A Novel Nonpedicular Screw-Based Fixation in Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

Objective. The authors present the clinical results obtained in patients who underwent interspinous fusion device (IFD) implantation following posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). The purpose of this study is investigating the feasibility of IFD with PLIF in the treatment of lumbar spondylolist...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ming-Hong Chen, Jen-Yuh Chen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2017-01-01
Series:BioMed Research International
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/5619350
id doaj-9d252c52eea348b189c54feda47caf86
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9d252c52eea348b189c54feda47caf862020-11-24T22:35:42ZengHindawi LimitedBioMed Research International2314-61332314-61412017-01-01201710.1155/2017/56193505619350A Novel Nonpedicular Screw-Based Fixation in Lumbar SpondylolisthesisMing-Hong Chen0Jen-Yuh Chen1Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Cathay General Hospital, Taipei, TaiwanDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, TaiwanObjective. The authors present the clinical results obtained in patients who underwent interspinous fusion device (IFD) implantation following posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). The purpose of this study is investigating the feasibility of IFD with PLIF in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis. Methods. Between September 2013 and November 2014, 39 patients underwent PLIF and subsequent IFD (Romeo®2 PAD, Spineart, Geneva, Switzerland) implantation. Medical records of these patients were retrospectively reviewed to collect relevant data such as blood loss, operative time, and length of hospital stay. Radiographs and clinical outcome were evaluated 6 weeks and 12 months after surgery. Results. All 39 patients were followed up for more than one year. There were no major complications such as dura tear, nerve injuries, cerebrospinal fluid leakage, or deep infection. Both interbody and interspinous fusion could be observed on radiographs one year after surgery. However, there were 5 patients having early retropulsion of interbody fusion devices. Conclusion. The interspinous fusion device appears to achieve posterior fixation and facilitate lumbar fusion in selected patients. However, further study is mandatory for proposing a novel anatomic and radiological scoring system to identify patients suitable for this treatment modality and prevent postoperative complications.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/5619350
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ming-Hong Chen
Jen-Yuh Chen
spellingShingle Ming-Hong Chen
Jen-Yuh Chen
A Novel Nonpedicular Screw-Based Fixation in Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
BioMed Research International
author_facet Ming-Hong Chen
Jen-Yuh Chen
author_sort Ming-Hong Chen
title A Novel Nonpedicular Screw-Based Fixation in Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
title_short A Novel Nonpedicular Screw-Based Fixation in Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
title_full A Novel Nonpedicular Screw-Based Fixation in Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
title_fullStr A Novel Nonpedicular Screw-Based Fixation in Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
title_full_unstemmed A Novel Nonpedicular Screw-Based Fixation in Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
title_sort novel nonpedicular screw-based fixation in lumbar spondylolisthesis
publisher Hindawi Limited
series BioMed Research International
issn 2314-6133
2314-6141
publishDate 2017-01-01
description Objective. The authors present the clinical results obtained in patients who underwent interspinous fusion device (IFD) implantation following posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). The purpose of this study is investigating the feasibility of IFD with PLIF in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis. Methods. Between September 2013 and November 2014, 39 patients underwent PLIF and subsequent IFD (Romeo®2 PAD, Spineart, Geneva, Switzerland) implantation. Medical records of these patients were retrospectively reviewed to collect relevant data such as blood loss, operative time, and length of hospital stay. Radiographs and clinical outcome were evaluated 6 weeks and 12 months after surgery. Results. All 39 patients were followed up for more than one year. There were no major complications such as dura tear, nerve injuries, cerebrospinal fluid leakage, or deep infection. Both interbody and interspinous fusion could be observed on radiographs one year after surgery. However, there were 5 patients having early retropulsion of interbody fusion devices. Conclusion. The interspinous fusion device appears to achieve posterior fixation and facilitate lumbar fusion in selected patients. However, further study is mandatory for proposing a novel anatomic and radiological scoring system to identify patients suitable for this treatment modality and prevent postoperative complications.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/5619350
work_keys_str_mv AT minghongchen anovelnonpedicularscrewbasedfixationinlumbarspondylolisthesis
AT jenyuhchen anovelnonpedicularscrewbasedfixationinlumbarspondylolisthesis
AT minghongchen novelnonpedicularscrewbasedfixationinlumbarspondylolisthesis
AT jenyuhchen novelnonpedicularscrewbasedfixationinlumbarspondylolisthesis
_version_ 1725723152326066176