
Published: (2021-07-01)