A Novel Nonpedicular Screw-Based Fixation in Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
Objective. The authors present the clinical results obtained in patients who underwent interspinous fusion device (IFD) implantation following posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). The purpose of this study is investigating the feasibility of IFD with PLIF in the treatment of lumbar spondylolist...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi Limited
2017-01-01
|
Series: | BioMed Research International |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/5619350 |
id |
doaj-9d252c52eea348b189c54feda47caf86 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-9d252c52eea348b189c54feda47caf862020-11-24T22:35:42ZengHindawi LimitedBioMed Research International2314-61332314-61412017-01-01201710.1155/2017/56193505619350A Novel Nonpedicular Screw-Based Fixation in Lumbar SpondylolisthesisMing-Hong Chen0Jen-Yuh Chen1Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Cathay General Hospital, Taipei, TaiwanDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, TaiwanObjective. The authors present the clinical results obtained in patients who underwent interspinous fusion device (IFD) implantation following posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). The purpose of this study is investigating the feasibility of IFD with PLIF in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis. Methods. Between September 2013 and November 2014, 39 patients underwent PLIF and subsequent IFD (Romeo®2 PAD, Spineart, Geneva, Switzerland) implantation. Medical records of these patients were retrospectively reviewed to collect relevant data such as blood loss, operative time, and length of hospital stay. Radiographs and clinical outcome were evaluated 6 weeks and 12 months after surgery. Results. All 39 patients were followed up for more than one year. There were no major complications such as dura tear, nerve injuries, cerebrospinal fluid leakage, or deep infection. Both interbody and interspinous fusion could be observed on radiographs one year after surgery. However, there were 5 patients having early retropulsion of interbody fusion devices. Conclusion. The interspinous fusion device appears to achieve posterior fixation and facilitate lumbar fusion in selected patients. However, further study is mandatory for proposing a novel anatomic and radiological scoring system to identify patients suitable for this treatment modality and prevent postoperative complications.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/5619350 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Ming-Hong Chen Jen-Yuh Chen |
spellingShingle |
Ming-Hong Chen Jen-Yuh Chen A Novel Nonpedicular Screw-Based Fixation in Lumbar Spondylolisthesis BioMed Research International |
author_facet |
Ming-Hong Chen Jen-Yuh Chen |
author_sort |
Ming-Hong Chen |
title |
A Novel Nonpedicular Screw-Based Fixation in Lumbar Spondylolisthesis |
title_short |
A Novel Nonpedicular Screw-Based Fixation in Lumbar Spondylolisthesis |
title_full |
A Novel Nonpedicular Screw-Based Fixation in Lumbar Spondylolisthesis |
title_fullStr |
A Novel Nonpedicular Screw-Based Fixation in Lumbar Spondylolisthesis |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Novel Nonpedicular Screw-Based Fixation in Lumbar Spondylolisthesis |
title_sort |
novel nonpedicular screw-based fixation in lumbar spondylolisthesis |
publisher |
Hindawi Limited |
series |
BioMed Research International |
issn |
2314-6133 2314-6141 |
publishDate |
2017-01-01 |
description |
Objective. The authors present the clinical results obtained in patients who underwent interspinous fusion device (IFD) implantation following posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). The purpose of this study is investigating the feasibility of IFD with PLIF in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis. Methods. Between September 2013 and November 2014, 39 patients underwent PLIF and subsequent IFD (Romeo®2 PAD, Spineart, Geneva, Switzerland) implantation. Medical records of these patients were retrospectively reviewed to collect relevant data such as blood loss, operative time, and length of hospital stay. Radiographs and clinical outcome were evaluated 6 weeks and 12 months after surgery. Results. All 39 patients were followed up for more than one year. There were no major complications such as dura tear, nerve injuries, cerebrospinal fluid leakage, or deep infection. Both interbody and interspinous fusion could be observed on radiographs one year after surgery. However, there were 5 patients having early retropulsion of interbody fusion devices. Conclusion. The interspinous fusion device appears to achieve posterior fixation and facilitate lumbar fusion in selected patients. However, further study is mandatory for proposing a novel anatomic and radiological scoring system to identify patients suitable for this treatment modality and prevent postoperative complications. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/5619350 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT minghongchen anovelnonpedicularscrewbasedfixationinlumbarspondylolisthesis AT jenyuhchen anovelnonpedicularscrewbasedfixationinlumbarspondylolisthesis AT minghongchen novelnonpedicularscrewbasedfixationinlumbarspondylolisthesis AT jenyuhchen novelnonpedicularscrewbasedfixationinlumbarspondylolisthesis |
_version_ |
1725723152326066176 |