Misreporting to Looping Questions in Surveys: Recall, Motivation and Burden

Looping questions are used to collect data about several similar events, such as employment spells, retirement accounts, or marriages. The loops gather information about the number of events experienced as well as details about each one. The questions require respondents to think hard to recall each...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stephanie Eckman, Frauke Kreuter
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: European Survey Research Association 2018-04-01
Series:Survey Research Methods
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ojs.ub.uni-konstanz.de/srm/article/view/7168
id doaj-9c7b85bdeca5477ead42d8cc8dbe3d0c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9c7b85bdeca5477ead42d8cc8dbe3d0c2020-11-24T22:12:40ZengEuropean Survey Research AssociationSurvey Research Methods1864-33612018-04-0112110.18148/srm/2018.v12i1.7168Misreporting to Looping Questions in Surveys: Recall, Motivation and BurdenStephanie Eckman0Frauke Kreuter1RTI InternationalJPSMLooping questions are used to collect data about several similar events, such as employment spells, retirement accounts, or marriages. The loops gather information about the number of events experienced as well as details about each one. The questions require respondents to think hard to recall each event and are often lengthy and repetitive. Looping questions can be asked in two formats, and which format a survey uses may aect the quality of the data collected. We develop hypotheses about the eects of format on measurement error in looping questions and test the hypotheses using experimental data from a web survey with a link to administrative records. Results show that one format collects more accurate event reports, but the other format provides higher quality data to the follow up questions. We conclude with guidance for those who write survey questions as well as those who rely on survey data for substantive analyses.https://ojs.ub.uni-konstanz.de/srm/article/view/7168survey methodologyburdenmeasurement errorincentives
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Stephanie Eckman
Frauke Kreuter
spellingShingle Stephanie Eckman
Frauke Kreuter
Misreporting to Looping Questions in Surveys: Recall, Motivation and Burden
Survey Research Methods
survey methodology
burden
measurement error
incentives
author_facet Stephanie Eckman
Frauke Kreuter
author_sort Stephanie Eckman
title Misreporting to Looping Questions in Surveys: Recall, Motivation and Burden
title_short Misreporting to Looping Questions in Surveys: Recall, Motivation and Burden
title_full Misreporting to Looping Questions in Surveys: Recall, Motivation and Burden
title_fullStr Misreporting to Looping Questions in Surveys: Recall, Motivation and Burden
title_full_unstemmed Misreporting to Looping Questions in Surveys: Recall, Motivation and Burden
title_sort misreporting to looping questions in surveys: recall, motivation and burden
publisher European Survey Research Association
series Survey Research Methods
issn 1864-3361
publishDate 2018-04-01
description Looping questions are used to collect data about several similar events, such as employment spells, retirement accounts, or marriages. The loops gather information about the number of events experienced as well as details about each one. The questions require respondents to think hard to recall each event and are often lengthy and repetitive. Looping questions can be asked in two formats, and which format a survey uses may aect the quality of the data collected. We develop hypotheses about the eects of format on measurement error in looping questions and test the hypotheses using experimental data from a web survey with a link to administrative records. Results show that one format collects more accurate event reports, but the other format provides higher quality data to the follow up questions. We conclude with guidance for those who write survey questions as well as those who rely on survey data for substantive analyses.
topic survey methodology
burden
measurement error
incentives
url https://ojs.ub.uni-konstanz.de/srm/article/view/7168
work_keys_str_mv AT stephanieeckman misreportingtoloopingquestionsinsurveysrecallmotivationandburden
AT fraukekreuter misreportingtoloopingquestionsinsurveysrecallmotivationandburden
_version_ 1725802849204436992