Comparative Analysis of the Methanogen Diversity in Horse and Pony by Using mcrA Gene and Archaeal 16S rRNA Gene Clone Libraries

Comparative analysis of methanogen compositions in the feces of horse and pony was carried out by constructing the α-subunit of methyl coenzyme-M reductase (mcrA) gene and 16S ribosomal RNA gene (16S rRNA) clone libraries. The mcrA clone library analysis indicated that Methanomicrobiales was predomi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Khin-Ohnmar Lwin, Hiroki Matsui
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2014-01-01
Series:Archaea
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/483574
id doaj-9c808c5f877a4d86b6c827cb77eed9a3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9c808c5f877a4d86b6c827cb77eed9a32021-07-02T02:07:52ZengHindawi LimitedArchaea1472-36461472-36542014-01-01201410.1155/2014/483574483574Comparative Analysis of the Methanogen Diversity in Horse and Pony by Using mcrA Gene and Archaeal 16S rRNA Gene Clone LibrariesKhin-Ohnmar Lwin0Hiroki Matsui1Graduate School of Bioresources, Mie University, 1577 Kurimamachiya-Cho, Tsu, Mie 514-8507, JapanGraduate School of Bioresources, Mie University, 1577 Kurimamachiya-Cho, Tsu, Mie 514-8507, JapanComparative analysis of methanogen compositions in the feces of horse and pony was carried out by constructing the α-subunit of methyl coenzyme-M reductase (mcrA) gene and 16S ribosomal RNA gene (16S rRNA) clone libraries. The mcrA clone library analysis indicated that Methanomicrobiales was predominant in both horse and pony. Furthermore, most of the clones of the 16S rRNA gene library showed that Methanomicrobiales was also predominant in horse and pony, but the LIBSHUFF analysis showed that the horse and pony libraries were significantly different (P<0.05). Most of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) showed low similarity to the identified methanogens in both the mcrA and the 16S rRNA clone libraries. The results suggest that horse and pony harbor unidentified and novel methanogens in their hindgut. The methanogen population was higher in horse than in pony; however, the anaerobic fungal population was similar in horse and pony. The methanogen diversity was different between two breeds of Equus caballus.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/483574
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Khin-Ohnmar Lwin
Hiroki Matsui
spellingShingle Khin-Ohnmar Lwin
Hiroki Matsui
Comparative Analysis of the Methanogen Diversity in Horse and Pony by Using mcrA Gene and Archaeal 16S rRNA Gene Clone Libraries
Archaea
author_facet Khin-Ohnmar Lwin
Hiroki Matsui
author_sort Khin-Ohnmar Lwin
title Comparative Analysis of the Methanogen Diversity in Horse and Pony by Using mcrA Gene and Archaeal 16S rRNA Gene Clone Libraries
title_short Comparative Analysis of the Methanogen Diversity in Horse and Pony by Using mcrA Gene and Archaeal 16S rRNA Gene Clone Libraries
title_full Comparative Analysis of the Methanogen Diversity in Horse and Pony by Using mcrA Gene and Archaeal 16S rRNA Gene Clone Libraries
title_fullStr Comparative Analysis of the Methanogen Diversity in Horse and Pony by Using mcrA Gene and Archaeal 16S rRNA Gene Clone Libraries
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Analysis of the Methanogen Diversity in Horse and Pony by Using mcrA Gene and Archaeal 16S rRNA Gene Clone Libraries
title_sort comparative analysis of the methanogen diversity in horse and pony by using mcra gene and archaeal 16s rrna gene clone libraries
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Archaea
issn 1472-3646
1472-3654
publishDate 2014-01-01
description Comparative analysis of methanogen compositions in the feces of horse and pony was carried out by constructing the α-subunit of methyl coenzyme-M reductase (mcrA) gene and 16S ribosomal RNA gene (16S rRNA) clone libraries. The mcrA clone library analysis indicated that Methanomicrobiales was predominant in both horse and pony. Furthermore, most of the clones of the 16S rRNA gene library showed that Methanomicrobiales was also predominant in horse and pony, but the LIBSHUFF analysis showed that the horse and pony libraries were significantly different (P<0.05). Most of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) showed low similarity to the identified methanogens in both the mcrA and the 16S rRNA clone libraries. The results suggest that horse and pony harbor unidentified and novel methanogens in their hindgut. The methanogen population was higher in horse than in pony; however, the anaerobic fungal population was similar in horse and pony. The methanogen diversity was different between two breeds of Equus caballus.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/483574
work_keys_str_mv AT khinohnmarlwin comparativeanalysisofthemethanogendiversityinhorseandponybyusingmcrageneandarchaeal16srrnageneclonelibraries
AT hirokimatsui comparativeanalysisofthemethanogendiversityinhorseandponybyusingmcrageneandarchaeal16srrnageneclonelibraries
_version_ 1721343852246204416