Effects on the Ocular Surface from Reading on Different Smartphone Screens: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study
The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of smartphone reading on the ocular surface and to compare the various effects of different screens and light conditions on the ocular surface. One hundred nineteen volunteers were randomly divided into: light + organic light‐emitting diode...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2021-05-01
|
Series: | Clinical and Translational Science |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1111/cts.12933 |
id |
doaj-9bd0586d1fcc46a688fae34ac94d07e2 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-9bd0586d1fcc46a688fae34ac94d07e22021-06-18T13:27:20ZengWileyClinical and Translational Science1752-80541752-80622021-05-0114382983610.1111/cts.12933Effects on the Ocular Surface from Reading on Different Smartphone Screens: A Prospective Randomized Controlled StudyKelan Yuan0Haiping Zhu1Yujie Mou2Yaying Wu3Jingliang He4Xiaodan Huang5Xiuming Jin6Eye Center Affiliated Second Hospital School of Medicine Zhejiang University Hangzhou ChinaEye Center Affiliated Second Hospital School of Medicine Zhejiang University Hangzhou ChinaEye Center Affiliated Second Hospital School of Medicine Zhejiang University Hangzhou ChinaEye Center Affiliated Second Hospital School of Medicine Zhejiang University Hangzhou ChinaEye Center Affiliated Second Hospital School of Medicine Zhejiang University Hangzhou ChinaEye Center Affiliated Second Hospital School of Medicine Zhejiang University Hangzhou ChinaEye Center Affiliated Second Hospital School of Medicine Zhejiang University Hangzhou ChinaThe purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of smartphone reading on the ocular surface and to compare the various effects of different screens and light conditions on the ocular surface. One hundred nineteen volunteers were randomly divided into: light + organic light‐emitting diode (OLED), light + electronic ink (eINK), dark + OLED, and dark + eINK. Ocular surface examinations, including noninvasive break‐up time (NIBUT), noninvasive keratograph tear meniscus height (NIKTMH), ocular redness, fluorescein break‐up time (FBUT), corneal fluorescein staining, meibomian gland assessment, Schirmer I Test, and blinking frequency, were performed before and after a reading task. Symptoms were evaluated using the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) and Computer Vision Syndrome Questionnaire (CVS‐Q). NIBUT and FBUT were decreased statistically significantly after participants read on an OLED screen for 2 hours compared with the baseline in light and dark environments, whereas no statistically significant decrease was observed on an eINK screen. NIKTMH was statistically significantly decreased after reading on an OLED screen in light and dark settings, and the eINK screen had a lesser effect on NIKTMH. An obvious increase in the ocular redness, OSDI and CVS‐Q scores was observed after reading on an OLED screen, whereas the eINK screen had a lesser effect on these indicators. Blink rate increased gradually in OLED subgroups during the reading task, whereas no statistically significant difference was observed in the eINK subgroups. Our research suggested that reading on an OLED screen can cause ocular surface disorder and obvious subjective discomfort, whereas reading on an eINK screen can minimize ocular surface disorder in both dark and light environments.https://doi.org/10.1111/cts.12933 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Kelan Yuan Haiping Zhu Yujie Mou Yaying Wu Jingliang He Xiaodan Huang Xiuming Jin |
spellingShingle |
Kelan Yuan Haiping Zhu Yujie Mou Yaying Wu Jingliang He Xiaodan Huang Xiuming Jin Effects on the Ocular Surface from Reading on Different Smartphone Screens: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study Clinical and Translational Science |
author_facet |
Kelan Yuan Haiping Zhu Yujie Mou Yaying Wu Jingliang He Xiaodan Huang Xiuming Jin |
author_sort |
Kelan Yuan |
title |
Effects on the Ocular Surface from Reading on Different Smartphone Screens: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study |
title_short |
Effects on the Ocular Surface from Reading on Different Smartphone Screens: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study |
title_full |
Effects on the Ocular Surface from Reading on Different Smartphone Screens: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study |
title_fullStr |
Effects on the Ocular Surface from Reading on Different Smartphone Screens: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Effects on the Ocular Surface from Reading on Different Smartphone Screens: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study |
title_sort |
effects on the ocular surface from reading on different smartphone screens: a prospective randomized controlled study |
publisher |
Wiley |
series |
Clinical and Translational Science |
issn |
1752-8054 1752-8062 |
publishDate |
2021-05-01 |
description |
The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of smartphone reading on the ocular surface and to compare the various effects of different screens and light conditions on the ocular surface. One hundred nineteen volunteers were randomly divided into: light + organic light‐emitting diode (OLED), light + electronic ink (eINK), dark + OLED, and dark + eINK. Ocular surface examinations, including noninvasive break‐up time (NIBUT), noninvasive keratograph tear meniscus height (NIKTMH), ocular redness, fluorescein break‐up time (FBUT), corneal fluorescein staining, meibomian gland assessment, Schirmer I Test, and blinking frequency, were performed before and after a reading task. Symptoms were evaluated using the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) and Computer Vision Syndrome Questionnaire (CVS‐Q). NIBUT and FBUT were decreased statistically significantly after participants read on an OLED screen for 2 hours compared with the baseline in light and dark environments, whereas no statistically significant decrease was observed on an eINK screen. NIKTMH was statistically significantly decreased after reading on an OLED screen in light and dark settings, and the eINK screen had a lesser effect on NIKTMH. An obvious increase in the ocular redness, OSDI and CVS‐Q scores was observed after reading on an OLED screen, whereas the eINK screen had a lesser effect on these indicators. Blink rate increased gradually in OLED subgroups during the reading task, whereas no statistically significant difference was observed in the eINK subgroups. Our research suggested that reading on an OLED screen can cause ocular surface disorder and obvious subjective discomfort, whereas reading on an eINK screen can minimize ocular surface disorder in both dark and light environments. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1111/cts.12933 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT kelanyuan effectsontheocularsurfacefromreadingondifferentsmartphonescreensaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT haipingzhu effectsontheocularsurfacefromreadingondifferentsmartphonescreensaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT yujiemou effectsontheocularsurfacefromreadingondifferentsmartphonescreensaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT yayingwu effectsontheocularsurfacefromreadingondifferentsmartphonescreensaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT jinglianghe effectsontheocularsurfacefromreadingondifferentsmartphonescreensaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT xiaodanhuang effectsontheocularsurfacefromreadingondifferentsmartphonescreensaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT xiumingjin effectsontheocularsurfacefromreadingondifferentsmartphonescreensaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy |
_version_ |
1721372915598884864 |