Self-Colonizing eEurope: The Information Society Merges onto the Information Superhighway

<p>This comparative article investigates the different views of the internet—what it could do and what it was for—as they emerged in news media, popular culture, and policy in the United State and Europe before the year 2000. In the United States, the internet was imagined as an inevit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Stephanie R Schulte
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: eScholarship Publishing, University of California 2009-02-01
Series:Journal of Transnational American Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://submit.escholarship.org/ojs/index.php/acgcc_jtas/article/view/6947
id doaj-9c17e276ac5e4d03a00f79fff8c0547e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9c17e276ac5e4d03a00f79fff8c0547e2020-11-25T01:22:09ZengeScholarship Publishing, University of CaliforniaJournal of Transnational American Studies1940-07642009-02-0111Self-Colonizing eEurope: The Information Society Merges onto the Information SuperhighwayStephanie R Schulte<p>This comparative article investigates the different views of the internet—what it could do and what it was for—as they emerged in news media, popular culture, and policy in the United State and Europe before the year 2000. In the United States, the internet was imagined as an inevitability, as the domain of private corporations, and as a new frontier that would usher the United States into an era of global economic dominance. In Europe, the internet was imagined as a technological choice, as a technology subordinate to national institutions, and as a public utility that the state should provide citizens through national telecommunications corporations. Despite these differences, this article shows how, as the century concluded, the political imaginings of the internet in the two locations converged. While EU policymakers increasingly envisioned the internet as a free market and a means for global economic power, U.S. policymakers envisaged it more and more as a requirement for competent democratic citizenship. Europe "Americanized" its internet policies by increasing competition through cuts in state support for national telecommunications corporations, and the United States "Europeanized" theirs by promoting policies designed to bridge the "digital divide." Ultimately, this article shows how the internet served both as an agent of change and a discursive construction through which varying imaginings were contested. In particular, Europe's adoption of the eEurope 2005 project—an endorsement of American-style unsubsidized corporations instead of European-style statist traditions—suggests that the internet functioned as a transatlantic cultural carrier of advanced capitalism.</p>https://submit.escholarship.org/ojs/index.php/acgcc_jtas/article/view/6947InternetEuropean UnionUnited Statespopular culturepolicy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Stephanie R Schulte
spellingShingle Stephanie R Schulte
Self-Colonizing eEurope: The Information Society Merges onto the Information Superhighway
Journal of Transnational American Studies
Internet
European Union
United States
popular culture
policy
author_facet Stephanie R Schulte
author_sort Stephanie R Schulte
title Self-Colonizing eEurope: The Information Society Merges onto the Information Superhighway
title_short Self-Colonizing eEurope: The Information Society Merges onto the Information Superhighway
title_full Self-Colonizing eEurope: The Information Society Merges onto the Information Superhighway
title_fullStr Self-Colonizing eEurope: The Information Society Merges onto the Information Superhighway
title_full_unstemmed Self-Colonizing eEurope: The Information Society Merges onto the Information Superhighway
title_sort self-colonizing eeurope: the information society merges onto the information superhighway
publisher eScholarship Publishing, University of California
series Journal of Transnational American Studies
issn 1940-0764
publishDate 2009-02-01
description <p>This comparative article investigates the different views of the internet—what it could do and what it was for—as they emerged in news media, popular culture, and policy in the United State and Europe before the year 2000. In the United States, the internet was imagined as an inevitability, as the domain of private corporations, and as a new frontier that would usher the United States into an era of global economic dominance. In Europe, the internet was imagined as a technological choice, as a technology subordinate to national institutions, and as a public utility that the state should provide citizens through national telecommunications corporations. Despite these differences, this article shows how, as the century concluded, the political imaginings of the internet in the two locations converged. While EU policymakers increasingly envisioned the internet as a free market and a means for global economic power, U.S. policymakers envisaged it more and more as a requirement for competent democratic citizenship. Europe "Americanized" its internet policies by increasing competition through cuts in state support for national telecommunications corporations, and the United States "Europeanized" theirs by promoting policies designed to bridge the "digital divide." Ultimately, this article shows how the internet served both as an agent of change and a discursive construction through which varying imaginings were contested. In particular, Europe's adoption of the eEurope 2005 project—an endorsement of American-style unsubsidized corporations instead of European-style statist traditions—suggests that the internet functioned as a transatlantic cultural carrier of advanced capitalism.</p>
topic Internet
European Union
United States
popular culture
policy
url https://submit.escholarship.org/ojs/index.php/acgcc_jtas/article/view/6947
work_keys_str_mv AT stephanierschulte selfcolonizingeeuropetheinformationsocietymergesontotheinformationsuperhighway
_version_ 1725127354840252416