Approaches to optimize patient and family engagement in hospital planning and improvement: Qualitative interviews

Abstract Background Patient engagement (PE) in health‐care planning and improvement is a growing practice. We lack evidence‐based guidance for PE, particularly in hospital settings. This study explored how to optimize PE in hospitals. Methods This study was based on qualitative interviews with indiv...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Natalie N. Anderson, G. Ross Baker, Lesley Moody, Kerseri Scane, Robin Urquhart, Walter P. Wodchis, Anna R. Gagliardi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-06-01
Series:Health Expectations
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13239
id doaj-9c9dfdb9b3b444e89c06eba8fc1bfd10
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9c9dfdb9b3b444e89c06eba8fc1bfd102021-06-26T18:56:09ZengWileyHealth Expectations1369-65131369-76252021-06-0124396797710.1111/hex.13239Approaches to optimize patient and family engagement in hospital planning and improvement: Qualitative interviewsNatalie N. Anderson0G. Ross Baker1Lesley Moody2Kerseri Scane3Robin Urquhart4Walter P. Wodchis5Anna R. Gagliardi6Toronto General Hospital Research InstituteUniversity Health Network Toronto CanadaInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation University of Toronto Toronto CanadaPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre University Health Network Toronto CanadaPatient Partnerships University Health Network Toronto CanadaDepartment of Community Health and Epidemiology Dalhousie University Halifax Nova Scotia CanadaInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation University of Toronto Toronto CanadaToronto General Hospital Research InstituteUniversity Health Network Toronto CanadaAbstract Background Patient engagement (PE) in health‐care planning and improvement is a growing practice. We lack evidence‐based guidance for PE, particularly in hospital settings. This study explored how to optimize PE in hospitals. Methods This study was based on qualitative interviews with individuals in various roles at hospitals with high PE capacity. We asked how patients were engaged, rationale for approaches chosen and solutions for key challenges. We identified themes using content analysis. Results Participants included 40 patient/family advisors, PE managers, clinicians and executives from 9 hospitals (2 < 100 beds, 4 100 + beds, 3 teaching). Hospitals most frequently employed collaboration (standing committees, project teams), followed by blended approaches (collaboration + consultation), and then consultation (surveys, interviews). Those using collaboration emphasized integrating perspectives into decisions; those using consultation emphasized capturing diverse perspectives. Strategies to support engagement included engaging diverse patients, prioritizing what benefits many, matching patients to projects, training patients and health‐care workers, involving a critical volume of patients, requiring at least one patient for quorum, asking involved patients to review outputs, linking PE with the Board of Directors and championing PE by managers, staff and committee/team chairs. Conclusion This research generated insight on concrete approaches and strategies that hospitals can use to optimize PE for planning and improvement. On‐going research is needed to understand how to recruit diverse patients and best balance blended consultation/collaboration approaches. Patient or public contribution Three patient research partners with hospital PE experience informed study objectives and interview questions.https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13239hospital planninghospitalspatient engagementpatient participationpatient‐centred carequalitative research
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Natalie N. Anderson
G. Ross Baker
Lesley Moody
Kerseri Scane
Robin Urquhart
Walter P. Wodchis
Anna R. Gagliardi
spellingShingle Natalie N. Anderson
G. Ross Baker
Lesley Moody
Kerseri Scane
Robin Urquhart
Walter P. Wodchis
Anna R. Gagliardi
Approaches to optimize patient and family engagement in hospital planning and improvement: Qualitative interviews
Health Expectations
hospital planning
hospitals
patient engagement
patient participation
patient‐centred care
qualitative research
author_facet Natalie N. Anderson
G. Ross Baker
Lesley Moody
Kerseri Scane
Robin Urquhart
Walter P. Wodchis
Anna R. Gagliardi
author_sort Natalie N. Anderson
title Approaches to optimize patient and family engagement in hospital planning and improvement: Qualitative interviews
title_short Approaches to optimize patient and family engagement in hospital planning and improvement: Qualitative interviews
title_full Approaches to optimize patient and family engagement in hospital planning and improvement: Qualitative interviews
title_fullStr Approaches to optimize patient and family engagement in hospital planning and improvement: Qualitative interviews
title_full_unstemmed Approaches to optimize patient and family engagement in hospital planning and improvement: Qualitative interviews
title_sort approaches to optimize patient and family engagement in hospital planning and improvement: qualitative interviews
publisher Wiley
series Health Expectations
issn 1369-6513
1369-7625
publishDate 2021-06-01
description Abstract Background Patient engagement (PE) in health‐care planning and improvement is a growing practice. We lack evidence‐based guidance for PE, particularly in hospital settings. This study explored how to optimize PE in hospitals. Methods This study was based on qualitative interviews with individuals in various roles at hospitals with high PE capacity. We asked how patients were engaged, rationale for approaches chosen and solutions for key challenges. We identified themes using content analysis. Results Participants included 40 patient/family advisors, PE managers, clinicians and executives from 9 hospitals (2 < 100 beds, 4 100 + beds, 3 teaching). Hospitals most frequently employed collaboration (standing committees, project teams), followed by blended approaches (collaboration + consultation), and then consultation (surveys, interviews). Those using collaboration emphasized integrating perspectives into decisions; those using consultation emphasized capturing diverse perspectives. Strategies to support engagement included engaging diverse patients, prioritizing what benefits many, matching patients to projects, training patients and health‐care workers, involving a critical volume of patients, requiring at least one patient for quorum, asking involved patients to review outputs, linking PE with the Board of Directors and championing PE by managers, staff and committee/team chairs. Conclusion This research generated insight on concrete approaches and strategies that hospitals can use to optimize PE for planning and improvement. On‐going research is needed to understand how to recruit diverse patients and best balance blended consultation/collaboration approaches. Patient or public contribution Three patient research partners with hospital PE experience informed study objectives and interview questions.
topic hospital planning
hospitals
patient engagement
patient participation
patient‐centred care
qualitative research
url https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13239
work_keys_str_mv AT natalienanderson approachestooptimizepatientandfamilyengagementinhospitalplanningandimprovementqualitativeinterviews
AT grossbaker approachestooptimizepatientandfamilyengagementinhospitalplanningandimprovementqualitativeinterviews
AT lesleymoody approachestooptimizepatientandfamilyengagementinhospitalplanningandimprovementqualitativeinterviews
AT kerseriscane approachestooptimizepatientandfamilyengagementinhospitalplanningandimprovementqualitativeinterviews
AT robinurquhart approachestooptimizepatientandfamilyengagementinhospitalplanningandimprovementqualitativeinterviews
AT walterpwodchis approachestooptimizepatientandfamilyengagementinhospitalplanningandimprovementqualitativeinterviews
AT annargagliardi approachestooptimizepatientandfamilyengagementinhospitalplanningandimprovementqualitativeinterviews
_version_ 1721358773479538688