¡ES LA POLÍTICA! EXPLICANDO LA RECENTRALIZACIÓN DE RECURSOS EN CONTEXTOS ECONÓMICOS DIVERGENTES. LOS CASOS DE BRASIL Y COLOMBIA

This paper compares a federal country, Brazil, and a centralist one, Colombia, both of which, at a given point in time, enacted a recentralization of resources despite the differences in their economies. The hypothesis is that similarities in expenditure autonomy of their intermediate-level gover...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Alejandro Angel
Format: Article
Language:Catalan
Published: Institut d'Estudis de l'Autogovern 2016-04-01
Series:Revista d'Estudis Autonòmics i Federals
Subjects:
Online Access:http://presidencia.gencat.cat/web/.content/ambits_actuacio/desenvolupament_autogovern/iea/Publicacions/REAF/REAF-articles/REAF-23-abril-2016/_reaf23_angel_.pdf
id doaj-9bf6cecb85a4408a8639709b63333652
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9bf6cecb85a4408a8639709b633336522021-03-02T03:20:02ZcatInstitut d'Estudis de l'AutogovernRevista d'Estudis Autonòmics i Federals1886-26322016-04-012016238011410.2436/20.8080.01.3¡ES LA POLÍTICA! EXPLICANDO LA RECENTRALIZACIÓN DE RECURSOS EN CONTEXTOS ECONÓMICOS DIVERGENTES. LOS CASOS DE BRASIL Y COLOMBIAAlejandro Angel0Université de MontréalThis paper compares a federal country, Brazil, and a centralist one, Colombia, both of which, at a given point in time, enacted a recentralization of resources despite the differences in their economies. The hypothesis is that similarities in expenditure autonomy of their intermediate-level governments are a consequence of changes in that direction enacted with the new Constitutions, dating back from 1991 in Colombia and from 1988 in Brazil. To test such hypothesis the paper first shows the differences in economic conditions during the 1990s in both countries after the Constitutional changes; subsequently, it shows how the previous developments within the realm of intergovernmental relations are very similar from the political point of view, allowing to understand how the loss of expenditure autonomy of intermediate-level governments during the 1990s took place. Finally, it concludes that the different economic realities of both national economies as well as those of intermediate-level governments, were subordinated to political priorities deriving from long-term processes. Debt allowed for the recentralization in both countries because of the use it was subject to.http://presidencia.gencat.cat/web/.content/ambits_actuacio/desenvolupament_autogovern/iea/Publicacions/REAF/REAF-articles/REAF-23-abril-2016/_reaf23_angel_.pdfRecentralizationBrazilColombiaconstitutionsdebt
collection DOAJ
language Catalan
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Alejandro Angel
spellingShingle Alejandro Angel
¡ES LA POLÍTICA! EXPLICANDO LA RECENTRALIZACIÓN DE RECURSOS EN CONTEXTOS ECONÓMICOS DIVERGENTES. LOS CASOS DE BRASIL Y COLOMBIA
Revista d'Estudis Autonòmics i Federals
Recentralization
Brazil
Colombia
constitutions
debt
author_facet Alejandro Angel
author_sort Alejandro Angel
title ¡ES LA POLÍTICA! EXPLICANDO LA RECENTRALIZACIÓN DE RECURSOS EN CONTEXTOS ECONÓMICOS DIVERGENTES. LOS CASOS DE BRASIL Y COLOMBIA
title_short ¡ES LA POLÍTICA! EXPLICANDO LA RECENTRALIZACIÓN DE RECURSOS EN CONTEXTOS ECONÓMICOS DIVERGENTES. LOS CASOS DE BRASIL Y COLOMBIA
title_full ¡ES LA POLÍTICA! EXPLICANDO LA RECENTRALIZACIÓN DE RECURSOS EN CONTEXTOS ECONÓMICOS DIVERGENTES. LOS CASOS DE BRASIL Y COLOMBIA
title_fullStr ¡ES LA POLÍTICA! EXPLICANDO LA RECENTRALIZACIÓN DE RECURSOS EN CONTEXTOS ECONÓMICOS DIVERGENTES. LOS CASOS DE BRASIL Y COLOMBIA
title_full_unstemmed ¡ES LA POLÍTICA! EXPLICANDO LA RECENTRALIZACIÓN DE RECURSOS EN CONTEXTOS ECONÓMICOS DIVERGENTES. LOS CASOS DE BRASIL Y COLOMBIA
title_sort ¡es la política! explicando la recentralización de recursos en contextos económicos divergentes. los casos de brasil y colombia
publisher Institut d'Estudis de l'Autogovern
series Revista d'Estudis Autonòmics i Federals
issn 1886-2632
publishDate 2016-04-01
description This paper compares a federal country, Brazil, and a centralist one, Colombia, both of which, at a given point in time, enacted a recentralization of resources despite the differences in their economies. The hypothesis is that similarities in expenditure autonomy of their intermediate-level governments are a consequence of changes in that direction enacted with the new Constitutions, dating back from 1991 in Colombia and from 1988 in Brazil. To test such hypothesis the paper first shows the differences in economic conditions during the 1990s in both countries after the Constitutional changes; subsequently, it shows how the previous developments within the realm of intergovernmental relations are very similar from the political point of view, allowing to understand how the loss of expenditure autonomy of intermediate-level governments during the 1990s took place. Finally, it concludes that the different economic realities of both national economies as well as those of intermediate-level governments, were subordinated to political priorities deriving from long-term processes. Debt allowed for the recentralization in both countries because of the use it was subject to.
topic Recentralization
Brazil
Colombia
constitutions
debt
url http://presidencia.gencat.cat/web/.content/ambits_actuacio/desenvolupament_autogovern/iea/Publicacions/REAF/REAF-articles/REAF-23-abril-2016/_reaf23_angel_.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT alejandroangel eslapoliticaexplicandolarecentralizacionderecursosencontextoseconomicosdivergentesloscasosdebrasilycolombia
_version_ 1724243744127975424