Misreporting to Looping Questions in Surveys: Recall, Motivation and Burden
Looping questions are used to collect data about several similar events, such as employment spells, retirement accounts, or marriages. The loops gather information about the number of events experienced as well as details about each one. The questions require respondents to think hard to recall each...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
European Survey Research Association
2018-04-01
|
Series: | Survey Research Methods |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ojs.ub.uni-konstanz.de/srm/article/view/7168 |
id |
doaj-9c7b85bdeca5477ead42d8cc8dbe3d0c |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-9c7b85bdeca5477ead42d8cc8dbe3d0c2020-11-24T22:12:40ZengEuropean Survey Research AssociationSurvey Research Methods1864-33612018-04-0112110.18148/srm/2018.v12i1.7168Misreporting to Looping Questions in Surveys: Recall, Motivation and BurdenStephanie Eckman0Frauke Kreuter1RTI InternationalJPSMLooping questions are used to collect data about several similar events, such as employment spells, retirement accounts, or marriages. The loops gather information about the number of events experienced as well as details about each one. The questions require respondents to think hard to recall each event and are often lengthy and repetitive. Looping questions can be asked in two formats, and which format a survey uses may aect the quality of the data collected. We develop hypotheses about the eects of format on measurement error in looping questions and test the hypotheses using experimental data from a web survey with a link to administrative records. Results show that one format collects more accurate event reports, but the other format provides higher quality data to the follow up questions. We conclude with guidance for those who write survey questions as well as those who rely on survey data for substantive analyses.https://ojs.ub.uni-konstanz.de/srm/article/view/7168survey methodologyburdenmeasurement errorincentives |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Stephanie Eckman Frauke Kreuter |
spellingShingle |
Stephanie Eckman Frauke Kreuter Misreporting to Looping Questions in Surveys: Recall, Motivation and Burden Survey Research Methods survey methodology burden measurement error incentives |
author_facet |
Stephanie Eckman Frauke Kreuter |
author_sort |
Stephanie Eckman |
title |
Misreporting to Looping Questions in Surveys: Recall, Motivation and Burden |
title_short |
Misreporting to Looping Questions in Surveys: Recall, Motivation and Burden |
title_full |
Misreporting to Looping Questions in Surveys: Recall, Motivation and Burden |
title_fullStr |
Misreporting to Looping Questions in Surveys: Recall, Motivation and Burden |
title_full_unstemmed |
Misreporting to Looping Questions in Surveys: Recall, Motivation and Burden |
title_sort |
misreporting to looping questions in surveys: recall, motivation and burden |
publisher |
European Survey Research Association |
series |
Survey Research Methods |
issn |
1864-3361 |
publishDate |
2018-04-01 |
description |
Looping questions are used to collect data about several similar events, such as employment spells, retirement accounts, or marriages. The loops gather information about the number of events experienced as well as details about each one. The questions require respondents to think hard to recall each event and are often lengthy and repetitive. Looping questions can be asked in two formats, and which format a survey uses may aect the quality of the data collected. We develop hypotheses about the eects of format on measurement error in looping questions and test the hypotheses using experimental data from a web survey with a link to administrative records. Results show that one format collects more accurate event reports, but the other format provides higher quality data to the follow up questions. We conclude with guidance for those who write survey questions as well as those who rely on survey data for substantive analyses. |
topic |
survey methodology burden measurement error incentives |
url |
https://ojs.ub.uni-konstanz.de/srm/article/view/7168 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT stephanieeckman misreportingtoloopingquestionsinsurveysrecallmotivationandburden AT fraukekreuter misreportingtoloopingquestionsinsurveysrecallmotivationandburden |
_version_ |
1725802849204436992 |