Le traducteur et les italiques. Omniscience et redressement dans Madame Bovary

This paper focuses on how Flaubert’s use of italics is rendered in some translated texts of Madame Bovary (English, Spanish and Catalan translations). As an emphatic device, the italics contribute to the sentence structure, just like grandiloquence does, from a rhetorical or a syntactical point of v...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sophie Sarrazin
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: Institut des Textes & Manuscrits Modernes (ITEM) 2012-11-01
Series:Flaubert: Revue Critique et Génétique
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/flaubert/1880
id doaj-9bd6445639054fce872148bf046d73c7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9bd6445639054fce872148bf046d73c72020-11-25T03:42:20ZfraInstitut des Textes & Manuscrits Modernes (ITEM)Flaubert: Revue Critique et Génétique1969-61912012-11-01Le traducteur et les italiques. Omniscience et redressement dans Madame BovarySophie SarrazinThis paper focuses on how Flaubert’s use of italics is rendered in some translated texts of Madame Bovary (English, Spanish and Catalan translations). As an emphatic device, the italics contribute to the sentence structure, just like grandiloquence does, from a rhetorical or a syntactical point of view. The large number of passages in italics in Flaubert’s novel has been discussed for a long time. Flaubert’s italics have been regularly considered as a means of pointing out the social discourse or the famous “received idea”. However, a comprehensive analysis of the occurrences shows that the function of the italics does not differ from the basic role traditionally related to this typography in the Latin alphabet languages: an invitation to read the sequence differently and, therefore, to interpret it differently too. The use of italics cannot be reduced to a specific connotative signal. Flaubert’s innovation has to be found in the collaboration required from the reader, rather than in the idea of the transformation of a graphic code. The way translators deal with the italics is, in this respect, significant. Most of them do not faithfully respect Flaubert’s choices. Within a same text, translators frequently adopt more than one solution (conservation, substitution by quotation marks or unmarking). Some passages are also rectified (in all the meanings of the word, including the etymological one) by almost every translator. As shown by J.-C. Chevalier & M.-F. Delport, such typographic variations between the original text and the translated ones, be it fortuitous or wilful, prove how powerful is what the above-mentioned scholars call “orthonymie”, i. e. the pressure of the most conventional modes of naming on the rephrasing work. In this respect, one of the characteristics of the flaubertian style, which would be the call to the reader’s contribution, is truly revealed by contrasting translations of Flaubert’s text.http://journals.openedition.org/flaubert/1880
collection DOAJ
language fra
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sophie Sarrazin
spellingShingle Sophie Sarrazin
Le traducteur et les italiques. Omniscience et redressement dans Madame Bovary
Flaubert: Revue Critique et Génétique
author_facet Sophie Sarrazin
author_sort Sophie Sarrazin
title Le traducteur et les italiques. Omniscience et redressement dans Madame Bovary
title_short Le traducteur et les italiques. Omniscience et redressement dans Madame Bovary
title_full Le traducteur et les italiques. Omniscience et redressement dans Madame Bovary
title_fullStr Le traducteur et les italiques. Omniscience et redressement dans Madame Bovary
title_full_unstemmed Le traducteur et les italiques. Omniscience et redressement dans Madame Bovary
title_sort le traducteur et les italiques. omniscience et redressement dans madame bovary
publisher Institut des Textes & Manuscrits Modernes (ITEM)
series Flaubert: Revue Critique et Génétique
issn 1969-6191
publishDate 2012-11-01
description This paper focuses on how Flaubert’s use of italics is rendered in some translated texts of Madame Bovary (English, Spanish and Catalan translations). As an emphatic device, the italics contribute to the sentence structure, just like grandiloquence does, from a rhetorical or a syntactical point of view. The large number of passages in italics in Flaubert’s novel has been discussed for a long time. Flaubert’s italics have been regularly considered as a means of pointing out the social discourse or the famous “received idea”. However, a comprehensive analysis of the occurrences shows that the function of the italics does not differ from the basic role traditionally related to this typography in the Latin alphabet languages: an invitation to read the sequence differently and, therefore, to interpret it differently too. The use of italics cannot be reduced to a specific connotative signal. Flaubert’s innovation has to be found in the collaboration required from the reader, rather than in the idea of the transformation of a graphic code. The way translators deal with the italics is, in this respect, significant. Most of them do not faithfully respect Flaubert’s choices. Within a same text, translators frequently adopt more than one solution (conservation, substitution by quotation marks or unmarking). Some passages are also rectified (in all the meanings of the word, including the etymological one) by almost every translator. As shown by J.-C. Chevalier & M.-F. Delport, such typographic variations between the original text and the translated ones, be it fortuitous or wilful, prove how powerful is what the above-mentioned scholars call “orthonymie”, i. e. the pressure of the most conventional modes of naming on the rephrasing work. In this respect, one of the characteristics of the flaubertian style, which would be the call to the reader’s contribution, is truly revealed by contrasting translations of Flaubert’s text.
url http://journals.openedition.org/flaubert/1880
work_keys_str_mv AT sophiesarrazin letraducteuretlesitaliquesomniscienceetredressementdansmadamebovary
_version_ 1724525757206626304