Mixed model with spatial variance–covariance structure for accommodating of local stationary trend and its influence on multi-environmental crop variety trial assessment

The most common procedure for analyzing multi-environmental trials is based on the assumption that the residual error variance is homogenous across all locations considered. However, this may often be unrealistic, and therefore limit the accuracy of variety evaluation or the reliability of variety r...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Asnake Worku Negash, Henry Mwambi, Temesgen Zewotir, Girma Aweke
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria 2014-02-01
Series:Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://revistas.inia.es/index.php/sjar/article/view/4926
id doaj-9cf3924d01804042a8e4edef7c7a2c58
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9cf3924d01804042a8e4edef7c7a2c582020-11-24T22:27:51ZengInstituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y AlimentariaSpanish Journal of Agricultural Research2171-92922014-02-0112119520510.5424/sjar/2014121-49261987Mixed model with spatial variance–covariance structure for accommodating of local stationary trend and its influence on multi-environmental crop variety trial assessmentAsnake Worku Negash0Henry Mwambi1Temesgen Zewotir2Girma Aweke3School of Mathematics, Statistics and Computer Science. University of KwaZulu-Natal, PietermaritzburgSchool of Mathematics, Statistics and Computer Science. University of KwaZulu-Natal, PietermaritzburgSchool of Mathematics, Statistics and Computer Science. University of KwaZulu-Natal, PietermaritzburgCIMMYT, Addis AbabaThe most common procedure for analyzing multi-environmental trials is based on the assumption that the residual error variance is homogenous across all locations considered. However, this may often be unrealistic, and therefore limit the accuracy of variety evaluation or the reliability of variety recommendations. The objectives of this study were to show the advantages of mixed models with spatial variance–covariance structures, and direct implications of model choice on the inference of varietal performance, ranking and testing based on two multi-environmental data sets from realistic national trials. A model comparison with a chi-square test for the trials in the two data sets (wheat data set BW00RVTI and barley data set BW01RVII) suggested that selected spatial variance-covariance structures fitted the data significantly better than the ANOVA model. The forms of optimally-fitted spatial variance-covariance, ranking and consistency ratio test were not the same from one trial (location) to the other. Linear mixed models with single stage analysis including spatial variance-covariance structure with a group factor of location on the random model also improved the real estimation of genotype effect and their ranking. The model also improved varietal performance estimation because of its capacity to handle additional sources of variation, location and genotype by location (environment) interaction variation and accommodating of local stationary trend.http://revistas.inia.es/index.php/sjar/article/view/4926multi-environmental trialschi-squared testspatial variance–covarianceconsistency ratio testwheatbarley
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Asnake Worku Negash
Henry Mwambi
Temesgen Zewotir
Girma Aweke
spellingShingle Asnake Worku Negash
Henry Mwambi
Temesgen Zewotir
Girma Aweke
Mixed model with spatial variance–covariance structure for accommodating of local stationary trend and its influence on multi-environmental crop variety trial assessment
Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research
multi-environmental trials
chi-squared test
spatial variance–covariance
consistency ratio test
wheat
barley
author_facet Asnake Worku Negash
Henry Mwambi
Temesgen Zewotir
Girma Aweke
author_sort Asnake Worku Negash
title Mixed model with spatial variance–covariance structure for accommodating of local stationary trend and its influence on multi-environmental crop variety trial assessment
title_short Mixed model with spatial variance–covariance structure for accommodating of local stationary trend and its influence on multi-environmental crop variety trial assessment
title_full Mixed model with spatial variance–covariance structure for accommodating of local stationary trend and its influence on multi-environmental crop variety trial assessment
title_fullStr Mixed model with spatial variance–covariance structure for accommodating of local stationary trend and its influence on multi-environmental crop variety trial assessment
title_full_unstemmed Mixed model with spatial variance–covariance structure for accommodating of local stationary trend and its influence on multi-environmental crop variety trial assessment
title_sort mixed model with spatial variance–covariance structure for accommodating of local stationary trend and its influence on multi-environmental crop variety trial assessment
publisher Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria
series Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research
issn 2171-9292
publishDate 2014-02-01
description The most common procedure for analyzing multi-environmental trials is based on the assumption that the residual error variance is homogenous across all locations considered. However, this may often be unrealistic, and therefore limit the accuracy of variety evaluation or the reliability of variety recommendations. The objectives of this study were to show the advantages of mixed models with spatial variance–covariance structures, and direct implications of model choice on the inference of varietal performance, ranking and testing based on two multi-environmental data sets from realistic national trials. A model comparison with a chi-square test for the trials in the two data sets (wheat data set BW00RVTI and barley data set BW01RVII) suggested that selected spatial variance-covariance structures fitted the data significantly better than the ANOVA model. The forms of optimally-fitted spatial variance-covariance, ranking and consistency ratio test were not the same from one trial (location) to the other. Linear mixed models with single stage analysis including spatial variance-covariance structure with a group factor of location on the random model also improved the real estimation of genotype effect and their ranking. The model also improved varietal performance estimation because of its capacity to handle additional sources of variation, location and genotype by location (environment) interaction variation and accommodating of local stationary trend.
topic multi-environmental trials
chi-squared test
spatial variance–covariance
consistency ratio test
wheat
barley
url http://revistas.inia.es/index.php/sjar/article/view/4926
work_keys_str_mv AT asnakeworkunegash mixedmodelwithspatialvariancecovariancestructureforaccommodatingoflocalstationarytrendanditsinfluenceonmultienvironmentalcropvarietytrialassessment
AT henrymwambi mixedmodelwithspatialvariancecovariancestructureforaccommodatingoflocalstationarytrendanditsinfluenceonmultienvironmentalcropvarietytrialassessment
AT temesgenzewotir mixedmodelwithspatialvariancecovariancestructureforaccommodatingoflocalstationarytrendanditsinfluenceonmultienvironmentalcropvarietytrialassessment
AT girmaaweke mixedmodelwithspatialvariancecovariancestructureforaccommodatingoflocalstationarytrendanditsinfluenceonmultienvironmentalcropvarietytrialassessment
_version_ 1725748722201001984