A Claim Forfeiting Its Own Right. Why Job Got It Wrong—and Why This Matters for the Rationality of Religion
The article aims to uncover a deep ambivalence in the figure of Job, as it is presented in the book of the same title, especially in the latter’s “poetry” or dialogue section. This ambivalence corresponds to and in fact emerges from what appears to be a pragmatic parado...
Main Author: | Heiko Schulz |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2019-03-01
|
Series: | Religions |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/10/3/201 |
Similar Items
-
Why and how to be a Dialetheist
by: Manuel Bremer
Published: (2008-12-01) -
Deleuze’s Interpretation of Job as a Heroic Figure in the History of Rationality
by: Bradley H. McLean
Published: (2019-02-01) -
Job and Ecclesiastes as (postmodern?) wisdom in revolt
by: Leon A. Roper, et al.
Published: (2013-09-01) -
El déficit del querer en Kierkegaard. Clarificación del concepto de «voluntad» en La enfermedad mortal
by: Pablo Uriel Rodríguez
Published: (2015-06-01) -
Effect of assertiveness skill training on the staffs' stress at the emergency medical center
by: Hadi Mohammadpour, et al.
Published: (2018-11-01)