P2.14 COMPARISON OF AGE-RELATED CENTRAL AORTIC BLOOD PRESSURE PARAMETERS USING TWO SPHYGMOCOR TECHNIQUES

Background. Central aortic blood pressure (CBP) parameters are increasingly proved to be stronger predictors of cardiovascular outcomes than peripheral blood pressure parameters. Aortic stiffness, which increases with age, alters these parameters. The aim of this study was to compare the CBP paramet...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Z. Sabahi, M. Butlin, C. Yeung, A.P. Avolio, E. Barin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Atlantis Press 2013-11-01
Series:Artery Research
Online Access:https://www.atlantis-press.com/article/125938973/view
id doaj-9c6cf77844d9486da00fd8ddf50b7b2b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9c6cf77844d9486da00fd8ddf50b7b2b2020-11-25T02:21:24ZengAtlantis PressArtery Research 1876-44012013-11-0171010.1016/j.artres.2013.10.076P2.14 COMPARISON OF AGE-RELATED CENTRAL AORTIC BLOOD PRESSURE PARAMETERS USING TWO SPHYGMOCOR TECHNIQUESZ. SabahiM. ButlinC. YeungA.P. AvolioE. BarinBackground. Central aortic blood pressure (CBP) parameters are increasingly proved to be stronger predictors of cardiovascular outcomes than peripheral blood pressure parameters. Aortic stiffness, which increases with age, alters these parameters. The aim of this study was to compare the CBP parameters measured by two SphygmoCor techniques: tonometric (Classic) and cuff-based (XCEL) with respect to age. Methods: 186 individuals (mean age 68±45 years, range 21–93 years, 97 males) from general cardiac clinic patients were recruited. Tonometric and cuff-based assessment of central systolic blood pressure (cSBP), central diastolic blood pressure (cDBP), central pulse pressure (cPP) and augmentation index normalised to a heart rate of 75 beats/min (AIx75) was made in a randomized fashion after a period of seated acclimatization. Statistical analysis was performed by means of Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) with respect to device and age, with an interaction term between device and age to detect age dependent differences between devices. Results. All parameters changed significantly with age (p<0.001). There was no significant difference between all parameters estimated by the two techniques (Table). The interaction term of device and age was not significant for any parameter, indicating that the devices did not differ with respect to age. Conclusion. The new cuff-based SphygmoCor technique used for evaluation of CBP parameters in a clinical environment is a convenient and accurate proxy for the previous tonometric technique regardless of patient age. p Parameter Device Slope Intercept Device Age Age*device cSBP/age Classic 0.28±0.07 97±5 0.49 <0.001 0.58 (mmHg/yr) XCEL 0.23±0.06 101±4 cDBP/age Classic −0.16±0.04 82±3 0.66 <0.001 0.99 (mmHg/yr) XCEL −0.16±0.04 84±3 cPP/age Classic 0.45±0.06 14±4 0.55 <0.001 0.42 (mmHg/yr) XCEL 0.39±0.05 17±3 AIx75/age Classic 0.22±0.04 6±3 0.13 <0.001 0.38 (%/yr) XCEL 0.16±0.06 14±4 P2.15 Withdrawn by authorhttps://www.atlantis-press.com/article/125938973/view
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Z. Sabahi
M. Butlin
C. Yeung
A.P. Avolio
E. Barin
spellingShingle Z. Sabahi
M. Butlin
C. Yeung
A.P. Avolio
E. Barin
P2.14 COMPARISON OF AGE-RELATED CENTRAL AORTIC BLOOD PRESSURE PARAMETERS USING TWO SPHYGMOCOR TECHNIQUES
Artery Research
author_facet Z. Sabahi
M. Butlin
C. Yeung
A.P. Avolio
E. Barin
author_sort Z. Sabahi
title P2.14 COMPARISON OF AGE-RELATED CENTRAL AORTIC BLOOD PRESSURE PARAMETERS USING TWO SPHYGMOCOR TECHNIQUES
title_short P2.14 COMPARISON OF AGE-RELATED CENTRAL AORTIC BLOOD PRESSURE PARAMETERS USING TWO SPHYGMOCOR TECHNIQUES
title_full P2.14 COMPARISON OF AGE-RELATED CENTRAL AORTIC BLOOD PRESSURE PARAMETERS USING TWO SPHYGMOCOR TECHNIQUES
title_fullStr P2.14 COMPARISON OF AGE-RELATED CENTRAL AORTIC BLOOD PRESSURE PARAMETERS USING TWO SPHYGMOCOR TECHNIQUES
title_full_unstemmed P2.14 COMPARISON OF AGE-RELATED CENTRAL AORTIC BLOOD PRESSURE PARAMETERS USING TWO SPHYGMOCOR TECHNIQUES
title_sort p2.14 comparison of age-related central aortic blood pressure parameters using two sphygmocor techniques
publisher Atlantis Press
series Artery Research
issn 1876-4401
publishDate 2013-11-01
description Background. Central aortic blood pressure (CBP) parameters are increasingly proved to be stronger predictors of cardiovascular outcomes than peripheral blood pressure parameters. Aortic stiffness, which increases with age, alters these parameters. The aim of this study was to compare the CBP parameters measured by two SphygmoCor techniques: tonometric (Classic) and cuff-based (XCEL) with respect to age. Methods: 186 individuals (mean age 68±45 years, range 21–93 years, 97 males) from general cardiac clinic patients were recruited. Tonometric and cuff-based assessment of central systolic blood pressure (cSBP), central diastolic blood pressure (cDBP), central pulse pressure (cPP) and augmentation index normalised to a heart rate of 75 beats/min (AIx75) was made in a randomized fashion after a period of seated acclimatization. Statistical analysis was performed by means of Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) with respect to device and age, with an interaction term between device and age to detect age dependent differences between devices. Results. All parameters changed significantly with age (p<0.001). There was no significant difference between all parameters estimated by the two techniques (Table). The interaction term of device and age was not significant for any parameter, indicating that the devices did not differ with respect to age. Conclusion. The new cuff-based SphygmoCor technique used for evaluation of CBP parameters in a clinical environment is a convenient and accurate proxy for the previous tonometric technique regardless of patient age. p Parameter Device Slope Intercept Device Age Age*device cSBP/age Classic 0.28±0.07 97±5 0.49 <0.001 0.58 (mmHg/yr) XCEL 0.23±0.06 101±4 cDBP/age Classic −0.16±0.04 82±3 0.66 <0.001 0.99 (mmHg/yr) XCEL −0.16±0.04 84±3 cPP/age Classic 0.45±0.06 14±4 0.55 <0.001 0.42 (mmHg/yr) XCEL 0.39±0.05 17±3 AIx75/age Classic 0.22±0.04 6±3 0.13 <0.001 0.38 (%/yr) XCEL 0.16±0.06 14±4 P2.15 Withdrawn by author
url https://www.atlantis-press.com/article/125938973/view
work_keys_str_mv AT zsabahi p214comparisonofagerelatedcentralaorticbloodpressureparametersusingtwosphygmocortechniques
AT mbutlin p214comparisonofagerelatedcentralaorticbloodpressureparametersusingtwosphygmocortechniques
AT cyeung p214comparisonofagerelatedcentralaorticbloodpressureparametersusingtwosphygmocortechniques
AT apavolio p214comparisonofagerelatedcentralaorticbloodpressureparametersusingtwosphygmocortechniques
AT ebarin p214comparisonofagerelatedcentralaorticbloodpressureparametersusingtwosphygmocortechniques
_version_ 1724866426956677120