Expert Views on Therapeutic Climbing—A Multi-Perspective, Qualitative Study

<b> </b><b></b>Therapeutic climbing (TC) is regularly used as an add-on treatment option for a variety of disorders. However, evidence on the assessment of professionals deciding on the treatment options or assessing the appropriateness of treatment options is lacking. Theref...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anika Frühauf, Julia Heußner, Martin Niedermeier, Martin Kopp
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-03-01
Series:International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/7/3535
id doaj-9ca051f9fc294d81b25ca58293245906
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9ca051f9fc294d81b25ca582932459062021-03-29T23:03:25ZengMDPI AGInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health1661-78271660-46012021-03-01183535353510.3390/ijerph18073535Expert Views on Therapeutic Climbing—A Multi-Perspective, Qualitative StudyAnika Frühauf0Julia Heußner1Martin Niedermeier2Martin Kopp3Department of Sport Science, University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, AustriaDepartment of Sport Science, University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, AustriaDepartment of Sport Science, University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, AustriaDepartment of Sport Science, University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria<b> </b><b></b>Therapeutic climbing (TC) is regularly used as an add-on treatment option for a variety of disorders. However, evidence on the assessment of professionals deciding on the treatment options or assessing the appropriateness of treatment options is lacking. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to assess the potential of TC as an exercise intervention from different expert perspectives. The study was designed as a qualitative, problem-centered interview experiment to assess the perspectives of pedagogues, physicians, and psychologists on exercise therapy in general and the potential of TC. The sample consisted of 30 experts (10 pedagogues, 10 physicians, and 10 psychologists) with different levels of experience in TC (ᴓage: 41.7 years, ♀ = 43%). Overall, the potential of TC as an add-on treatment option for various disorders was rated by the respondents as positive and useful. The interviewed experts believed that TC can have a decisive effect on the social, psychological, and physiological domain as a sensibly used add-on therapy. However, considering the reported potential adverse effects and the costs connected with TC, it should not be considered as a panacea. Although research in this area is still much in its infancy, the positive perspective of the professional representatives surveyed could facilitate access to TC for patients and may foster more research in this field.https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/7/3535exercise therapyattitudesexpert viewsmental health
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Anika Frühauf
Julia Heußner
Martin Niedermeier
Martin Kopp
spellingShingle Anika Frühauf
Julia Heußner
Martin Niedermeier
Martin Kopp
Expert Views on Therapeutic Climbing—A Multi-Perspective, Qualitative Study
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
exercise therapy
attitudes
expert views
mental health
author_facet Anika Frühauf
Julia Heußner
Martin Niedermeier
Martin Kopp
author_sort Anika Frühauf
title Expert Views on Therapeutic Climbing—A Multi-Perspective, Qualitative Study
title_short Expert Views on Therapeutic Climbing—A Multi-Perspective, Qualitative Study
title_full Expert Views on Therapeutic Climbing—A Multi-Perspective, Qualitative Study
title_fullStr Expert Views on Therapeutic Climbing—A Multi-Perspective, Qualitative Study
title_full_unstemmed Expert Views on Therapeutic Climbing—A Multi-Perspective, Qualitative Study
title_sort expert views on therapeutic climbing—a multi-perspective, qualitative study
publisher MDPI AG
series International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
issn 1661-7827
1660-4601
publishDate 2021-03-01
description <b> </b><b></b>Therapeutic climbing (TC) is regularly used as an add-on treatment option for a variety of disorders. However, evidence on the assessment of professionals deciding on the treatment options or assessing the appropriateness of treatment options is lacking. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to assess the potential of TC as an exercise intervention from different expert perspectives. The study was designed as a qualitative, problem-centered interview experiment to assess the perspectives of pedagogues, physicians, and psychologists on exercise therapy in general and the potential of TC. The sample consisted of 30 experts (10 pedagogues, 10 physicians, and 10 psychologists) with different levels of experience in TC (ᴓage: 41.7 years, ♀ = 43%). Overall, the potential of TC as an add-on treatment option for various disorders was rated by the respondents as positive and useful. The interviewed experts believed that TC can have a decisive effect on the social, psychological, and physiological domain as a sensibly used add-on therapy. However, considering the reported potential adverse effects and the costs connected with TC, it should not be considered as a panacea. Although research in this area is still much in its infancy, the positive perspective of the professional representatives surveyed could facilitate access to TC for patients and may foster more research in this field.
topic exercise therapy
attitudes
expert views
mental health
url https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/7/3535
work_keys_str_mv AT anikafruhauf expertviewsontherapeuticclimbingamultiperspectivequalitativestudy
AT juliaheußner expertviewsontherapeuticclimbingamultiperspectivequalitativestudy
AT martinniedermeier expertviewsontherapeuticclimbingamultiperspectivequalitativestudy
AT martinkopp expertviewsontherapeuticclimbingamultiperspectivequalitativestudy
_version_ 1724190238646992896