Pattern visual evoked potentials in dyslexic children

Purpose: This study aimed to compare pattern visual evoked potential (PVEP) components in dyslexic and normal children. Methods: This cross-sectional analytic study recruited 72 children, including 36 dyslexic and 36 normal participants aged 8-12 years. Visual examinations included measurement of di...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Javad Heravian Shandiz, Mohsen Heyrani, Davood Sobhani-Rad, Zeinab Salehinejad, Shirin Shojaei, Mohamad Javad Khoshsima, Abbas Azimi, Abbas Ali Yekta, Seyed Hosein Hoseini Yazdi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Knowledge E 2017-01-01
Series:Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jovr.org/article.asp?issn=2008-322X;year=2017;volume=12;issue=4;spage=402;epage=406;aulast=Shandiz
id doaj-9be7b921220a4a7a9486616222c534d7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9be7b921220a4a7a9486616222c534d72020-11-25T02:15:37ZengKnowledge EJournal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research2008-322X2017-01-0112440240610.4103/jovr.jovr_106_16Pattern visual evoked potentials in dyslexic childrenJavad Heravian ShandizMohsen HeyraniDavood Sobhani-RadZeinab SalehinejadShirin ShojaeiMohamad Javad KhoshsimaAbbas AzimiAbbas Ali YektaSeyed Hosein Hoseini YazdiPurpose: This study aimed to compare pattern visual evoked potential (PVEP) components in dyslexic and normal children. Methods: This cross-sectional analytic study recruited 72 children, including 36 dyslexic and 36 normal participants aged 8-12 years. Visual examinations included measurement of distance visual acuity, refraction, and PVEP components of amplitudes and latencies with two different check sizes of 15 and 60 minutes (min) of arc at two contrast levels of 25% and 100%. Results: Our results demonstrated significant differences between dyslexic and normal children in terms of P100 latency and amplitude of PVEP at 25% contrast, with check sizes of 15 and 60 min of arc. However, there were no significant differences between the two groups regarding P100 latency and amplitude at 100% contrast with check sizes of both 15 and 60 min of arc. Conclusion: Dyslexic participants showed reduced amplitude and prolonged latency in most PVEP components at low-contrast levels. These findings may support the magnocellular deficit hypothesis in dyslexic participants, even though the parvocellular pathway remains intact.http://www.jovr.org/article.asp?issn=2008-322X;year=2017;volume=12;issue=4;spage=402;epage=406;aulast=ShandizDyslexia; Magnocellular Pathway; Parvocellular Pathway; Visual Evoked Potential
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Javad Heravian Shandiz
Mohsen Heyrani
Davood Sobhani-Rad
Zeinab Salehinejad
Shirin Shojaei
Mohamad Javad Khoshsima
Abbas Azimi
Abbas Ali Yekta
Seyed Hosein Hoseini Yazdi
spellingShingle Javad Heravian Shandiz
Mohsen Heyrani
Davood Sobhani-Rad
Zeinab Salehinejad
Shirin Shojaei
Mohamad Javad Khoshsima
Abbas Azimi
Abbas Ali Yekta
Seyed Hosein Hoseini Yazdi
Pattern visual evoked potentials in dyslexic children
Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research
Dyslexia; Magnocellular Pathway; Parvocellular Pathway; Visual Evoked Potential
author_facet Javad Heravian Shandiz
Mohsen Heyrani
Davood Sobhani-Rad
Zeinab Salehinejad
Shirin Shojaei
Mohamad Javad Khoshsima
Abbas Azimi
Abbas Ali Yekta
Seyed Hosein Hoseini Yazdi
author_sort Javad Heravian Shandiz
title Pattern visual evoked potentials in dyslexic children
title_short Pattern visual evoked potentials in dyslexic children
title_full Pattern visual evoked potentials in dyslexic children
title_fullStr Pattern visual evoked potentials in dyslexic children
title_full_unstemmed Pattern visual evoked potentials in dyslexic children
title_sort pattern visual evoked potentials in dyslexic children
publisher Knowledge E
series Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research
issn 2008-322X
publishDate 2017-01-01
description Purpose: This study aimed to compare pattern visual evoked potential (PVEP) components in dyslexic and normal children. Methods: This cross-sectional analytic study recruited 72 children, including 36 dyslexic and 36 normal participants aged 8-12 years. Visual examinations included measurement of distance visual acuity, refraction, and PVEP components of amplitudes and latencies with two different check sizes of 15 and 60 minutes (min) of arc at two contrast levels of 25% and 100%. Results: Our results demonstrated significant differences between dyslexic and normal children in terms of P100 latency and amplitude of PVEP at 25% contrast, with check sizes of 15 and 60 min of arc. However, there were no significant differences between the two groups regarding P100 latency and amplitude at 100% contrast with check sizes of both 15 and 60 min of arc. Conclusion: Dyslexic participants showed reduced amplitude and prolonged latency in most PVEP components at low-contrast levels. These findings may support the magnocellular deficit hypothesis in dyslexic participants, even though the parvocellular pathway remains intact.
topic Dyslexia; Magnocellular Pathway; Parvocellular Pathway; Visual Evoked Potential
url http://www.jovr.org/article.asp?issn=2008-322X;year=2017;volume=12;issue=4;spage=402;epage=406;aulast=Shandiz
work_keys_str_mv AT javadheravianshandiz patternvisualevokedpotentialsindyslexicchildren
AT mohsenheyrani patternvisualevokedpotentialsindyslexicchildren
AT davoodsobhanirad patternvisualevokedpotentialsindyslexicchildren
AT zeinabsalehinejad patternvisualevokedpotentialsindyslexicchildren
AT shirinshojaei patternvisualevokedpotentialsindyslexicchildren
AT mohamadjavadkhoshsima patternvisualevokedpotentialsindyslexicchildren
AT abbasazimi patternvisualevokedpotentialsindyslexicchildren
AT abbasaliyekta patternvisualevokedpotentialsindyslexicchildren
AT seyedhoseinhoseiniyazdi patternvisualevokedpotentialsindyslexicchildren
_version_ 1724895007314280448