Modular tapered conical revision stem in hip revision surgery: mid- term results

Abstract Background The aim of this paper is to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of a fluted tapered modular distal-fixation stem at medium to long-term follow-up. The hypothesis of this investigation was to verify if the use of this implant design may have provided potential advantag...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Loris Perticarini, Stefano Marco Paolo Rossi, Alberto Fioruzzi, Eugenio Jannelli, Mario Mosconi, Francesco Benazzo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-01-01
Series:BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03886-y
id doaj-9d47dda5c1e345b68d818d2d541314e1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9d47dda5c1e345b68d818d2d541314e12021-01-10T12:27:09ZengBMCBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders1471-24742021-01-012211810.1186/s12891-020-03886-yModular tapered conical revision stem in hip revision surgery: mid- term resultsLoris Perticarini0Stefano Marco Paolo Rossi1Alberto Fioruzzi2Eugenio Jannelli3Mario Mosconi4Francesco Benazzo5Sezione di Chirurgia Protesica ad Indirizzo Robotico - Unità di Traumatologia dello Sport, U.O. Ortopedia e Traumatologia Fondazione PoliambulanzaSezione di Chirurgia Protesica ad Indirizzo Robotico - Unità di Traumatologia dello Sport, U.O. Ortopedia e Traumatologia Fondazione PoliambulanzaDipartimento dell’Anca e Traumatologico, IRCCS Policlinico San DonatoClinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San MatteoClinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San MatteoSezione di Chirurgia Protesica ad Indirizzo Robotico - Unità di Traumatologia dello Sport, U.O. Ortopedia e Traumatologia Fondazione PoliambulanzaAbstract Background The aim of this paper is to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of a fluted tapered modular distal-fixation stem at medium to long-term follow-up. The hypothesis of this investigation was to verify if the use of this implant design may have provided potential advantages in femoral revisions and post-traumatic instances where the restoration of the anatomy was the prime concern. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 62 cases of femoral revision surgeries, performed in Paprosky type IIIA and IIIB bone defects between January 2001 and December 2011 with a mean follow-up of 8.5 ± 1.5 years (range 5.1–15.9 years) where a modular fluted stem was used. The clinical assessment was performed with the Harris Hip Score (HHS), and the radiographic evaluation was carried in order to assess the stability of the femoral component. Intra-operative and postoperative complications were recorded, and the rates of complications and revisions for any cause were determined. Results Mean HHS improved 35.4 points from the preoperative assessment. Radiographic evaluation showed a stable stem anchorage in 90.3% of the cases at the last follow-up. Five (8%) implants required additional surgery. Neither breakage of the stem nor loosening of the taper junction were recorded. Kaplan-Meier survivorship was 89.4% (CI: 88.8–90%) for any complication and 92.3% (CI: 91.8–92.7%) according to revision for any causes at 81 months follow-up. Conclusions Our findings suggest that this stem design is a reliable option in cases of complex femoral bone defects, as well as in cases with high functional deficiencies, with promising survivorship.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03886-yConical revision stemFemoral bone defectsHip revision surgeryModularityPeriprosthetic femoral fracture
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Loris Perticarini
Stefano Marco Paolo Rossi
Alberto Fioruzzi
Eugenio Jannelli
Mario Mosconi
Francesco Benazzo
spellingShingle Loris Perticarini
Stefano Marco Paolo Rossi
Alberto Fioruzzi
Eugenio Jannelli
Mario Mosconi
Francesco Benazzo
Modular tapered conical revision stem in hip revision surgery: mid- term results
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Conical revision stem
Femoral bone defects
Hip revision surgery
Modularity
Periprosthetic femoral fracture
author_facet Loris Perticarini
Stefano Marco Paolo Rossi
Alberto Fioruzzi
Eugenio Jannelli
Mario Mosconi
Francesco Benazzo
author_sort Loris Perticarini
title Modular tapered conical revision stem in hip revision surgery: mid- term results
title_short Modular tapered conical revision stem in hip revision surgery: mid- term results
title_full Modular tapered conical revision stem in hip revision surgery: mid- term results
title_fullStr Modular tapered conical revision stem in hip revision surgery: mid- term results
title_full_unstemmed Modular tapered conical revision stem in hip revision surgery: mid- term results
title_sort modular tapered conical revision stem in hip revision surgery: mid- term results
publisher BMC
series BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
issn 1471-2474
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Abstract Background The aim of this paper is to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of a fluted tapered modular distal-fixation stem at medium to long-term follow-up. The hypothesis of this investigation was to verify if the use of this implant design may have provided potential advantages in femoral revisions and post-traumatic instances where the restoration of the anatomy was the prime concern. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 62 cases of femoral revision surgeries, performed in Paprosky type IIIA and IIIB bone defects between January 2001 and December 2011 with a mean follow-up of 8.5 ± 1.5 years (range 5.1–15.9 years) where a modular fluted stem was used. The clinical assessment was performed with the Harris Hip Score (HHS), and the radiographic evaluation was carried in order to assess the stability of the femoral component. Intra-operative and postoperative complications were recorded, and the rates of complications and revisions for any cause were determined. Results Mean HHS improved 35.4 points from the preoperative assessment. Radiographic evaluation showed a stable stem anchorage in 90.3% of the cases at the last follow-up. Five (8%) implants required additional surgery. Neither breakage of the stem nor loosening of the taper junction were recorded. Kaplan-Meier survivorship was 89.4% (CI: 88.8–90%) for any complication and 92.3% (CI: 91.8–92.7%) according to revision for any causes at 81 months follow-up. Conclusions Our findings suggest that this stem design is a reliable option in cases of complex femoral bone defects, as well as in cases with high functional deficiencies, with promising survivorship.
topic Conical revision stem
Femoral bone defects
Hip revision surgery
Modularity
Periprosthetic femoral fracture
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03886-y
work_keys_str_mv AT lorisperticarini modulartaperedconicalrevisionsteminhiprevisionsurgerymidtermresults
AT stefanomarcopaolorossi modulartaperedconicalrevisionsteminhiprevisionsurgerymidtermresults
AT albertofioruzzi modulartaperedconicalrevisionsteminhiprevisionsurgerymidtermresults
AT eugeniojannelli modulartaperedconicalrevisionsteminhiprevisionsurgerymidtermresults
AT mariomosconi modulartaperedconicalrevisionsteminhiprevisionsurgerymidtermresults
AT francescobenazzo modulartaperedconicalrevisionsteminhiprevisionsurgerymidtermresults
_version_ 1724342907124580352