Do conditional cash transfers reduce household vulnerability? Evidence from PROGRESA-Oportunidades in the 2000s

A number of researchers and policymakers have revealed the short- and medium-term impacts of conditional cash transfer (CCT) programs; however, accumulation of full-scale evaluations of their long-term impact is ongoing. To contribute to filling the gap, this study empirically examines the vulnerabi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Naoko Uchiyama
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2019-05-01
Series:EconomiA
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1517758018301309
id doaj-9c6dfa5bf5bd4c93ae3363fb12a2913f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9c6dfa5bf5bd4c93ae3363fb12a2913f2021-08-02T15:59:41ZengElsevierEconomiA1517-75802019-05-012027391Do conditional cash transfers reduce household vulnerability? Evidence from PROGRESA-Oportunidades in the 2000sNaoko Uchiyama0World Language and Society Education Centre, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies (TUFS), 3-11-1 Asahicho, Fuchu, Tokyo 183-8534, JapanA number of researchers and policymakers have revealed the short- and medium-term impacts of conditional cash transfer (CCT) programs; however, accumulation of full-scale evaluations of their long-term impact is ongoing. To contribute to filling the gap, this study empirically examines the vulnerability of rural households in Mexico and how CCT has recently impacted them. Using two Mexican rural household panel datasets from the 2000s, I adopt Kurosaki’s (2006) version of Townsend’s (1994) risk-sharing model with instrumental variable methods, which enables a greater focus on household welfare decline. The empirical results confirm that CCT played a certain role in reducing household vulnerability in the 2000s; however considering the situation after the global crisis in 2008 and the exact mechanism through which this occurs remains subject to further examination. JEL classifications: O12, D12, O54, Keywords: Consumption smoothing, Household vulnerability, PROGRESA-Oportunidadeshttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1517758018301309
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Naoko Uchiyama
spellingShingle Naoko Uchiyama
Do conditional cash transfers reduce household vulnerability? Evidence from PROGRESA-Oportunidades in the 2000s
EconomiA
author_facet Naoko Uchiyama
author_sort Naoko Uchiyama
title Do conditional cash transfers reduce household vulnerability? Evidence from PROGRESA-Oportunidades in the 2000s
title_short Do conditional cash transfers reduce household vulnerability? Evidence from PROGRESA-Oportunidades in the 2000s
title_full Do conditional cash transfers reduce household vulnerability? Evidence from PROGRESA-Oportunidades in the 2000s
title_fullStr Do conditional cash transfers reduce household vulnerability? Evidence from PROGRESA-Oportunidades in the 2000s
title_full_unstemmed Do conditional cash transfers reduce household vulnerability? Evidence from PROGRESA-Oportunidades in the 2000s
title_sort do conditional cash transfers reduce household vulnerability? evidence from progresa-oportunidades in the 2000s
publisher Elsevier
series EconomiA
issn 1517-7580
publishDate 2019-05-01
description A number of researchers and policymakers have revealed the short- and medium-term impacts of conditional cash transfer (CCT) programs; however, accumulation of full-scale evaluations of their long-term impact is ongoing. To contribute to filling the gap, this study empirically examines the vulnerability of rural households in Mexico and how CCT has recently impacted them. Using two Mexican rural household panel datasets from the 2000s, I adopt Kurosaki’s (2006) version of Townsend’s (1994) risk-sharing model with instrumental variable methods, which enables a greater focus on household welfare decline. The empirical results confirm that CCT played a certain role in reducing household vulnerability in the 2000s; however considering the situation after the global crisis in 2008 and the exact mechanism through which this occurs remains subject to further examination. JEL classifications: O12, D12, O54, Keywords: Consumption smoothing, Household vulnerability, PROGRESA-Oportunidades
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1517758018301309
work_keys_str_mv AT naokouchiyama doconditionalcashtransfersreducehouseholdvulnerabilityevidencefromprogresaoportunidadesinthe2000s
_version_ 1721230236302966784