Notes sur deux énigmes concernant Le Printemps d’Yver

Two questions left unresolved in (he existing editions of Le Printemps d’Yver are investigated: firstly the probable date of the episode described by Yvcr, and secondly the prevailing doubts as to whether or not the work is complete in its present form. Correlating the dates of the ceasefires during...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: C. Cordell, D. Godwin
Format: Article
Language:Afrikaans
Published: AOSIS 1992-05-01
Series:Literator
Online Access:https://literator.org.za/index.php/literator/article/view/726
id doaj-9d19a07678fa4761a86b69f48eebf193
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9d19a07678fa4761a86b69f48eebf1932020-11-24T23:03:42ZafrAOSISLiterator0258-22792219-82371992-05-011319310010.4102/lit.v13i1.726666Notes sur deux énigmes concernant Le Printemps d’YverC. Cordell0D. Godwin1Rand Afrikaans UniversityRand Afrikaans UniversityTwo questions left unresolved in (he existing editions of Le Printemps d’Yver are investigated: firstly the probable date of the episode described by Yvcr, and secondly the prevailing doubts as to whether or not the work is complete in its present form. Correlating the dates of the ceasefires during the Religious Wars, the publication of Yver's work and the estimated time of his death suggests that the frame story might have been set at Whitsuntide, 1571. The second question of the novel's completeness is, of course, crucial for a full appreciation of the author and his Le Printemps. The structure of a frame-novel that almost certainly served as a model for Yver’s own composition is considered in conjunction with the French work. In addition, thematic elements relating to Venus, the goddess of love, are examined both in the frame story and the enclosed tales as further evidence of structural unity in the book. It is then argued that Le Printemps, far from being incomplete, is a neatly constructed, tightly-woven and finished artistic product.https://literator.org.za/index.php/literator/article/view/726
collection DOAJ
language Afrikaans
format Article
sources DOAJ
author C. Cordell
D. Godwin
spellingShingle C. Cordell
D. Godwin
Notes sur deux énigmes concernant Le Printemps d’Yver
Literator
author_facet C. Cordell
D. Godwin
author_sort C. Cordell
title Notes sur deux énigmes concernant Le Printemps d’Yver
title_short Notes sur deux énigmes concernant Le Printemps d’Yver
title_full Notes sur deux énigmes concernant Le Printemps d’Yver
title_fullStr Notes sur deux énigmes concernant Le Printemps d’Yver
title_full_unstemmed Notes sur deux énigmes concernant Le Printemps d’Yver
title_sort notes sur deux énigmes concernant le printemps d’yver
publisher AOSIS
series Literator
issn 0258-2279
2219-8237
publishDate 1992-05-01
description Two questions left unresolved in (he existing editions of Le Printemps d’Yver are investigated: firstly the probable date of the episode described by Yvcr, and secondly the prevailing doubts as to whether or not the work is complete in its present form. Correlating the dates of the ceasefires during the Religious Wars, the publication of Yver's work and the estimated time of his death suggests that the frame story might have been set at Whitsuntide, 1571. The second question of the novel's completeness is, of course, crucial for a full appreciation of the author and his Le Printemps. The structure of a frame-novel that almost certainly served as a model for Yver’s own composition is considered in conjunction with the French work. In addition, thematic elements relating to Venus, the goddess of love, are examined both in the frame story and the enclosed tales as further evidence of structural unity in the book. It is then argued that Le Printemps, far from being incomplete, is a neatly constructed, tightly-woven and finished artistic product.
url https://literator.org.za/index.php/literator/article/view/726
work_keys_str_mv AT ccordell notessurdeuxenigmesconcernantleprintempsdyver
AT dgodwin notessurdeuxenigmesconcernantleprintempsdyver
_version_ 1725632584079114240