Comparing Reported Forest Biomass Gains and Losses in European and Global Datasets
Net <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><msub><mi>CO</mi><mn>2</mn></msub></semantics></math></inline-formula> emissions and sequestration from Europea...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-02-01
|
Series: | Forests |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/12/2/176 |
id |
doaj-9c05a8ac461c487bbcf014b91caf17bc |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-9c05a8ac461c487bbcf014b91caf17bc2021-02-04T00:02:02ZengMDPI AGForests1999-49072021-02-011217617610.3390/f12020176Comparing Reported Forest Biomass Gains and Losses in European and Global DatasetsLucas Sinclair0Paul Rougieux1Sinclair.Bio—Bioinformatics and Data Science Consulting, 1212 Geneva, SwitzerlandEuropean Commission, Joint Research Center (JRC), Directorate D-Sustainable Resources, Bio-Economy, Via E. Fermi 2749, I-21027 Ispra, ItalyNet <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><msub><mi>CO</mi><mn>2</mn></msub></semantics></math></inline-formula> emissions and sequestration from European forests are the result of removal and growth of flora. To arrive at aggregated measurements of these processes at a country’s level, local observations of increments and harvest rates are up-scaled to national forest areas. Each country releases these statistics through their individual National Forest Inventory using their particular definitions and methodologies. In addition, five international processes deal with the harmonization and comparability of such forest datasets in Europe, namely the IPCC, SOEF, FAOSTAT, HPFFRE, FRA (definitions follow in the article). In this study, we retrieved living biomass dynamics from each of these sources for 27 European Union member states. To demonstrate the reproducibility of our method, we release an open source python package that allows for automated data retrieval and analysis, as new data becomes available. The comparison of the published values shows discrepancies in the magnitude of forest biomass changes for several countries. In some cases, the direction of these changes also differs between sources. The scarcity of the data provided, along with the low spatial resolution, forbids the creation or calibration of a pan-European forest dynamics model, which could ultimately be used to simulate future scenarios and support policy decisions. To attain these goals, an improvement in forest data availability and harmonization is needed.https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/12/2/176data harvestingforest modelingforest growthmacroecologypublic data source comparison |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Lucas Sinclair Paul Rougieux |
spellingShingle |
Lucas Sinclair Paul Rougieux Comparing Reported Forest Biomass Gains and Losses in European and Global Datasets Forests data harvesting forest modeling forest growth macroecology public data source comparison |
author_facet |
Lucas Sinclair Paul Rougieux |
author_sort |
Lucas Sinclair |
title |
Comparing Reported Forest Biomass Gains and Losses in European and Global Datasets |
title_short |
Comparing Reported Forest Biomass Gains and Losses in European and Global Datasets |
title_full |
Comparing Reported Forest Biomass Gains and Losses in European and Global Datasets |
title_fullStr |
Comparing Reported Forest Biomass Gains and Losses in European and Global Datasets |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparing Reported Forest Biomass Gains and Losses in European and Global Datasets |
title_sort |
comparing reported forest biomass gains and losses in european and global datasets |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Forests |
issn |
1999-4907 |
publishDate |
2021-02-01 |
description |
Net <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><msub><mi>CO</mi><mn>2</mn></msub></semantics></math></inline-formula> emissions and sequestration from European forests are the result of removal and growth of flora. To arrive at aggregated measurements of these processes at a country’s level, local observations of increments and harvest rates are up-scaled to national forest areas. Each country releases these statistics through their individual National Forest Inventory using their particular definitions and methodologies. In addition, five international processes deal with the harmonization and comparability of such forest datasets in Europe, namely the IPCC, SOEF, FAOSTAT, HPFFRE, FRA (definitions follow in the article). In this study, we retrieved living biomass dynamics from each of these sources for 27 European Union member states. To demonstrate the reproducibility of our method, we release an open source python package that allows for automated data retrieval and analysis, as new data becomes available. The comparison of the published values shows discrepancies in the magnitude of forest biomass changes for several countries. In some cases, the direction of these changes also differs between sources. The scarcity of the data provided, along with the low spatial resolution, forbids the creation or calibration of a pan-European forest dynamics model, which could ultimately be used to simulate future scenarios and support policy decisions. To attain these goals, an improvement in forest data availability and harmonization is needed. |
topic |
data harvesting forest modeling forest growth macroecology public data source comparison |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/12/2/176 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT lucassinclair comparingreportedforestbiomassgainsandlossesineuropeanandglobaldatasets AT paulrougieux comparingreportedforestbiomassgainsandlossesineuropeanandglobaldatasets |
_version_ |
1724285958401032192 |