Intergenerational attachment orientations: Gender differences and environmental contribution.

After more than four decades of research and almost 100 attachment studies, the mechanisms of intergenerational transmission of attachment still remain unclear. To better understand the mechanisms moderating the associations of attachment orientations from one generation to the next, this empirical...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yaron Zelekha, Erez Yaakobi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2020-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233906
id doaj-9cec6129ee00441fb77cbc41323dffd2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9cec6129ee00441fb77cbc41323dffd22021-03-03T21:53:49ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-01157e023390610.1371/journal.pone.0233906Intergenerational attachment orientations: Gender differences and environmental contribution.Yaron ZelekhaErez YaakobiAfter more than four decades of research and almost 100 attachment studies, the mechanisms of intergenerational transmission of attachment still remain unclear. To better understand the mechanisms moderating the associations of attachment orientations from one generation to the next, this empirical study examined the roles of 1) shared and non-shared environmental factors that characterize critical events in adulthood such as career choice, income and child care; 2) gender differences in attachment between parents (Generation 1, G1) and their adult offspring (Generation 2, G2) and their possible interactions. A sample of 321 families with G2 adults aged 18 and over and two G1 parents up to the age of 81 took part in this study. Both generations completed the Experiences in Close Relationships attachment measure as well as a comprehensive detailed measure of current core characteristics in adulthood (e.g. employment status, income, whether they had children) and demographic variables (gender, age). The findings suggest that the associations between the attachment orientations of G1 and the attachment orientations of G2 were moderated by G2's income, their G1 paternal income and employment status, whether G2 had children (G3) of their own, and their family status after controlling for the age of G2, and the age of both paternal and maternal G1. When the associations for both paternal and maternal G1attachment orientation with both their male and female G2 was analyzed separately, this accounted for 35% of the variance of males' G2 attachment orientation. The discussion focuses on the contribution of these findings to attachment theory and draws clinical conclusions.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233906
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yaron Zelekha
Erez Yaakobi
spellingShingle Yaron Zelekha
Erez Yaakobi
Intergenerational attachment orientations: Gender differences and environmental contribution.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Yaron Zelekha
Erez Yaakobi
author_sort Yaron Zelekha
title Intergenerational attachment orientations: Gender differences and environmental contribution.
title_short Intergenerational attachment orientations: Gender differences and environmental contribution.
title_full Intergenerational attachment orientations: Gender differences and environmental contribution.
title_fullStr Intergenerational attachment orientations: Gender differences and environmental contribution.
title_full_unstemmed Intergenerational attachment orientations: Gender differences and environmental contribution.
title_sort intergenerational attachment orientations: gender differences and environmental contribution.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2020-01-01
description After more than four decades of research and almost 100 attachment studies, the mechanisms of intergenerational transmission of attachment still remain unclear. To better understand the mechanisms moderating the associations of attachment orientations from one generation to the next, this empirical study examined the roles of 1) shared and non-shared environmental factors that characterize critical events in adulthood such as career choice, income and child care; 2) gender differences in attachment between parents (Generation 1, G1) and their adult offspring (Generation 2, G2) and their possible interactions. A sample of 321 families with G2 adults aged 18 and over and two G1 parents up to the age of 81 took part in this study. Both generations completed the Experiences in Close Relationships attachment measure as well as a comprehensive detailed measure of current core characteristics in adulthood (e.g. employment status, income, whether they had children) and demographic variables (gender, age). The findings suggest that the associations between the attachment orientations of G1 and the attachment orientations of G2 were moderated by G2's income, their G1 paternal income and employment status, whether G2 had children (G3) of their own, and their family status after controlling for the age of G2, and the age of both paternal and maternal G1. When the associations for both paternal and maternal G1attachment orientation with both their male and female G2 was analyzed separately, this accounted for 35% of the variance of males' G2 attachment orientation. The discussion focuses on the contribution of these findings to attachment theory and draws clinical conclusions.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233906
work_keys_str_mv AT yaronzelekha intergenerationalattachmentorientationsgenderdifferencesandenvironmentalcontribution
AT erezyaakobi intergenerationalattachmentorientationsgenderdifferencesandenvironmentalcontribution
_version_ 1714814582153805824