Modular tapered conical revision stem in hip revision surgery: mid- term results
Abstract Background The aim of this paper is to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of a fluted tapered modular distal-fixation stem at medium to long-term follow-up. The hypothesis of this investigation was to verify if the use of this implant design may have provided potential advantag...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2021-01-01
|
Series: | BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03886-y |
id |
doaj-9d47dda5c1e345b68d818d2d541314e1 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-9d47dda5c1e345b68d818d2d541314e12021-01-10T12:27:09ZengBMCBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders1471-24742021-01-012211810.1186/s12891-020-03886-yModular tapered conical revision stem in hip revision surgery: mid- term resultsLoris Perticarini0Stefano Marco Paolo Rossi1Alberto Fioruzzi2Eugenio Jannelli3Mario Mosconi4Francesco Benazzo5Sezione di Chirurgia Protesica ad Indirizzo Robotico - Unità di Traumatologia dello Sport, U.O. Ortopedia e Traumatologia Fondazione PoliambulanzaSezione di Chirurgia Protesica ad Indirizzo Robotico - Unità di Traumatologia dello Sport, U.O. Ortopedia e Traumatologia Fondazione PoliambulanzaDipartimento dell’Anca e Traumatologico, IRCCS Policlinico San DonatoClinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San MatteoClinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San MatteoSezione di Chirurgia Protesica ad Indirizzo Robotico - Unità di Traumatologia dello Sport, U.O. Ortopedia e Traumatologia Fondazione PoliambulanzaAbstract Background The aim of this paper is to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of a fluted tapered modular distal-fixation stem at medium to long-term follow-up. The hypothesis of this investigation was to verify if the use of this implant design may have provided potential advantages in femoral revisions and post-traumatic instances where the restoration of the anatomy was the prime concern. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 62 cases of femoral revision surgeries, performed in Paprosky type IIIA and IIIB bone defects between January 2001 and December 2011 with a mean follow-up of 8.5 ± 1.5 years (range 5.1–15.9 years) where a modular fluted stem was used. The clinical assessment was performed with the Harris Hip Score (HHS), and the radiographic evaluation was carried in order to assess the stability of the femoral component. Intra-operative and postoperative complications were recorded, and the rates of complications and revisions for any cause were determined. Results Mean HHS improved 35.4 points from the preoperative assessment. Radiographic evaluation showed a stable stem anchorage in 90.3% of the cases at the last follow-up. Five (8%) implants required additional surgery. Neither breakage of the stem nor loosening of the taper junction were recorded. Kaplan-Meier survivorship was 89.4% (CI: 88.8–90%) for any complication and 92.3% (CI: 91.8–92.7%) according to revision for any causes at 81 months follow-up. Conclusions Our findings suggest that this stem design is a reliable option in cases of complex femoral bone defects, as well as in cases with high functional deficiencies, with promising survivorship.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03886-yConical revision stemFemoral bone defectsHip revision surgeryModularityPeriprosthetic femoral fracture |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Loris Perticarini Stefano Marco Paolo Rossi Alberto Fioruzzi Eugenio Jannelli Mario Mosconi Francesco Benazzo |
spellingShingle |
Loris Perticarini Stefano Marco Paolo Rossi Alberto Fioruzzi Eugenio Jannelli Mario Mosconi Francesco Benazzo Modular tapered conical revision stem in hip revision surgery: mid- term results BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders Conical revision stem Femoral bone defects Hip revision surgery Modularity Periprosthetic femoral fracture |
author_facet |
Loris Perticarini Stefano Marco Paolo Rossi Alberto Fioruzzi Eugenio Jannelli Mario Mosconi Francesco Benazzo |
author_sort |
Loris Perticarini |
title |
Modular tapered conical revision stem in hip revision surgery: mid- term results |
title_short |
Modular tapered conical revision stem in hip revision surgery: mid- term results |
title_full |
Modular tapered conical revision stem in hip revision surgery: mid- term results |
title_fullStr |
Modular tapered conical revision stem in hip revision surgery: mid- term results |
title_full_unstemmed |
Modular tapered conical revision stem in hip revision surgery: mid- term results |
title_sort |
modular tapered conical revision stem in hip revision surgery: mid- term results |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders |
issn |
1471-2474 |
publishDate |
2021-01-01 |
description |
Abstract Background The aim of this paper is to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of a fluted tapered modular distal-fixation stem at medium to long-term follow-up. The hypothesis of this investigation was to verify if the use of this implant design may have provided potential advantages in femoral revisions and post-traumatic instances where the restoration of the anatomy was the prime concern. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 62 cases of femoral revision surgeries, performed in Paprosky type IIIA and IIIB bone defects between January 2001 and December 2011 with a mean follow-up of 8.5 ± 1.5 years (range 5.1–15.9 years) where a modular fluted stem was used. The clinical assessment was performed with the Harris Hip Score (HHS), and the radiographic evaluation was carried in order to assess the stability of the femoral component. Intra-operative and postoperative complications were recorded, and the rates of complications and revisions for any cause were determined. Results Mean HHS improved 35.4 points from the preoperative assessment. Radiographic evaluation showed a stable stem anchorage in 90.3% of the cases at the last follow-up. Five (8%) implants required additional surgery. Neither breakage of the stem nor loosening of the taper junction were recorded. Kaplan-Meier survivorship was 89.4% (CI: 88.8–90%) for any complication and 92.3% (CI: 91.8–92.7%) according to revision for any causes at 81 months follow-up. Conclusions Our findings suggest that this stem design is a reliable option in cases of complex femoral bone defects, as well as in cases with high functional deficiencies, with promising survivorship. |
topic |
Conical revision stem Femoral bone defects Hip revision surgery Modularity Periprosthetic femoral fracture |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03886-y |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT lorisperticarini modulartaperedconicalrevisionsteminhiprevisionsurgerymidtermresults AT stefanomarcopaolorossi modulartaperedconicalrevisionsteminhiprevisionsurgerymidtermresults AT albertofioruzzi modulartaperedconicalrevisionsteminhiprevisionsurgerymidtermresults AT eugeniojannelli modulartaperedconicalrevisionsteminhiprevisionsurgerymidtermresults AT mariomosconi modulartaperedconicalrevisionsteminhiprevisionsurgerymidtermresults AT francescobenazzo modulartaperedconicalrevisionsteminhiprevisionsurgerymidtermresults |
_version_ |
1724342907124580352 |