A comparative evaluation of sealability of three different obturation techniques using rotary instrumentation for canal preparation
Introduction: A well-fitted root canal filling prevents percolation and microleakage of periapical exudate into the root canal space, prevents reinfection and creates a favorable biological environment for healing to take place. Several techniques using gutta-percha have been used in an attempt to a...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2015-01-01
|
Series: | The Saint's International Dental Journal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sidj.org/article.asp?issn=2454-3160;year=2015;volume=1;issue=1;spage=33;epage=38;aulast=Sidhu |
id |
doaj-9d31dce2e9394a47bc7996df7ca8f08c |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-9d31dce2e9394a47bc7996df7ca8f08c2021-07-07T14:32:50ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsThe Saint's International Dental Journal2454-31602589-73732015-01-0111333810.4103/2454-3160.161799A comparative evaluation of sealability of three different obturation techniques using rotary instrumentation for canal preparationKitty SidhuB K Raghavendera RaoSoheyl SheikhNeha BansalRitika BahugunaIntroduction: A well-fitted root canal filling prevents percolation and microleakage of periapical exudate into the root canal space, prevents reinfection and creates a favorable biological environment for healing to take place. Several techniques using gutta-percha have been used in an attempt to achieve a void-free, homogeneous filling. Aim: Three different obturation techniques that are Thermafil obturation, cold lateral condensation and warm vertical condensation using rotary canal technique were compared. Materials and Methods: This study was in vitro study. Forty-five extracted permanent human premolars with single canal, and fully developed apices were selected for the study. Statistical Analysis: This was done with the help of analysis of variance. Results: There was leakage measuring 0.5-3.5 mm in 73.3% of roots in group I, 80% in group II and 40% in group III. Similarly, the leakage was 3.51-6.5 mm in 20% of the roots in group I, 13.3% in group II and group III. The leakage was found to be more than 6.5 mm in 6.7% of the roots in group I and II and 46.7% in group III. There was sealer extrusion in two teeth in group I and II and in four teeth in group III. Conclusions: It was observed that the warm vertical condensation and lateral condensation techniques were more effective in restricting apical dye penetration. However, the results of this in vitro study need to be confirmed by further in vivo research.http://www.sidj.org/article.asp?issn=2454-3160;year=2015;volume=1;issue=1;spage=33;epage=38;aulast=Sidhuleakageobturationrotary |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Kitty Sidhu B K Raghavendera Rao Soheyl Sheikh Neha Bansal Ritika Bahuguna |
spellingShingle |
Kitty Sidhu B K Raghavendera Rao Soheyl Sheikh Neha Bansal Ritika Bahuguna A comparative evaluation of sealability of three different obturation techniques using rotary instrumentation for canal preparation The Saint's International Dental Journal leakage obturation rotary |
author_facet |
Kitty Sidhu B K Raghavendera Rao Soheyl Sheikh Neha Bansal Ritika Bahuguna |
author_sort |
Kitty Sidhu |
title |
A comparative evaluation of sealability of three different obturation techniques using rotary instrumentation for canal preparation |
title_short |
A comparative evaluation of sealability of three different obturation techniques using rotary instrumentation for canal preparation |
title_full |
A comparative evaluation of sealability of three different obturation techniques using rotary instrumentation for canal preparation |
title_fullStr |
A comparative evaluation of sealability of three different obturation techniques using rotary instrumentation for canal preparation |
title_full_unstemmed |
A comparative evaluation of sealability of three different obturation techniques using rotary instrumentation for canal preparation |
title_sort |
comparative evaluation of sealability of three different obturation techniques using rotary instrumentation for canal preparation |
publisher |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
series |
The Saint's International Dental Journal |
issn |
2454-3160 2589-7373 |
publishDate |
2015-01-01 |
description |
Introduction: A well-fitted root canal filling prevents percolation and microleakage of periapical exudate into the root canal space, prevents reinfection and creates a favorable biological environment for healing to take place. Several techniques using gutta-percha have been used in an attempt to achieve a void-free, homogeneous filling.
Aim: Three different obturation techniques that are Thermafil obturation, cold lateral condensation and warm vertical condensation using rotary canal technique were compared.
Materials and Methods: This study was in vitro study. Forty-five extracted permanent human premolars with single canal, and fully developed apices were selected for the study.
Statistical Analysis: This was done with the help of analysis of variance.
Results: There was leakage measuring 0.5-3.5 mm in 73.3% of roots in group I, 80% in group II and 40% in group III. Similarly, the leakage was 3.51-6.5 mm in 20% of the roots in group I, 13.3% in group II and group III. The leakage was found to be more than 6.5 mm in 6.7% of the roots in group I and II and 46.7% in group III. There was sealer extrusion in two teeth in group I and II and in four teeth in group III.
Conclusions: It was observed that the warm vertical condensation and lateral condensation techniques were more effective in restricting apical dye penetration. However, the results of this in vitro study need to be confirmed by further in vivo research. |
topic |
leakage obturation rotary |
url |
http://www.sidj.org/article.asp?issn=2454-3160;year=2015;volume=1;issue=1;spage=33;epage=38;aulast=Sidhu |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT kittysidhu acomparativeevaluationofsealabilityofthreedifferentobturationtechniquesusingrotaryinstrumentationforcanalpreparation AT bkraghavenderarao acomparativeevaluationofsealabilityofthreedifferentobturationtechniquesusingrotaryinstrumentationforcanalpreparation AT soheylsheikh acomparativeevaluationofsealabilityofthreedifferentobturationtechniquesusingrotaryinstrumentationforcanalpreparation AT nehabansal acomparativeevaluationofsealabilityofthreedifferentobturationtechniquesusingrotaryinstrumentationforcanalpreparation AT ritikabahuguna acomparativeevaluationofsealabilityofthreedifferentobturationtechniquesusingrotaryinstrumentationforcanalpreparation AT kittysidhu comparativeevaluationofsealabilityofthreedifferentobturationtechniquesusingrotaryinstrumentationforcanalpreparation AT bkraghavenderarao comparativeevaluationofsealabilityofthreedifferentobturationtechniquesusingrotaryinstrumentationforcanalpreparation AT soheylsheikh comparativeevaluationofsealabilityofthreedifferentobturationtechniquesusingrotaryinstrumentationforcanalpreparation AT nehabansal comparativeevaluationofsealabilityofthreedifferentobturationtechniquesusingrotaryinstrumentationforcanalpreparation AT ritikabahuguna comparativeevaluationofsealabilityofthreedifferentobturationtechniquesusingrotaryinstrumentationforcanalpreparation |
_version_ |
1721315198841651200 |