Child t-shirt size data set from 3D body scanner anthropometric measurements and a questionnaire
A dataset of a fit assessment study in children is presented. Anthropometric measurements of 113 children were obtained using a 3D body scanner. Children tested a t-shirt of different sizes and a different model for boys and girls, and their fit was assessed by an expert. This expert labeled the fit...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2017-04-01
|
Series: | Data in Brief |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352340917300446 |
id |
doaj-9c342ee2a00946489b7549d9e1b80b11 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-9c342ee2a00946489b7549d9e1b80b112020-11-25T02:11:38ZengElsevierData in Brief2352-34092017-04-0111C31131510.1016/j.dib.2017.02.025Child t-shirt size data set from 3D body scanner anthropometric measurements and a questionnaireA. Pierola0I. Epifanio1S. Alemany2Biomechanics Institute of Valencia, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, Valencia 46022, SpainDept. Matemàtiques and Institut de Matemàtiques i Aplicacions de Castelló, Universitat Jaume I, Castelló 12071, SpainBiomechanics Institute of Valencia, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, Valencia 46022, SpainA dataset of a fit assessment study in children is presented. Anthropometric measurements of 113 children were obtained using a 3D body scanner. Children tested a t-shirt of different sizes and a different model for boys and girls, and their fit was assessed by an expert. This expert labeled the fit as 0 (correct), −1 (if the garment was small for that child), or 1 (if the garment was large for that child) in an ordered factor called Size-fit. Moreover, the fit was numerically assessed from 1 (very poor fit) to 10 (perfect fit) in a variable called Expert evaluation. This data set contains the differences between the reference mannequin of the evaluated size and the child׳s anthropometric measurements for 27 variables. Besides these variables, in the data set, we can also find the gender, the size evaluated, and the size recommended by the expert, including if an intermediate, but nonexistent size between two consecutive sizes would have been the right size. In total, there are 232 observations. The analysis of these data can be found in Pierola et al. (2016) [2].http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352340917300446AnthropometryErgonomicsClothing fitClassification |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
A. Pierola I. Epifanio S. Alemany |
spellingShingle |
A. Pierola I. Epifanio S. Alemany Child t-shirt size data set from 3D body scanner anthropometric measurements and a questionnaire Data in Brief Anthropometry Ergonomics Clothing fit Classification |
author_facet |
A. Pierola I. Epifanio S. Alemany |
author_sort |
A. Pierola |
title |
Child t-shirt size data set from 3D body scanner anthropometric measurements and a questionnaire |
title_short |
Child t-shirt size data set from 3D body scanner anthropometric measurements and a questionnaire |
title_full |
Child t-shirt size data set from 3D body scanner anthropometric measurements and a questionnaire |
title_fullStr |
Child t-shirt size data set from 3D body scanner anthropometric measurements and a questionnaire |
title_full_unstemmed |
Child t-shirt size data set from 3D body scanner anthropometric measurements and a questionnaire |
title_sort |
child t-shirt size data set from 3d body scanner anthropometric measurements and a questionnaire |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
Data in Brief |
issn |
2352-3409 |
publishDate |
2017-04-01 |
description |
A dataset of a fit assessment study in children is presented. Anthropometric measurements of 113 children were obtained using a 3D body scanner. Children tested a t-shirt of different sizes and a different model for boys and girls, and their fit was assessed by an expert. This expert labeled the fit as 0 (correct), −1 (if the garment was small for that child), or 1 (if the garment was large for that child) in an ordered factor called Size-fit. Moreover, the fit was numerically assessed from 1 (very poor fit) to 10 (perfect fit) in a variable called Expert evaluation. This data set contains the differences between the reference mannequin of the evaluated size and the child׳s anthropometric measurements for 27 variables. Besides these variables, in the data set, we can also find the gender, the size evaluated, and the size recommended by the expert, including if an intermediate, but nonexistent size between two consecutive sizes would have been the right size. In total, there are 232 observations. The analysis of these data can be found in Pierola et al. (2016) [2]. |
topic |
Anthropometry Ergonomics Clothing fit Classification |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352340917300446 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT apierola childtshirtsizedatasetfrom3dbodyscanneranthropometricmeasurementsandaquestionnaire AT iepifanio childtshirtsizedatasetfrom3dbodyscanneranthropometricmeasurementsandaquestionnaire AT salemany childtshirtsizedatasetfrom3dbodyscanneranthropometricmeasurementsandaquestionnaire |
_version_ |
1724913641211297792 |