Expert Views on Therapeutic Climbing—A Multi-Perspective, Qualitative Study
<b> </b><b></b>Therapeutic climbing (TC) is regularly used as an add-on treatment option for a variety of disorders. However, evidence on the assessment of professionals deciding on the treatment options or assessing the appropriateness of treatment options is lacking. Theref...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-03-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/7/3535 |
id |
doaj-9ca051f9fc294d81b25ca58293245906 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-9ca051f9fc294d81b25ca582932459062021-03-29T23:03:25ZengMDPI AGInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health1661-78271660-46012021-03-01183535353510.3390/ijerph18073535Expert Views on Therapeutic Climbing—A Multi-Perspective, Qualitative StudyAnika Frühauf0Julia Heußner1Martin Niedermeier2Martin Kopp3Department of Sport Science, University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, AustriaDepartment of Sport Science, University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, AustriaDepartment of Sport Science, University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, AustriaDepartment of Sport Science, University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria<b> </b><b></b>Therapeutic climbing (TC) is regularly used as an add-on treatment option for a variety of disorders. However, evidence on the assessment of professionals deciding on the treatment options or assessing the appropriateness of treatment options is lacking. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to assess the potential of TC as an exercise intervention from different expert perspectives. The study was designed as a qualitative, problem-centered interview experiment to assess the perspectives of pedagogues, physicians, and psychologists on exercise therapy in general and the potential of TC. The sample consisted of 30 experts (10 pedagogues, 10 physicians, and 10 psychologists) with different levels of experience in TC (ᴓage: 41.7 years, ♀ = 43%). Overall, the potential of TC as an add-on treatment option for various disorders was rated by the respondents as positive and useful. The interviewed experts believed that TC can have a decisive effect on the social, psychological, and physiological domain as a sensibly used add-on therapy. However, considering the reported potential adverse effects and the costs connected with TC, it should not be considered as a panacea. Although research in this area is still much in its infancy, the positive perspective of the professional representatives surveyed could facilitate access to TC for patients and may foster more research in this field.https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/7/3535exercise therapyattitudesexpert viewsmental health |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Anika Frühauf Julia Heußner Martin Niedermeier Martin Kopp |
spellingShingle |
Anika Frühauf Julia Heußner Martin Niedermeier Martin Kopp Expert Views on Therapeutic Climbing—A Multi-Perspective, Qualitative Study International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health exercise therapy attitudes expert views mental health |
author_facet |
Anika Frühauf Julia Heußner Martin Niedermeier Martin Kopp |
author_sort |
Anika Frühauf |
title |
Expert Views on Therapeutic Climbing—A Multi-Perspective, Qualitative Study |
title_short |
Expert Views on Therapeutic Climbing—A Multi-Perspective, Qualitative Study |
title_full |
Expert Views on Therapeutic Climbing—A Multi-Perspective, Qualitative Study |
title_fullStr |
Expert Views on Therapeutic Climbing—A Multi-Perspective, Qualitative Study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Expert Views on Therapeutic Climbing—A Multi-Perspective, Qualitative Study |
title_sort |
expert views on therapeutic climbing—a multi-perspective, qualitative study |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health |
issn |
1661-7827 1660-4601 |
publishDate |
2021-03-01 |
description |
<b> </b><b></b>Therapeutic climbing (TC) is regularly used as an add-on treatment option for a variety of disorders. However, evidence on the assessment of professionals deciding on the treatment options or assessing the appropriateness of treatment options is lacking. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to assess the potential of TC as an exercise intervention from different expert perspectives. The study was designed as a qualitative, problem-centered interview experiment to assess the perspectives of pedagogues, physicians, and psychologists on exercise therapy in general and the potential of TC. The sample consisted of 30 experts (10 pedagogues, 10 physicians, and 10 psychologists) with different levels of experience in TC (ᴓage: 41.7 years, ♀ = 43%). Overall, the potential of TC as an add-on treatment option for various disorders was rated by the respondents as positive and useful. The interviewed experts believed that TC can have a decisive effect on the social, psychological, and physiological domain as a sensibly used add-on therapy. However, considering the reported potential adverse effects and the costs connected with TC, it should not be considered as a panacea. Although research in this area is still much in its infancy, the positive perspective of the professional representatives surveyed could facilitate access to TC for patients and may foster more research in this field. |
topic |
exercise therapy attitudes expert views mental health |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/7/3535 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT anikafruhauf expertviewsontherapeuticclimbingamultiperspectivequalitativestudy AT juliaheußner expertviewsontherapeuticclimbingamultiperspectivequalitativestudy AT martinniedermeier expertviewsontherapeuticclimbingamultiperspectivequalitativestudy AT martinkopp expertviewsontherapeuticclimbingamultiperspectivequalitativestudy |
_version_ |
1724190238646992896 |