Comparisons of feature extraction algorithm based on unmanned aerial vehicle image
Feature point extraction technology has become a research hotspot in the photogrammetry and computer vision. The commonly used point feature extraction operators are SIFT operator, Forstner operator, Harris operator and Moravec operator, etc. With the high spatial resolution characteristics, UAV ima...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
De Gruyter
2017-07-01
|
Series: | Open Physics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1515/phys-2017-0053 |
id |
doaj-9d2b315626c248f5a39a3e0a3c40338d |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-9d2b315626c248f5a39a3e0a3c40338d2021-09-05T13:59:34ZengDe GruyterOpen Physics2391-54712017-07-0115147247810.1515/phys-2017-0053phys-2017-0053Comparisons of feature extraction algorithm based on unmanned aerial vehicle imageXi Wenfei0Shi Zhengtao1Li Dongsheng2College of Tourism and Geographic Sciences, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming 650050, Yunnan, ChinaCollege of Tourism and Geographic Sciences, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming 650050, Yunnan, ChinaKunming Metallurgy College, Kunming 650033, Yunnan, ChinaFeature point extraction technology has become a research hotspot in the photogrammetry and computer vision. The commonly used point feature extraction operators are SIFT operator, Forstner operator, Harris operator and Moravec operator, etc. With the high spatial resolution characteristics, UAV image is different from the traditional aviation image. Based on these characteristics of the unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), this paper uses several operators referred above to extract feature points from the building images, grassland images, shrubbery images, and vegetable greenhouses images. Through the practical case analysis, the performance, advantages, disadvantages and adaptability of each algorithm are compared and analyzed by considering their speed and accuracy. Finally, the suggestions of how to adapt different algorithms in diverse environment are proposed.https://doi.org/10.1515/phys-2017-0053feature point extractionsift operatorforstner operatorharris operatormoravec operator89.20.bb89.20.ff |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Xi Wenfei Shi Zhengtao Li Dongsheng |
spellingShingle |
Xi Wenfei Shi Zhengtao Li Dongsheng Comparisons of feature extraction algorithm based on unmanned aerial vehicle image Open Physics feature point extraction sift operator forstner operator harris operator moravec operator 89.20.bb 89.20.ff |
author_facet |
Xi Wenfei Shi Zhengtao Li Dongsheng |
author_sort |
Xi Wenfei |
title |
Comparisons of feature extraction algorithm based on unmanned aerial vehicle image |
title_short |
Comparisons of feature extraction algorithm based on unmanned aerial vehicle image |
title_full |
Comparisons of feature extraction algorithm based on unmanned aerial vehicle image |
title_fullStr |
Comparisons of feature extraction algorithm based on unmanned aerial vehicle image |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparisons of feature extraction algorithm based on unmanned aerial vehicle image |
title_sort |
comparisons of feature extraction algorithm based on unmanned aerial vehicle image |
publisher |
De Gruyter |
series |
Open Physics |
issn |
2391-5471 |
publishDate |
2017-07-01 |
description |
Feature point extraction technology has become a research hotspot in the photogrammetry and computer vision. The commonly used point feature extraction operators are SIFT operator, Forstner operator, Harris operator and Moravec operator, etc. With the high spatial resolution characteristics, UAV image is different from the traditional aviation image. Based on these characteristics of the unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), this paper uses several operators referred above to extract feature points from the building images, grassland images, shrubbery images, and vegetable greenhouses images. Through the practical case analysis, the performance, advantages, disadvantages and adaptability of each algorithm are compared and analyzed by considering their speed and accuracy. Finally, the suggestions of how to adapt different algorithms in diverse environment are proposed. |
topic |
feature point extraction sift operator forstner operator harris operator moravec operator 89.20.bb 89.20.ff |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1515/phys-2017-0053 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT xiwenfei comparisonsoffeatureextractionalgorithmbasedonunmannedaerialvehicleimage AT shizhengtao comparisonsoffeatureextractionalgorithmbasedonunmannedaerialvehicleimage AT lidongsheng comparisonsoffeatureextractionalgorithmbasedonunmannedaerialvehicleimage |
_version_ |
1717813417235972096 |