The Implementation of Performance Management in European Central Governments: More a North-South than an East-West Divide

This article presents the first country-comparative evidence on the importance and use of performance management in European central governments, based on an executive survey conducted in 17 countries. The data confirm that performance management has made its way into European central governments an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hammerschmid Gerhard, Löffler Lorenz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2015-12-01
Series:NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/nispa-2015-0008
id doaj-9c6b9158186c43c9b08bc4db2bf2617c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9c6b9158186c43c9b08bc4db2bf2617c2021-09-06T19:21:05ZengSciendoNISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy1337-90381338-43092015-12-0182496810.1515/nispa-2015-0008nispa-2015-0008The Implementation of Performance Management in European Central Governments: More a North-South than an East-West DivideHammerschmid GerhardLöffler LorenzThis article presents the first country-comparative evidence on the importance and use of performance management in European central governments, based on an executive survey conducted in 17 countries. The data confirm that performance management has made its way into European central governments and continues to constitute a major reform trend. At the organizational level of ministries and agencies we find a consistently strong use of strategic planning, performance appraisal and management objectives, along with only a partial institutionalization of a performance-management logic. Scepticism towards measurement and the difficulty of acting upon performance information are persistent challenges. We also find that performance-management implementation is significantly stronger in agencies and larger organizations, and that it varies strongly between different countries. Implementation is substantially higher in Scandinavian countries and Anglo-Saxon countries than in Continental and Southern European countries, with a rather varied pattern for Central and Eastern European countries. The findings thereby confirm the need for a more context-sensitive understanding of performance management, along with the need for more extensive research and evidence to further develop this cross-comparative European perspective.https://doi.org/10.1515/nispa-2015-0008performance managementeuropecomparative public administrationmanagement instrumentperformance-indicator use
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hammerschmid Gerhard
Löffler Lorenz
spellingShingle Hammerschmid Gerhard
Löffler Lorenz
The Implementation of Performance Management in European Central Governments: More a North-South than an East-West Divide
NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy
performance management
europe
comparative public administration
management instrument
performance-indicator use
author_facet Hammerschmid Gerhard
Löffler Lorenz
author_sort Hammerschmid Gerhard
title The Implementation of Performance Management in European Central Governments: More a North-South than an East-West Divide
title_short The Implementation of Performance Management in European Central Governments: More a North-South than an East-West Divide
title_full The Implementation of Performance Management in European Central Governments: More a North-South than an East-West Divide
title_fullStr The Implementation of Performance Management in European Central Governments: More a North-South than an East-West Divide
title_full_unstemmed The Implementation of Performance Management in European Central Governments: More a North-South than an East-West Divide
title_sort implementation of performance management in european central governments: more a north-south than an east-west divide
publisher Sciendo
series NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy
issn 1337-9038
1338-4309
publishDate 2015-12-01
description This article presents the first country-comparative evidence on the importance and use of performance management in European central governments, based on an executive survey conducted in 17 countries. The data confirm that performance management has made its way into European central governments and continues to constitute a major reform trend. At the organizational level of ministries and agencies we find a consistently strong use of strategic planning, performance appraisal and management objectives, along with only a partial institutionalization of a performance-management logic. Scepticism towards measurement and the difficulty of acting upon performance information are persistent challenges. We also find that performance-management implementation is significantly stronger in agencies and larger organizations, and that it varies strongly between different countries. Implementation is substantially higher in Scandinavian countries and Anglo-Saxon countries than in Continental and Southern European countries, with a rather varied pattern for Central and Eastern European countries. The findings thereby confirm the need for a more context-sensitive understanding of performance management, along with the need for more extensive research and evidence to further develop this cross-comparative European perspective.
topic performance management
europe
comparative public administration
management instrument
performance-indicator use
url https://doi.org/10.1515/nispa-2015-0008
work_keys_str_mv AT hammerschmidgerhard theimplementationofperformancemanagementineuropeancentralgovernmentsmoreanorthsouththananeastwestdivide
AT lofflerlorenz theimplementationofperformancemanagementineuropeancentralgovernmentsmoreanorthsouththananeastwestdivide
AT hammerschmidgerhard implementationofperformancemanagementineuropeancentralgovernmentsmoreanorthsouththananeastwestdivide
AT lofflerlorenz implementationofperformancemanagementineuropeancentralgovernmentsmoreanorthsouththananeastwestdivide
_version_ 1717775180381552640