Can We Assume the Gene Expression Profile as a Proxy for Signaling Network Activity?

Studying relationships among gene products by expression profile analysis is a common approach in systems biology. Many studies have generalized the outcomes to the different levels of central dogma information flow and assumed a correlation of transcript and protein expression levels. However, the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mehran Piran, Reza Karbalaei, Mehrdad Piran, Jehad Aldahdooh, Mehdi Mirzaie, Naser Ansari-Pour, Jing Tang, Mohieddin Jafari
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-06-01
Series:Biomolecules
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2218-273X/10/6/850
id doaj-9c592abaeacc49b7b36a1c4393d9dcff
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9c592abaeacc49b7b36a1c4393d9dcff2020-11-25T03:14:15ZengMDPI AGBiomolecules2218-273X2020-06-011085085010.3390/biom10060850Can We Assume the Gene Expression Profile as a Proxy for Signaling Network Activity?Mehran Piran0Reza Karbalaei1Mehrdad Piran2Jehad Aldahdooh3Mehdi Mirzaie4Naser Ansari-Pour5Jing Tang6Mohieddin Jafari7Bioinformatics and Computational Biology Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz P.O. Box 71336-54361, IranDepartment of Biology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USADepartment of Tissue Engineering and Applied Cell Sciences, School of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 14177-55469, IranResearch Program in Systems Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, 00270 Helsinki, FinlandDepartment of Applied Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran P.O. Box 14115-134, IranNuffield Department of Medicine, Big Data Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LF, UKResearch Program in Systems Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, 00270 Helsinki, FinlandResearch Program in Systems Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, 00270 Helsinki, FinlandStudying relationships among gene products by expression profile analysis is a common approach in systems biology. Many studies have generalized the outcomes to the different levels of central dogma information flow and assumed a correlation of transcript and protein expression levels. However, the relation between the various types of interaction (i.e., activation and inhibition) of gene products to their expression profiles has not been widely studied. In fact, looking for any perturbation according to differentially expressed genes is the common approach, while analyzing the effects of altered expression on the activity of signaling pathways is often ignored. In this study, we examine whether significant changes in gene expression necessarily lead to dysregulated signaling pathways. Using four commonly used and comprehensive databases, we extracted all relevant gene expression data and all relationships among directly linked gene pairs. We aimed to evaluate the ratio of coherency or sign consistency between the expression level as well as the causal relationships among the gene pairs. Through a comparison with random unconnected gene pairs, we illustrate that the signaling network is incoherent, and inconsistent with the recorded expression profile. Finally, we demonstrate that, to infer perturbed signaling pathways, we need to consider the type of relationships in addition to gene-product expression data, especially at the transcript level. We assert that identifying enriched biological processes via differentially expressed genes is limited when attempting to infer dysregulated pathways.https://www.mdpi.com/2218-273X/10/6/850gene expressionsignaling networknetwork biologytranscriptomicsdifferentially expressed genescausality analysis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mehran Piran
Reza Karbalaei
Mehrdad Piran
Jehad Aldahdooh
Mehdi Mirzaie
Naser Ansari-Pour
Jing Tang
Mohieddin Jafari
spellingShingle Mehran Piran
Reza Karbalaei
Mehrdad Piran
Jehad Aldahdooh
Mehdi Mirzaie
Naser Ansari-Pour
Jing Tang
Mohieddin Jafari
Can We Assume the Gene Expression Profile as a Proxy for Signaling Network Activity?
Biomolecules
gene expression
signaling network
network biology
transcriptomics
differentially expressed genes
causality analysis
author_facet Mehran Piran
Reza Karbalaei
Mehrdad Piran
Jehad Aldahdooh
Mehdi Mirzaie
Naser Ansari-Pour
Jing Tang
Mohieddin Jafari
author_sort Mehran Piran
title Can We Assume the Gene Expression Profile as a Proxy for Signaling Network Activity?
title_short Can We Assume the Gene Expression Profile as a Proxy for Signaling Network Activity?
title_full Can We Assume the Gene Expression Profile as a Proxy for Signaling Network Activity?
title_fullStr Can We Assume the Gene Expression Profile as a Proxy for Signaling Network Activity?
title_full_unstemmed Can We Assume the Gene Expression Profile as a Proxy for Signaling Network Activity?
title_sort can we assume the gene expression profile as a proxy for signaling network activity?
publisher MDPI AG
series Biomolecules
issn 2218-273X
publishDate 2020-06-01
description Studying relationships among gene products by expression profile analysis is a common approach in systems biology. Many studies have generalized the outcomes to the different levels of central dogma information flow and assumed a correlation of transcript and protein expression levels. However, the relation between the various types of interaction (i.e., activation and inhibition) of gene products to their expression profiles has not been widely studied. In fact, looking for any perturbation according to differentially expressed genes is the common approach, while analyzing the effects of altered expression on the activity of signaling pathways is often ignored. In this study, we examine whether significant changes in gene expression necessarily lead to dysregulated signaling pathways. Using four commonly used and comprehensive databases, we extracted all relevant gene expression data and all relationships among directly linked gene pairs. We aimed to evaluate the ratio of coherency or sign consistency between the expression level as well as the causal relationships among the gene pairs. Through a comparison with random unconnected gene pairs, we illustrate that the signaling network is incoherent, and inconsistent with the recorded expression profile. Finally, we demonstrate that, to infer perturbed signaling pathways, we need to consider the type of relationships in addition to gene-product expression data, especially at the transcript level. We assert that identifying enriched biological processes via differentially expressed genes is limited when attempting to infer dysregulated pathways.
topic gene expression
signaling network
network biology
transcriptomics
differentially expressed genes
causality analysis
url https://www.mdpi.com/2218-273X/10/6/850
work_keys_str_mv AT mehranpiran canweassumethegeneexpressionprofileasaproxyforsignalingnetworkactivity
AT rezakarbalaei canweassumethegeneexpressionprofileasaproxyforsignalingnetworkactivity
AT mehrdadpiran canweassumethegeneexpressionprofileasaproxyforsignalingnetworkactivity
AT jehadaldahdooh canweassumethegeneexpressionprofileasaproxyforsignalingnetworkactivity
AT mehdimirzaie canweassumethegeneexpressionprofileasaproxyforsignalingnetworkactivity
AT naseransaripour canweassumethegeneexpressionprofileasaproxyforsignalingnetworkactivity
AT jingtang canweassumethegeneexpressionprofileasaproxyforsignalingnetworkactivity
AT mohieddinjafari canweassumethegeneexpressionprofileasaproxyforsignalingnetworkactivity
_version_ 1724643653199069184