Child t-shirt size data set from 3D body scanner anthropometric measurements and a questionnaire

A dataset of a fit assessment study in children is presented. Anthropometric measurements of 113 children were obtained using a 3D body scanner. Children tested a t-shirt of different sizes and a different model for boys and girls, and their fit was assessed by an expert. This expert labeled the fit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: A. Pierola, I. Epifanio, S. Alemany
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2017-04-01
Series:Data in Brief
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352340917300446
id doaj-9c342ee2a00946489b7549d9e1b80b11
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9c342ee2a00946489b7549d9e1b80b112020-11-25T02:11:38ZengElsevierData in Brief2352-34092017-04-0111C31131510.1016/j.dib.2017.02.025Child t-shirt size data set from 3D body scanner anthropometric measurements and a questionnaireA. Pierola0I. Epifanio1S. Alemany2Biomechanics Institute of Valencia, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, Valencia 46022, SpainDept. Matemàtiques and Institut de Matemàtiques i Aplicacions de Castelló, Universitat Jaume I, Castelló 12071, SpainBiomechanics Institute of Valencia, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, Valencia 46022, SpainA dataset of a fit assessment study in children is presented. Anthropometric measurements of 113 children were obtained using a 3D body scanner. Children tested a t-shirt of different sizes and a different model for boys and girls, and their fit was assessed by an expert. This expert labeled the fit as 0 (correct), −1 (if the garment was small for that child), or 1 (if the garment was large for that child) in an ordered factor called Size-fit. Moreover, the fit was numerically assessed from 1 (very poor fit) to 10 (perfect fit) in a variable called Expert evaluation. This data set contains the differences between the reference mannequin of the evaluated size and the child׳s anthropometric measurements for 27 variables. Besides these variables, in the data set, we can also find the gender, the size evaluated, and the size recommended by the expert, including if an intermediate, but nonexistent size between two consecutive sizes would have been the right size. In total, there are 232 observations. The analysis of these data can be found in Pierola et al. (2016) [2].http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352340917300446AnthropometryErgonomicsClothing fitClassification
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author A. Pierola
I. Epifanio
S. Alemany
spellingShingle A. Pierola
I. Epifanio
S. Alemany
Child t-shirt size data set from 3D body scanner anthropometric measurements and a questionnaire
Data in Brief
Anthropometry
Ergonomics
Clothing fit
Classification
author_facet A. Pierola
I. Epifanio
S. Alemany
author_sort A. Pierola
title Child t-shirt size data set from 3D body scanner anthropometric measurements and a questionnaire
title_short Child t-shirt size data set from 3D body scanner anthropometric measurements and a questionnaire
title_full Child t-shirt size data set from 3D body scanner anthropometric measurements and a questionnaire
title_fullStr Child t-shirt size data set from 3D body scanner anthropometric measurements and a questionnaire
title_full_unstemmed Child t-shirt size data set from 3D body scanner anthropometric measurements and a questionnaire
title_sort child t-shirt size data set from 3d body scanner anthropometric measurements and a questionnaire
publisher Elsevier
series Data in Brief
issn 2352-3409
publishDate 2017-04-01
description A dataset of a fit assessment study in children is presented. Anthropometric measurements of 113 children were obtained using a 3D body scanner. Children tested a t-shirt of different sizes and a different model for boys and girls, and their fit was assessed by an expert. This expert labeled the fit as 0 (correct), −1 (if the garment was small for that child), or 1 (if the garment was large for that child) in an ordered factor called Size-fit. Moreover, the fit was numerically assessed from 1 (very poor fit) to 10 (perfect fit) in a variable called Expert evaluation. This data set contains the differences between the reference mannequin of the evaluated size and the child׳s anthropometric measurements for 27 variables. Besides these variables, in the data set, we can also find the gender, the size evaluated, and the size recommended by the expert, including if an intermediate, but nonexistent size between two consecutive sizes would have been the right size. In total, there are 232 observations. The analysis of these data can be found in Pierola et al. (2016) [2].
topic Anthropometry
Ergonomics
Clothing fit
Classification
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352340917300446
work_keys_str_mv AT apierola childtshirtsizedatasetfrom3dbodyscanneranthropometricmeasurementsandaquestionnaire
AT iepifanio childtshirtsizedatasetfrom3dbodyscanneranthropometricmeasurementsandaquestionnaire
AT salemany childtshirtsizedatasetfrom3dbodyscanneranthropometricmeasurementsandaquestionnaire
_version_ 1724913641211297792