Dynamics of the Type I Interferon Response During Immunosuppressive Therapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Objective: The type I interferon (IFN) response in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has been extensively studied in relation to therapy with biological DMARDs (bDMARDs). However, the effect of conventional synthetic (cs)DMARDs and glucocorticoids (GCs) on IFN response gene (IRG) expression remains largely...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tamarah D. de Jong, Tanja Snoek, Elise Mantel, Conny J. van der Laken, Ronald F. van Vollenhoven, Willem F. Lems
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-04-01
Series:Frontiers in Immunology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fimmu.2019.00902/full
id doaj-9cfc15a3c6364a8fbd5057db1babd900
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9cfc15a3c6364a8fbd5057db1babd9002020-11-24T21:07:00ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Immunology1664-32242019-04-011010.3389/fimmu.2019.00902440401Dynamics of the Type I Interferon Response During Immunosuppressive Therapy in Rheumatoid ArthritisTamarah D. de JongTanja SnoekElise MantelConny J. van der LakenRonald F. van VollenhovenWillem F. LemsObjective: The type I interferon (IFN) response in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has been extensively studied in relation to therapy with biological DMARDs (bDMARDs). However, the effect of conventional synthetic (cs)DMARDs and glucocorticoids (GCs) on IFN response gene (IRG) expression remains largely unknown, even though csDMARDS are used throughout all disease phases, including simultaneously with biologic therapy. This study was aimed to determine the dynamics of IFN response upon immunosuppressive treatment.Methods: Whole blood was collected in PAXgene tubes from 35 RA patients who received either COBRA therapy (combination of prednisone, initially 60 mg, methotrexate and sulfasalazine) (n = 14) or COBRA-light therapy (prednisone, initially 30 mg, and methotrexate) (n = 21). Expression of 10 IRGs was determined by real-time PCR at baseline (T0), after 4 weeks (T4), and 13 weeks (T13) of treatment. IRG selection was based on the differential presence of transcription factor binding sites (TFBS), in order to study the therapy effect on different pathway components involved in IFN signaling.Results: Seven of the 10 IRGs displayed significant changes during treatment (p ≤ 0.016). These 7 IRGs all displayed a particularly pronounced decrease between T0 and T4 (≥1.6-fold, p ≤ 0.0059). The differences between IRG sensitivity to the treatment appeared related to the presence of TFBS for STAT1 and IRF proteins within the genes. The extent of the decreases between T0 and T4 was similar for the COBRA- and COBRA-light-treated group, despite the differences in drug combination and doses in those groups. Between T4 and T13, however, IRG expression in the COBRA-light-treated group displayed a significant increase, whereas it remained stable or decreased even further in most COBRA-treated patients (comparison of mean fold changes, p = 0.011). A significant association between IRG dynamics and clinical response to therapy was not detected.Conclusions: Immunosuppressive treatment with csDMARDs, in this case a combination of prednisolone, methotrexate and sulfasalazine, substantially downregulates the IFN response in RA patients. The dynamics of this downregulation were partly dependent on the presence of TFBS within the IRGs and the combination and dosages of agents, but they were irrespective of the clinical response to therapy.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fimmu.2019.00902/fullrheumatoid arthritisinterferoninterferon responsebiomarkerimmunosuppression
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tamarah D. de Jong
Tanja Snoek
Elise Mantel
Conny J. van der Laken
Ronald F. van Vollenhoven
Willem F. Lems
spellingShingle Tamarah D. de Jong
Tanja Snoek
Elise Mantel
Conny J. van der Laken
Ronald F. van Vollenhoven
Willem F. Lems
Dynamics of the Type I Interferon Response During Immunosuppressive Therapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis
Frontiers in Immunology
rheumatoid arthritis
interferon
interferon response
biomarker
immunosuppression
author_facet Tamarah D. de Jong
Tanja Snoek
Elise Mantel
Conny J. van der Laken
Ronald F. van Vollenhoven
Willem F. Lems
author_sort Tamarah D. de Jong
title Dynamics of the Type I Interferon Response During Immunosuppressive Therapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis
title_short Dynamics of the Type I Interferon Response During Immunosuppressive Therapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis
title_full Dynamics of the Type I Interferon Response During Immunosuppressive Therapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis
title_fullStr Dynamics of the Type I Interferon Response During Immunosuppressive Therapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis
title_full_unstemmed Dynamics of the Type I Interferon Response During Immunosuppressive Therapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis
title_sort dynamics of the type i interferon response during immunosuppressive therapy in rheumatoid arthritis
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Immunology
issn 1664-3224
publishDate 2019-04-01
description Objective: The type I interferon (IFN) response in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has been extensively studied in relation to therapy with biological DMARDs (bDMARDs). However, the effect of conventional synthetic (cs)DMARDs and glucocorticoids (GCs) on IFN response gene (IRG) expression remains largely unknown, even though csDMARDS are used throughout all disease phases, including simultaneously with biologic therapy. This study was aimed to determine the dynamics of IFN response upon immunosuppressive treatment.Methods: Whole blood was collected in PAXgene tubes from 35 RA patients who received either COBRA therapy (combination of prednisone, initially 60 mg, methotrexate and sulfasalazine) (n = 14) or COBRA-light therapy (prednisone, initially 30 mg, and methotrexate) (n = 21). Expression of 10 IRGs was determined by real-time PCR at baseline (T0), after 4 weeks (T4), and 13 weeks (T13) of treatment. IRG selection was based on the differential presence of transcription factor binding sites (TFBS), in order to study the therapy effect on different pathway components involved in IFN signaling.Results: Seven of the 10 IRGs displayed significant changes during treatment (p ≤ 0.016). These 7 IRGs all displayed a particularly pronounced decrease between T0 and T4 (≥1.6-fold, p ≤ 0.0059). The differences between IRG sensitivity to the treatment appeared related to the presence of TFBS for STAT1 and IRF proteins within the genes. The extent of the decreases between T0 and T4 was similar for the COBRA- and COBRA-light-treated group, despite the differences in drug combination and doses in those groups. Between T4 and T13, however, IRG expression in the COBRA-light-treated group displayed a significant increase, whereas it remained stable or decreased even further in most COBRA-treated patients (comparison of mean fold changes, p = 0.011). A significant association between IRG dynamics and clinical response to therapy was not detected.Conclusions: Immunosuppressive treatment with csDMARDs, in this case a combination of prednisolone, methotrexate and sulfasalazine, substantially downregulates the IFN response in RA patients. The dynamics of this downregulation were partly dependent on the presence of TFBS within the IRGs and the combination and dosages of agents, but they were irrespective of the clinical response to therapy.
topic rheumatoid arthritis
interferon
interferon response
biomarker
immunosuppression
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fimmu.2019.00902/full
work_keys_str_mv AT tamarahddejong dynamicsofthetypeiinterferonresponseduringimmunosuppressivetherapyinrheumatoidarthritis
AT tanjasnoek dynamicsofthetypeiinterferonresponseduringimmunosuppressivetherapyinrheumatoidarthritis
AT elisemantel dynamicsofthetypeiinterferonresponseduringimmunosuppressivetherapyinrheumatoidarthritis
AT connyjvanderlaken dynamicsofthetypeiinterferonresponseduringimmunosuppressivetherapyinrheumatoidarthritis
AT ronaldfvanvollenhoven dynamicsofthetypeiinterferonresponseduringimmunosuppressivetherapyinrheumatoidarthritis
AT willemflems dynamicsofthetypeiinterferonresponseduringimmunosuppressivetherapyinrheumatoidarthritis
_version_ 1716763986327764992