Assumptions of Mixed Treatment Comparisons in Health Technology Assessments - Challenges and Possible Steps for Practical Application.
The validity of mixed treatment comparisons (MTCs), also called network meta-analysis, relies on whether it is reasonable to accept the underlying assumptions on similarity, homogeneity, and consistency. The aim of this paper is to propose a practicable approach to addressing the underlying assumpti...
Main Authors: | Stefanie Reken, Sibylle Sturtz, Corinna Kiefer, Yvonne-Beatrice Böhler, Beate Wieseler |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2016-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4979893?pdf=render |
Similar Items
-
A simulation study to compare different estimation approaches for network meta-analysis and corresponding methods to evaluate the consistency assumption
by: Corinna Kiefer, et al.
Published: (2020-02-01) -
A Feminist Contestation of Ableist Assumptions: Implications for Biomedical Ethics, Disability Theory, and Phenomenology
by: Wieseler, Christine Marie
Published: (2016) -
A descriptive and model-based spatial comparison of the standardised mortality ratio and the age-standardised mortality rate
by: Sibylle Sturtz, et al.
Published: (2007-05-01) -
Challenging Assumptions About Adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorders and Technology
by: Pond, Morgan H.
Published: (2017) -
Creativity in education: challenging the assumptions
by: Kelly Coate, et al.
Published: (2012-06-01)