Mechanism of cellular uptake of genotoxic silica nanoparticles

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Mechanisms for cellular uptake of nanoparticles have important implications for nanoparticulate drug delivery and toxicity. We have explored the mechanism of uptake of amorphous silica nanoparticles of 14 nm diameter, which agglomerate in culture medium to hydrod...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mu Qingshan, Hondow Nicole S, Krzemiński Łukasz, Brown Andy P, Jeuken Lars JC, Routledge Michael N
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2012-07-01
Series:Particle and Fibre Toxicology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.particleandfibretoxicology.com/content/9/1/29
id doaj-9cc2c678e50343fd8b66cf743a5039e2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9cc2c678e50343fd8b66cf743a5039e22020-11-25T00:04:00ZengBMCParticle and Fibre Toxicology1743-89772012-07-01912910.1186/1743-8977-9-29Mechanism of cellular uptake of genotoxic silica nanoparticlesMu QingshanHondow Nicole SKrzemiński ŁukaszBrown Andy PJeuken Lars JCRoutledge Michael N<p>Abstract</p> <p>Mechanisms for cellular uptake of nanoparticles have important implications for nanoparticulate drug delivery and toxicity. We have explored the mechanism of uptake of amorphous silica nanoparticles of 14 nm diameter, which agglomerate in culture medium to hydrodynamic diameters around 500 nm. In HT29, HaCat and A549 cells, cytotoxicity was observed at nanoparticle concentrations ≥ 1 μg/ml, but DNA damage was evident at 0.1 μg/ml and above. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) combined with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy confirmed entry of the silica particles into A549 cells exposed to 10 μg/ml of nanoparticles. The particles were observed in the cytoplasm but not within membrane bound vesicles or in the nucleus. TEM of cells exposed to nanoparticles at 4°C for 30 minutes showed particles enter cells when activity is low, suggesting a passive mode of entry. Plasma lipid membrane models identified physical interactions between the membrane and the silica NPs. Quartz crystal microbalance experiments on tethered bilayer lipid membrane systems show that the nanoparticles strongly bind to lipid membranes, forming an adherent monolayer on the membrane. Leakage assays on large unilamellar vesicles (400 nm diameter) indicate that binding of the silica NPs transiently disrupts the vesicles which rapidly self-seal. We suggest that an adhesive interaction between silica nanoparticles and lipid membranes could cause passive cellular uptake of the particles.</p> http://www.particleandfibretoxicology.com/content/9/1/29NanoparticlesSilicaGenotoxicityElectron microscopyModel membraneNon-endocytotic uptake
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mu Qingshan
Hondow Nicole S
Krzemiński Łukasz
Brown Andy P
Jeuken Lars JC
Routledge Michael N
spellingShingle Mu Qingshan
Hondow Nicole S
Krzemiński Łukasz
Brown Andy P
Jeuken Lars JC
Routledge Michael N
Mechanism of cellular uptake of genotoxic silica nanoparticles
Particle and Fibre Toxicology
Nanoparticles
Silica
Genotoxicity
Electron microscopy
Model membrane
Non-endocytotic uptake
author_facet Mu Qingshan
Hondow Nicole S
Krzemiński Łukasz
Brown Andy P
Jeuken Lars JC
Routledge Michael N
author_sort Mu Qingshan
title Mechanism of cellular uptake of genotoxic silica nanoparticles
title_short Mechanism of cellular uptake of genotoxic silica nanoparticles
title_full Mechanism of cellular uptake of genotoxic silica nanoparticles
title_fullStr Mechanism of cellular uptake of genotoxic silica nanoparticles
title_full_unstemmed Mechanism of cellular uptake of genotoxic silica nanoparticles
title_sort mechanism of cellular uptake of genotoxic silica nanoparticles
publisher BMC
series Particle and Fibre Toxicology
issn 1743-8977
publishDate 2012-07-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Mechanisms for cellular uptake of nanoparticles have important implications for nanoparticulate drug delivery and toxicity. We have explored the mechanism of uptake of amorphous silica nanoparticles of 14 nm diameter, which agglomerate in culture medium to hydrodynamic diameters around 500 nm. In HT29, HaCat and A549 cells, cytotoxicity was observed at nanoparticle concentrations ≥ 1 μg/ml, but DNA damage was evident at 0.1 μg/ml and above. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) combined with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy confirmed entry of the silica particles into A549 cells exposed to 10 μg/ml of nanoparticles. The particles were observed in the cytoplasm but not within membrane bound vesicles or in the nucleus. TEM of cells exposed to nanoparticles at 4°C for 30 minutes showed particles enter cells when activity is low, suggesting a passive mode of entry. Plasma lipid membrane models identified physical interactions between the membrane and the silica NPs. Quartz crystal microbalance experiments on tethered bilayer lipid membrane systems show that the nanoparticles strongly bind to lipid membranes, forming an adherent monolayer on the membrane. Leakage assays on large unilamellar vesicles (400 nm diameter) indicate that binding of the silica NPs transiently disrupts the vesicles which rapidly self-seal. We suggest that an adhesive interaction between silica nanoparticles and lipid membranes could cause passive cellular uptake of the particles.</p>
topic Nanoparticles
Silica
Genotoxicity
Electron microscopy
Model membrane
Non-endocytotic uptake
url http://www.particleandfibretoxicology.com/content/9/1/29
work_keys_str_mv AT muqingshan mechanismofcellularuptakeofgenotoxicsilicananoparticles
AT hondownicoles mechanismofcellularuptakeofgenotoxicsilicananoparticles
AT krzeminskiłukasz mechanismofcellularuptakeofgenotoxicsilicananoparticles
AT brownandyp mechanismofcellularuptakeofgenotoxicsilicananoparticles
AT jeukenlarsjc mechanismofcellularuptakeofgenotoxicsilicananoparticles
AT routledgemichaeln mechanismofcellularuptakeofgenotoxicsilicananoparticles
_version_ 1725431497573269504