A comparative evaluation of sealability of three different obturation techniques using rotary instrumentation for canal preparation

Introduction: A well-fitted root canal filling prevents percolation and microleakage of periapical exudate into the root canal space, prevents reinfection and creates a favorable biological environment for healing to take place. Several techniques using gutta-percha have been used in an attempt to a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kitty Sidhu, B K Raghavendera Rao, Soheyl Sheikh, Neha Bansal, Ritika Bahuguna
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2015-01-01
Series:The Saint's International Dental Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sidj.org/article.asp?issn=2454-3160;year=2015;volume=1;issue=1;spage=33;epage=38;aulast=Sidhu
id doaj-9d31dce2e9394a47bc7996df7ca8f08c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9d31dce2e9394a47bc7996df7ca8f08c2021-07-07T14:32:50ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsThe Saint's International Dental Journal2454-31602589-73732015-01-0111333810.4103/2454-3160.161799A comparative evaluation of sealability of three different obturation techniques using rotary instrumentation for canal preparationKitty SidhuB K Raghavendera RaoSoheyl SheikhNeha BansalRitika BahugunaIntroduction: A well-fitted root canal filling prevents percolation and microleakage of periapical exudate into the root canal space, prevents reinfection and creates a favorable biological environment for healing to take place. Several techniques using gutta-percha have been used in an attempt to achieve a void-free, homogeneous filling. Aim: Three different obturation techniques that are Thermafil obturation, cold lateral condensation and warm vertical condensation using rotary canal technique were compared. Materials and Methods: This study was in vitro study. Forty-five extracted permanent human premolars with single canal, and fully developed apices were selected for the study. Statistical Analysis: This was done with the help of analysis of variance. Results: There was leakage measuring 0.5-3.5 mm in 73.3% of roots in group I, 80% in group II and 40% in group III. Similarly, the leakage was 3.51-6.5 mm in 20% of the roots in group I, 13.3% in group II and group III. The leakage was found to be more than 6.5 mm in 6.7% of the roots in group I and II and 46.7% in group III. There was sealer extrusion in two teeth in group I and II and in four teeth in group III. Conclusions: It was observed that the warm vertical condensation and lateral condensation techniques were more effective in restricting apical dye penetration. However, the results of this in vitro study need to be confirmed by further in vivo research.http://www.sidj.org/article.asp?issn=2454-3160;year=2015;volume=1;issue=1;spage=33;epage=38;aulast=Sidhuleakageobturationrotary
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kitty Sidhu
B K Raghavendera Rao
Soheyl Sheikh
Neha Bansal
Ritika Bahuguna
spellingShingle Kitty Sidhu
B K Raghavendera Rao
Soheyl Sheikh
Neha Bansal
Ritika Bahuguna
A comparative evaluation of sealability of three different obturation techniques using rotary instrumentation for canal preparation
The Saint's International Dental Journal
leakage
obturation
rotary
author_facet Kitty Sidhu
B K Raghavendera Rao
Soheyl Sheikh
Neha Bansal
Ritika Bahuguna
author_sort Kitty Sidhu
title A comparative evaluation of sealability of three different obturation techniques using rotary instrumentation for canal preparation
title_short A comparative evaluation of sealability of three different obturation techniques using rotary instrumentation for canal preparation
title_full A comparative evaluation of sealability of three different obturation techniques using rotary instrumentation for canal preparation
title_fullStr A comparative evaluation of sealability of three different obturation techniques using rotary instrumentation for canal preparation
title_full_unstemmed A comparative evaluation of sealability of three different obturation techniques using rotary instrumentation for canal preparation
title_sort comparative evaluation of sealability of three different obturation techniques using rotary instrumentation for canal preparation
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series The Saint's International Dental Journal
issn 2454-3160
2589-7373
publishDate 2015-01-01
description Introduction: A well-fitted root canal filling prevents percolation and microleakage of periapical exudate into the root canal space, prevents reinfection and creates a favorable biological environment for healing to take place. Several techniques using gutta-percha have been used in an attempt to achieve a void-free, homogeneous filling. Aim: Three different obturation techniques that are Thermafil obturation, cold lateral condensation and warm vertical condensation using rotary canal technique were compared. Materials and Methods: This study was in vitro study. Forty-five extracted permanent human premolars with single canal, and fully developed apices were selected for the study. Statistical Analysis: This was done with the help of analysis of variance. Results: There was leakage measuring 0.5-3.5 mm in 73.3% of roots in group I, 80% in group II and 40% in group III. Similarly, the leakage was 3.51-6.5 mm in 20% of the roots in group I, 13.3% in group II and group III. The leakage was found to be more than 6.5 mm in 6.7% of the roots in group I and II and 46.7% in group III. There was sealer extrusion in two teeth in group I and II and in four teeth in group III. Conclusions: It was observed that the warm vertical condensation and lateral condensation techniques were more effective in restricting apical dye penetration. However, the results of this in vitro study need to be confirmed by further in vivo research.
topic leakage
obturation
rotary
url http://www.sidj.org/article.asp?issn=2454-3160;year=2015;volume=1;issue=1;spage=33;epage=38;aulast=Sidhu
work_keys_str_mv AT kittysidhu acomparativeevaluationofsealabilityofthreedifferentobturationtechniquesusingrotaryinstrumentationforcanalpreparation
AT bkraghavenderarao acomparativeevaluationofsealabilityofthreedifferentobturationtechniquesusingrotaryinstrumentationforcanalpreparation
AT soheylsheikh acomparativeevaluationofsealabilityofthreedifferentobturationtechniquesusingrotaryinstrumentationforcanalpreparation
AT nehabansal acomparativeevaluationofsealabilityofthreedifferentobturationtechniquesusingrotaryinstrumentationforcanalpreparation
AT ritikabahuguna acomparativeevaluationofsealabilityofthreedifferentobturationtechniquesusingrotaryinstrumentationforcanalpreparation
AT kittysidhu comparativeevaluationofsealabilityofthreedifferentobturationtechniquesusingrotaryinstrumentationforcanalpreparation
AT bkraghavenderarao comparativeevaluationofsealabilityofthreedifferentobturationtechniquesusingrotaryinstrumentationforcanalpreparation
AT soheylsheikh comparativeevaluationofsealabilityofthreedifferentobturationtechniquesusingrotaryinstrumentationforcanalpreparation
AT nehabansal comparativeevaluationofsealabilityofthreedifferentobturationtechniquesusingrotaryinstrumentationforcanalpreparation
AT ritikabahuguna comparativeevaluationofsealabilityofthreedifferentobturationtechniquesusingrotaryinstrumentationforcanalpreparation
_version_ 1721315198841651200