Ethical failings of CPSO policy and the health care consent act: case review

• Main Authors: Joshua T. Landry, Rakesh Patel, David Neilipovitz, Kwadwo Kyeremanteng, Gianni D’Egidio
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: BMC 2019-03-01
• Series: BMC Medical Ethics
• Subjects: End-of-life; Autonomy; Medical consent; Palliative care; Quality of life; Ethical responsibility
• Online Access: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12910-019-0357-y

Abstract End-of-life disputes in Ontario are currently overwhelmingly assessed through the singular lens of patient autonomy. The current dispute resolution mechanism(s) does not adequately consider evidence-based medical guidelines, standards of care, the patient’s best interests, expert opinion, or distributive justice. We discuss two cases adjudicated by the Consent and Capacity board of Ontario that demonstrate the over emphasis on patient autonomy. Current health care policy and the Health Care Consent Act also place emphasis on patient autonomy without considering other ethically defensible factors. We argue that current policy and legislation require amendment, and unless there are measures undertaken to modify them, both the quality of care provided and the long-term capabilities of the health care system to remain publicly-funded, comprehensive and equitable, are at stake.