Mixed model with spatial variance–covariance structure for accommodating of local stationary trend and its influence on multi-environmental crop variety trial assessment
The most common procedure for analyzing multi-environmental trials is based on the assumption that the residual error variance is homogenous across all locations considered. However, this may often be unrealistic, and therefore limit the accuracy of variety evaluation or the reliability of variety r...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria
2014-02-01
|
Series: | Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://revistas.inia.es/index.php/sjar/article/view/4926 |
id |
doaj-9cf3924d01804042a8e4edef7c7a2c58 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-9cf3924d01804042a8e4edef7c7a2c582020-11-24T22:27:51ZengInstituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y AlimentariaSpanish Journal of Agricultural Research2171-92922014-02-0112119520510.5424/sjar/2014121-49261987Mixed model with spatial variance–covariance structure for accommodating of local stationary trend and its influence on multi-environmental crop variety trial assessmentAsnake Worku Negash0Henry Mwambi1Temesgen Zewotir2Girma Aweke3School of Mathematics, Statistics and Computer Science. University of KwaZulu-Natal, PietermaritzburgSchool of Mathematics, Statistics and Computer Science. University of KwaZulu-Natal, PietermaritzburgSchool of Mathematics, Statistics and Computer Science. University of KwaZulu-Natal, PietermaritzburgCIMMYT, Addis AbabaThe most common procedure for analyzing multi-environmental trials is based on the assumption that the residual error variance is homogenous across all locations considered. However, this may often be unrealistic, and therefore limit the accuracy of variety evaluation or the reliability of variety recommendations. The objectives of this study were to show the advantages of mixed models with spatial variance–covariance structures, and direct implications of model choice on the inference of varietal performance, ranking and testing based on two multi-environmental data sets from realistic national trials. A model comparison with a chi-square test for the trials in the two data sets (wheat data set BW00RVTI and barley data set BW01RVII) suggested that selected spatial variance-covariance structures fitted the data significantly better than the ANOVA model. The forms of optimally-fitted spatial variance-covariance, ranking and consistency ratio test were not the same from one trial (location) to the other. Linear mixed models with single stage analysis including spatial variance-covariance structure with a group factor of location on the random model also improved the real estimation of genotype effect and their ranking. The model also improved varietal performance estimation because of its capacity to handle additional sources of variation, location and genotype by location (environment) interaction variation and accommodating of local stationary trend.http://revistas.inia.es/index.php/sjar/article/view/4926multi-environmental trialschi-squared testspatial variance–covarianceconsistency ratio testwheatbarley |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Asnake Worku Negash Henry Mwambi Temesgen Zewotir Girma Aweke |
spellingShingle |
Asnake Worku Negash Henry Mwambi Temesgen Zewotir Girma Aweke Mixed model with spatial variance–covariance structure for accommodating of local stationary trend and its influence on multi-environmental crop variety trial assessment Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research multi-environmental trials chi-squared test spatial variance–covariance consistency ratio test wheat barley |
author_facet |
Asnake Worku Negash Henry Mwambi Temesgen Zewotir Girma Aweke |
author_sort |
Asnake Worku Negash |
title |
Mixed model with spatial variance–covariance structure for accommodating of local stationary trend and its influence on multi-environmental crop variety trial assessment |
title_short |
Mixed model with spatial variance–covariance structure for accommodating of local stationary trend and its influence on multi-environmental crop variety trial assessment |
title_full |
Mixed model with spatial variance–covariance structure for accommodating of local stationary trend and its influence on multi-environmental crop variety trial assessment |
title_fullStr |
Mixed model with spatial variance–covariance structure for accommodating of local stationary trend and its influence on multi-environmental crop variety trial assessment |
title_full_unstemmed |
Mixed model with spatial variance–covariance structure for accommodating of local stationary trend and its influence on multi-environmental crop variety trial assessment |
title_sort |
mixed model with spatial variance–covariance structure for accommodating of local stationary trend and its influence on multi-environmental crop variety trial assessment |
publisher |
Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria |
series |
Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research |
issn |
2171-9292 |
publishDate |
2014-02-01 |
description |
The most common procedure for analyzing multi-environmental trials is based on the assumption that the residual error variance is homogenous across all locations considered. However, this may often be unrealistic, and therefore limit the accuracy of variety evaluation or the reliability of variety recommendations. The objectives of this study were to show the advantages of mixed models with spatial variance–covariance structures, and direct implications of model choice on the inference of varietal performance, ranking and testing based on two multi-environmental data sets from realistic national trials. A model comparison with a chi-square test for the trials in the two data sets (wheat data set BW00RVTI and barley data set BW01RVII) suggested that selected spatial variance-covariance structures fitted the data significantly better than the ANOVA model. The forms of optimally-fitted spatial variance-covariance, ranking and consistency ratio test were not the same from one trial (location) to the other. Linear mixed models with single stage analysis including spatial variance-covariance structure with a group factor of location on the random model also improved the real estimation of genotype effect and their ranking. The model also improved varietal performance estimation because of its capacity to handle additional sources of variation, location and genotype by location (environment) interaction variation and accommodating of local stationary trend. |
topic |
multi-environmental trials chi-squared test spatial variance–covariance consistency ratio test wheat barley |
url |
http://revistas.inia.es/index.php/sjar/article/view/4926 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT asnakeworkunegash mixedmodelwithspatialvariancecovariancestructureforaccommodatingoflocalstationarytrendanditsinfluenceonmultienvironmentalcropvarietytrialassessment AT henrymwambi mixedmodelwithspatialvariancecovariancestructureforaccommodatingoflocalstationarytrendanditsinfluenceonmultienvironmentalcropvarietytrialassessment AT temesgenzewotir mixedmodelwithspatialvariancecovariancestructureforaccommodatingoflocalstationarytrendanditsinfluenceonmultienvironmentalcropvarietytrialassessment AT girmaaweke mixedmodelwithspatialvariancecovariancestructureforaccommodatingoflocalstationarytrendanditsinfluenceonmultienvironmentalcropvarietytrialassessment |
_version_ |
1725748722201001984 |