Impostor Phenomenon Measurement Scales: A Systematic Review

The impostor phenomenon is a pervasive psychological experience of perceived intellectual and professional fraudulence. It is not a diagnosable condition yet observed in clinical and normal populations. Increasingly, impostorism research has expanded beyond clinical and into applied settings. Howeve...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Karina K. L. Mak, Sabina Kleitman, Maree J. Abbott
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-04-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00671/full
id doaj-9c2aa5838d8c441eaf6d01f2a8dc1cd7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9c2aa5838d8c441eaf6d01f2a8dc1cd72020-11-25T01:34:00ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782019-04-011010.3389/fpsyg.2019.00671441077Impostor Phenomenon Measurement Scales: A Systematic ReviewKarina K. L. MakSabina KleitmanMaree J. AbbottThe impostor phenomenon is a pervasive psychological experience of perceived intellectual and professional fraudulence. It is not a diagnosable condition yet observed in clinical and normal populations. Increasingly, impostorism research has expanded beyond clinical and into applied settings. However, to date, a systematic review examining the methodological quality of impostorism measures used to conduct such research has yet to be carried out. This systematic review examines trait impostor phenomenon measures and evaluates their psychometric properties against a quality assessment framework. Systematic searches were carried out on six electronic databases, seeking original empirical studies examining the conceptualization, development, or validation of self-report impostor phenomenon scales. A subsequent review of reference lists also included two full-text dissertations. Predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria were specified to select the final 18 studies in the review sample. Of the studies included, four measures of the impostor phenomenon were identified and their psychometric properties assessed against the quality appraisal tool—Clance Impostor Phenomenon Scale, Harvey Impostor Scale, Perceived Fraudulence Scale, and Leary Impostor Scale. The findings often highlighted that studies did not necessarily report poor psychometric properties; rather an absence of data and stringent assessment criteria resulted in lower methodological ratings. Recommendations for future research are made to address the conceptual clarification of the construct's dimensionality, to improve future study quality and to enable better discrimination between measures.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00671/fullimpostor phenomenonimpostorismvalidationmeasurepsychometric
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Karina K. L. Mak
Sabina Kleitman
Maree J. Abbott
spellingShingle Karina K. L. Mak
Sabina Kleitman
Maree J. Abbott
Impostor Phenomenon Measurement Scales: A Systematic Review
Frontiers in Psychology
impostor phenomenon
impostorism
validation
measure
psychometric
author_facet Karina K. L. Mak
Sabina Kleitman
Maree J. Abbott
author_sort Karina K. L. Mak
title Impostor Phenomenon Measurement Scales: A Systematic Review
title_short Impostor Phenomenon Measurement Scales: A Systematic Review
title_full Impostor Phenomenon Measurement Scales: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Impostor Phenomenon Measurement Scales: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Impostor Phenomenon Measurement Scales: A Systematic Review
title_sort impostor phenomenon measurement scales: a systematic review
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2019-04-01
description The impostor phenomenon is a pervasive psychological experience of perceived intellectual and professional fraudulence. It is not a diagnosable condition yet observed in clinical and normal populations. Increasingly, impostorism research has expanded beyond clinical and into applied settings. However, to date, a systematic review examining the methodological quality of impostorism measures used to conduct such research has yet to be carried out. This systematic review examines trait impostor phenomenon measures and evaluates their psychometric properties against a quality assessment framework. Systematic searches were carried out on six electronic databases, seeking original empirical studies examining the conceptualization, development, or validation of self-report impostor phenomenon scales. A subsequent review of reference lists also included two full-text dissertations. Predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria were specified to select the final 18 studies in the review sample. Of the studies included, four measures of the impostor phenomenon were identified and their psychometric properties assessed against the quality appraisal tool—Clance Impostor Phenomenon Scale, Harvey Impostor Scale, Perceived Fraudulence Scale, and Leary Impostor Scale. The findings often highlighted that studies did not necessarily report poor psychometric properties; rather an absence of data and stringent assessment criteria resulted in lower methodological ratings. Recommendations for future research are made to address the conceptual clarification of the construct's dimensionality, to improve future study quality and to enable better discrimination between measures.
topic impostor phenomenon
impostorism
validation
measure
psychometric
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00671/full
work_keys_str_mv AT karinaklmak impostorphenomenonmeasurementscalesasystematicreview
AT sabinakleitman impostorphenomenonmeasurementscalesasystematicreview
AT mareejabbott impostorphenomenonmeasurementscalesasystematicreview
_version_ 1725074278361071616