Effectiveness of the Initiatives of Chernihiv Nobility in Exile in the Light of Sejm Resolutions of the Middle and Second Half of the 17th Century

The article analyzes the political activity of Chernihiv voivodeship nobility in exile during 1648–1667. The purpose of the work is to study the parliamentary activities of the forced migrants in the context of competitions for the establishment of control over Left-Bank Ukraine between the Polish-L...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Myroslava Vorobei
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: RIUS 2020-03-01
Series: Українознавство
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.ndiu.org.ua/article/view/199463
id doaj-9c4d2d7777414fe290277e3c174fa0b6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9c4d2d7777414fe290277e3c174fa0b62020-11-25T03:52:51ZengRIUS Українознавство2413-70652413-71032020-03-0101(74)14816110.30840/2413-7065.1(74).2020.199463199463Effectiveness of the Initiatives of Chernihiv Nobility in Exile in the Light of Sejm Resolutions of the Middle and Second Half of the 17th CenturyMyroslava Vorobei0НДІУThe article analyzes the political activity of Chernihiv voivodeship nobility in exile during 1648–1667. The purpose of the work is to study the parliamentary activities of the forced migrants in the context of competitions for the establishment of control over Left-Bank Ukraine between the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, the Zaporizhian Host, and the Tsardom of Muscovy. The chronological framework of the research is 1648–1667. The lower margin is due to the outset of the Cossack revolution, which initiated the process of transforming Chernihiv voivodeship into an integral part of the Hetmanate. The upper margin is justified by the conclusion of the Truce of Andrusovo, which left the region under the influence of the Moscow tsar for 13.5 years. Despite the fact that the diplomatic capitulation of the Polish-Lithuanian State was the Treaty of Perpetual Peace (1686), it was the Truce of Andrusovo that made refugees from Ukrainian voivodeships finally lose their estates, as indicated by the monetary compensation from the Moscow tsar. The article deals with the content of ambassadorial instructions, in which the szlachta raises the issue of returning its estates and providing compensation for its losses. In order to achieve those goals, voivodeship representatives used the full spectrum of possible parliamentary pressure, in particular, were ready to threaten the consistency of general sejm sessions. This ultimately led to receiving monetary compensations (however, insufficient, according to the petitioners). The sejm success of the Chernihiv nobility was modest. In the light of the difficult military and political situation in the country, the “Chernihiv issue” remained a minor problem in the face of greater threats. Despite this, even small achievements of Chernihiv members of parliament could not deny the fact of a high political activity during their “exile” period.http://journal.ndiu.org.ua/article/view/199463шляхта-вигнанцісеймик на вигнанніcеймикчернігівське воєводстворіч посполита
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Myroslava Vorobei
spellingShingle Myroslava Vorobei
Effectiveness of the Initiatives of Chernihiv Nobility in Exile in the Light of Sejm Resolutions of the Middle and Second Half of the 17th Century
Українознавство
шляхта-вигнанці
сеймик на вигнанні
cеймик
чернігівське воєводство
річ посполита
author_facet Myroslava Vorobei
author_sort Myroslava Vorobei
title Effectiveness of the Initiatives of Chernihiv Nobility in Exile in the Light of Sejm Resolutions of the Middle and Second Half of the 17th Century
title_short Effectiveness of the Initiatives of Chernihiv Nobility in Exile in the Light of Sejm Resolutions of the Middle and Second Half of the 17th Century
title_full Effectiveness of the Initiatives of Chernihiv Nobility in Exile in the Light of Sejm Resolutions of the Middle and Second Half of the 17th Century
title_fullStr Effectiveness of the Initiatives of Chernihiv Nobility in Exile in the Light of Sejm Resolutions of the Middle and Second Half of the 17th Century
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of the Initiatives of Chernihiv Nobility in Exile in the Light of Sejm Resolutions of the Middle and Second Half of the 17th Century
title_sort effectiveness of the initiatives of chernihiv nobility in exile in the light of sejm resolutions of the middle and second half of the 17th century
publisher RIUS
series Українознавство
issn 2413-7065
2413-7103
publishDate 2020-03-01
description The article analyzes the political activity of Chernihiv voivodeship nobility in exile during 1648–1667. The purpose of the work is to study the parliamentary activities of the forced migrants in the context of competitions for the establishment of control over Left-Bank Ukraine between the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, the Zaporizhian Host, and the Tsardom of Muscovy. The chronological framework of the research is 1648–1667. The lower margin is due to the outset of the Cossack revolution, which initiated the process of transforming Chernihiv voivodeship into an integral part of the Hetmanate. The upper margin is justified by the conclusion of the Truce of Andrusovo, which left the region under the influence of the Moscow tsar for 13.5 years. Despite the fact that the diplomatic capitulation of the Polish-Lithuanian State was the Treaty of Perpetual Peace (1686), it was the Truce of Andrusovo that made refugees from Ukrainian voivodeships finally lose their estates, as indicated by the monetary compensation from the Moscow tsar. The article deals with the content of ambassadorial instructions, in which the szlachta raises the issue of returning its estates and providing compensation for its losses. In order to achieve those goals, voivodeship representatives used the full spectrum of possible parliamentary pressure, in particular, were ready to threaten the consistency of general sejm sessions. This ultimately led to receiving monetary compensations (however, insufficient, according to the petitioners). The sejm success of the Chernihiv nobility was modest. In the light of the difficult military and political situation in the country, the “Chernihiv issue” remained a minor problem in the face of greater threats. Despite this, even small achievements of Chernihiv members of parliament could not deny the fact of a high political activity during their “exile” period.
topic шляхта-вигнанці
сеймик на вигнанні
cеймик
чернігівське воєводство
річ посполита
url http://journal.ndiu.org.ua/article/view/199463
work_keys_str_mv AT myroslavavorobei effectivenessoftheinitiativesofchernihivnobilityinexileinthelightofsejmresolutionsofthemiddleandsecondhalfofthe17thcentury
_version_ 1724480576451248128