Effects of carrying a pregnancy and of method of delivery on urinary incontinence: a prospective cohort study

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>This study was carried out to identify risk factors associated with urinary incontinence in women three months after giving birth.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Urinary incontinence before and during pregnancy was ass...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mondor Myrto, Marcoux Sylvie, Labrecque Michel, Eason Erica
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2004-02-01
Series:BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/4/4
id doaj-9d0ec9695c87486f90b28009a91add2b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9d0ec9695c87486f90b28009a91add2b2020-11-24T21:04:31ZengBMCBMC Pregnancy and Childbirth1471-23932004-02-0141410.1186/1471-2393-4-4Effects of carrying a pregnancy and of method of delivery on urinary incontinence: a prospective cohort studyMondor MyrtoMarcoux SylvieLabrecque MichelEason Erica<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>This study was carried out to identify risk factors associated with urinary incontinence in women three months after giving birth.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Urinary incontinence before and during pregnancy was assessed at study enrolment early in the third trimester. Incontinence was re-assessed three months postpartum. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the role of maternal and obstetric factors in causing postpartum urinary incontinence. This prospective cohort study in 949 pregnant women in Quebec, Canada was nested within a randomised controlled trial of prenatal perineal massage.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Postpartum urinary incontinence was increased with prepregnancy incontinence (adjusted odds ratio [adj0R] 6.44, 95% CI 4.15, 9.98), incontinence beginning during pregnancy (adjOR 1.93, 95% CI 1.32, 2.83), and higher prepregnancy body mass index (adjOR 1.07/unit of BMI, 95% CI 1.03,1.11). Caesarean section was highly protective (adjOR 0.27, 95% CI 0.14, 0.50). While there was a trend towards increasing incontinence with forceps delivery (adjOR 1.73, 95% CI 0.96, 3.13) this was not statistically significant. The weight of the baby, episiotomy, the length of the second stage of labour, and epidural analgesia were not predictive of urinary incontinence. Nor was prenatal perineal massage, the randomised controlled trial intervention. When the analysis was limited to women having their first vaginal birth, the same risk factors were important, with similar adjusted odds ratios.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Urinary incontinence during pregnancy is extremely common, affecting over half of pregnant women. Urinary incontinence beginning during pregnancy roughly doubles the likelihood of urinary incontinence at 3 months postpartum, regardless whether delivery is vaginal or by Caesarean section.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/4/4
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mondor Myrto
Marcoux Sylvie
Labrecque Michel
Eason Erica
spellingShingle Mondor Myrto
Marcoux Sylvie
Labrecque Michel
Eason Erica
Effects of carrying a pregnancy and of method of delivery on urinary incontinence: a prospective cohort study
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
author_facet Mondor Myrto
Marcoux Sylvie
Labrecque Michel
Eason Erica
author_sort Mondor Myrto
title Effects of carrying a pregnancy and of method of delivery on urinary incontinence: a prospective cohort study
title_short Effects of carrying a pregnancy and of method of delivery on urinary incontinence: a prospective cohort study
title_full Effects of carrying a pregnancy and of method of delivery on urinary incontinence: a prospective cohort study
title_fullStr Effects of carrying a pregnancy and of method of delivery on urinary incontinence: a prospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Effects of carrying a pregnancy and of method of delivery on urinary incontinence: a prospective cohort study
title_sort effects of carrying a pregnancy and of method of delivery on urinary incontinence: a prospective cohort study
publisher BMC
series BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
issn 1471-2393
publishDate 2004-02-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>This study was carried out to identify risk factors associated with urinary incontinence in women three months after giving birth.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Urinary incontinence before and during pregnancy was assessed at study enrolment early in the third trimester. Incontinence was re-assessed three months postpartum. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the role of maternal and obstetric factors in causing postpartum urinary incontinence. This prospective cohort study in 949 pregnant women in Quebec, Canada was nested within a randomised controlled trial of prenatal perineal massage.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Postpartum urinary incontinence was increased with prepregnancy incontinence (adjusted odds ratio [adj0R] 6.44, 95% CI 4.15, 9.98), incontinence beginning during pregnancy (adjOR 1.93, 95% CI 1.32, 2.83), and higher prepregnancy body mass index (adjOR 1.07/unit of BMI, 95% CI 1.03,1.11). Caesarean section was highly protective (adjOR 0.27, 95% CI 0.14, 0.50). While there was a trend towards increasing incontinence with forceps delivery (adjOR 1.73, 95% CI 0.96, 3.13) this was not statistically significant. The weight of the baby, episiotomy, the length of the second stage of labour, and epidural analgesia were not predictive of urinary incontinence. Nor was prenatal perineal massage, the randomised controlled trial intervention. When the analysis was limited to women having their first vaginal birth, the same risk factors were important, with similar adjusted odds ratios.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Urinary incontinence during pregnancy is extremely common, affecting over half of pregnant women. Urinary incontinence beginning during pregnancy roughly doubles the likelihood of urinary incontinence at 3 months postpartum, regardless whether delivery is vaginal or by Caesarean section.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/4/4
work_keys_str_mv AT mondormyrto effectsofcarryingapregnancyandofmethodofdeliveryonurinaryincontinenceaprospectivecohortstudy
AT marcouxsylvie effectsofcarryingapregnancyandofmethodofdeliveryonurinaryincontinenceaprospectivecohortstudy
AT labrecquemichel effectsofcarryingapregnancyandofmethodofdeliveryonurinaryincontinenceaprospectivecohortstudy
AT easonerica effectsofcarryingapregnancyandofmethodofdeliveryonurinaryincontinenceaprospectivecohortstudy
_version_ 1716770800420257792