Comparing Reported Forest Biomass Gains and Losses in European and Global Datasets

Net <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><msub><mi>CO</mi><mn>2</mn></msub></semantics></math></inline-formula> emissions and sequestration from Europea...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lucas Sinclair, Paul Rougieux
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-02-01
Series:Forests
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/12/2/176
id doaj-9c05a8ac461c487bbcf014b91caf17bc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9c05a8ac461c487bbcf014b91caf17bc2021-02-04T00:02:02ZengMDPI AGForests1999-49072021-02-011217617610.3390/f12020176Comparing Reported Forest Biomass Gains and Losses in European and Global DatasetsLucas Sinclair0Paul Rougieux1Sinclair.Bio—Bioinformatics and Data Science Consulting, 1212 Geneva, SwitzerlandEuropean Commission, Joint Research Center (JRC), Directorate D-Sustainable Resources, Bio-Economy, Via E. Fermi 2749, I-21027 Ispra, ItalyNet <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><msub><mi>CO</mi><mn>2</mn></msub></semantics></math></inline-formula> emissions and sequestration from European forests are the result of removal and growth of flora. To arrive at aggregated measurements of these processes at a country’s level, local observations of increments and harvest rates are up-scaled to national forest areas. Each country releases these statistics through their individual National Forest Inventory using their particular definitions and methodologies. In addition, five international processes deal with the harmonization and comparability of such forest datasets in Europe, namely the IPCC, SOEF, FAOSTAT, HPFFRE, FRA (definitions follow in the article). In this study, we retrieved living biomass dynamics from each of these sources for 27 European Union member states. To demonstrate the reproducibility of our method, we release an open source python package that allows for automated data retrieval and analysis, as new data becomes available. The comparison of the published values shows discrepancies in the magnitude of forest biomass changes for several countries. In some cases, the direction of these changes also differs between sources. The scarcity of the data provided, along with the low spatial resolution, forbids the creation or calibration of a pan-European forest dynamics model, which could ultimately be used to simulate future scenarios and support policy decisions. To attain these goals, an improvement in forest data availability and harmonization is needed.https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/12/2/176data harvestingforest modelingforest growthmacroecologypublic data source comparison
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lucas Sinclair
Paul Rougieux
spellingShingle Lucas Sinclair
Paul Rougieux
Comparing Reported Forest Biomass Gains and Losses in European and Global Datasets
Forests
data harvesting
forest modeling
forest growth
macroecology
public data source comparison
author_facet Lucas Sinclair
Paul Rougieux
author_sort Lucas Sinclair
title Comparing Reported Forest Biomass Gains and Losses in European and Global Datasets
title_short Comparing Reported Forest Biomass Gains and Losses in European and Global Datasets
title_full Comparing Reported Forest Biomass Gains and Losses in European and Global Datasets
title_fullStr Comparing Reported Forest Biomass Gains and Losses in European and Global Datasets
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Reported Forest Biomass Gains and Losses in European and Global Datasets
title_sort comparing reported forest biomass gains and losses in european and global datasets
publisher MDPI AG
series Forests
issn 1999-4907
publishDate 2021-02-01
description Net <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><msub><mi>CO</mi><mn>2</mn></msub></semantics></math></inline-formula> emissions and sequestration from European forests are the result of removal and growth of flora. To arrive at aggregated measurements of these processes at a country’s level, local observations of increments and harvest rates are up-scaled to national forest areas. Each country releases these statistics through their individual National Forest Inventory using their particular definitions and methodologies. In addition, five international processes deal with the harmonization and comparability of such forest datasets in Europe, namely the IPCC, SOEF, FAOSTAT, HPFFRE, FRA (definitions follow in the article). In this study, we retrieved living biomass dynamics from each of these sources for 27 European Union member states. To demonstrate the reproducibility of our method, we release an open source python package that allows for automated data retrieval and analysis, as new data becomes available. The comparison of the published values shows discrepancies in the magnitude of forest biomass changes for several countries. In some cases, the direction of these changes also differs between sources. The scarcity of the data provided, along with the low spatial resolution, forbids the creation or calibration of a pan-European forest dynamics model, which could ultimately be used to simulate future scenarios and support policy decisions. To attain these goals, an improvement in forest data availability and harmonization is needed.
topic data harvesting
forest modeling
forest growth
macroecology
public data source comparison
url https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/12/2/176
work_keys_str_mv AT lucassinclair comparingreportedforestbiomassgainsandlossesineuropeanandglobaldatasets
AT paulrougieux comparingreportedforestbiomassgainsandlossesineuropeanandglobaldatasets
_version_ 1724285958401032192