Approaches to optimize patient and family engagement in hospital planning and improvement: Qualitative interviews
Abstract Background Patient engagement (PE) in health‐care planning and improvement is a growing practice. We lack evidence‐based guidance for PE, particularly in hospital settings. This study explored how to optimize PE in hospitals. Methods This study was based on qualitative interviews with indiv...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2021-06-01
|
Series: | Health Expectations |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13239 |
id |
doaj-9c9dfdb9b3b444e89c06eba8fc1bfd10 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-9c9dfdb9b3b444e89c06eba8fc1bfd102021-06-26T18:56:09ZengWileyHealth Expectations1369-65131369-76252021-06-0124396797710.1111/hex.13239Approaches to optimize patient and family engagement in hospital planning and improvement: Qualitative interviewsNatalie N. Anderson0G. Ross Baker1Lesley Moody2Kerseri Scane3Robin Urquhart4Walter P. Wodchis5Anna R. Gagliardi6Toronto General Hospital Research InstituteUniversity Health Network Toronto CanadaInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation University of Toronto Toronto CanadaPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre University Health Network Toronto CanadaPatient Partnerships University Health Network Toronto CanadaDepartment of Community Health and Epidemiology Dalhousie University Halifax Nova Scotia CanadaInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation University of Toronto Toronto CanadaToronto General Hospital Research InstituteUniversity Health Network Toronto CanadaAbstract Background Patient engagement (PE) in health‐care planning and improvement is a growing practice. We lack evidence‐based guidance for PE, particularly in hospital settings. This study explored how to optimize PE in hospitals. Methods This study was based on qualitative interviews with individuals in various roles at hospitals with high PE capacity. We asked how patients were engaged, rationale for approaches chosen and solutions for key challenges. We identified themes using content analysis. Results Participants included 40 patient/family advisors, PE managers, clinicians and executives from 9 hospitals (2 < 100 beds, 4 100 + beds, 3 teaching). Hospitals most frequently employed collaboration (standing committees, project teams), followed by blended approaches (collaboration + consultation), and then consultation (surveys, interviews). Those using collaboration emphasized integrating perspectives into decisions; those using consultation emphasized capturing diverse perspectives. Strategies to support engagement included engaging diverse patients, prioritizing what benefits many, matching patients to projects, training patients and health‐care workers, involving a critical volume of patients, requiring at least one patient for quorum, asking involved patients to review outputs, linking PE with the Board of Directors and championing PE by managers, staff and committee/team chairs. Conclusion This research generated insight on concrete approaches and strategies that hospitals can use to optimize PE for planning and improvement. On‐going research is needed to understand how to recruit diverse patients and best balance blended consultation/collaboration approaches. Patient or public contribution Three patient research partners with hospital PE experience informed study objectives and interview questions.https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13239hospital planninghospitalspatient engagementpatient participationpatient‐centred carequalitative research |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Natalie N. Anderson G. Ross Baker Lesley Moody Kerseri Scane Robin Urquhart Walter P. Wodchis Anna R. Gagliardi |
spellingShingle |
Natalie N. Anderson G. Ross Baker Lesley Moody Kerseri Scane Robin Urquhart Walter P. Wodchis Anna R. Gagliardi Approaches to optimize patient and family engagement in hospital planning and improvement: Qualitative interviews Health Expectations hospital planning hospitals patient engagement patient participation patient‐centred care qualitative research |
author_facet |
Natalie N. Anderson G. Ross Baker Lesley Moody Kerseri Scane Robin Urquhart Walter P. Wodchis Anna R. Gagliardi |
author_sort |
Natalie N. Anderson |
title |
Approaches to optimize patient and family engagement in hospital planning and improvement: Qualitative interviews |
title_short |
Approaches to optimize patient and family engagement in hospital planning and improvement: Qualitative interviews |
title_full |
Approaches to optimize patient and family engagement in hospital planning and improvement: Qualitative interviews |
title_fullStr |
Approaches to optimize patient and family engagement in hospital planning and improvement: Qualitative interviews |
title_full_unstemmed |
Approaches to optimize patient and family engagement in hospital planning and improvement: Qualitative interviews |
title_sort |
approaches to optimize patient and family engagement in hospital planning and improvement: qualitative interviews |
publisher |
Wiley |
series |
Health Expectations |
issn |
1369-6513 1369-7625 |
publishDate |
2021-06-01 |
description |
Abstract Background Patient engagement (PE) in health‐care planning and improvement is a growing practice. We lack evidence‐based guidance for PE, particularly in hospital settings. This study explored how to optimize PE in hospitals. Methods This study was based on qualitative interviews with individuals in various roles at hospitals with high PE capacity. We asked how patients were engaged, rationale for approaches chosen and solutions for key challenges. We identified themes using content analysis. Results Participants included 40 patient/family advisors, PE managers, clinicians and executives from 9 hospitals (2 < 100 beds, 4 100 + beds, 3 teaching). Hospitals most frequently employed collaboration (standing committees, project teams), followed by blended approaches (collaboration + consultation), and then consultation (surveys, interviews). Those using collaboration emphasized integrating perspectives into decisions; those using consultation emphasized capturing diverse perspectives. Strategies to support engagement included engaging diverse patients, prioritizing what benefits many, matching patients to projects, training patients and health‐care workers, involving a critical volume of patients, requiring at least one patient for quorum, asking involved patients to review outputs, linking PE with the Board of Directors and championing PE by managers, staff and committee/team chairs. Conclusion This research generated insight on concrete approaches and strategies that hospitals can use to optimize PE for planning and improvement. On‐going research is needed to understand how to recruit diverse patients and best balance blended consultation/collaboration approaches. Patient or public contribution Three patient research partners with hospital PE experience informed study objectives and interview questions. |
topic |
hospital planning hospitals patient engagement patient participation patient‐centred care qualitative research |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13239 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT natalienanderson approachestooptimizepatientandfamilyengagementinhospitalplanningandimprovementqualitativeinterviews AT grossbaker approachestooptimizepatientandfamilyengagementinhospitalplanningandimprovementqualitativeinterviews AT lesleymoody approachestooptimizepatientandfamilyengagementinhospitalplanningandimprovementqualitativeinterviews AT kerseriscane approachestooptimizepatientandfamilyengagementinhospitalplanningandimprovementqualitativeinterviews AT robinurquhart approachestooptimizepatientandfamilyengagementinhospitalplanningandimprovementqualitativeinterviews AT walterpwodchis approachestooptimizepatientandfamilyengagementinhospitalplanningandimprovementqualitativeinterviews AT annargagliardi approachestooptimizepatientandfamilyengagementinhospitalplanningandimprovementqualitativeinterviews |
_version_ |
1721358773479538688 |