Public sphere contestation: configuration of political Islam in contemporary Indonesia

Argument in this paper draws upon Habermasian understanding of the distinction between private and public sphere. Public sphere is understood as open space that various social and cultural forces seek to define and occupy by ways of rational interests and public reason. Such attempts take place on d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Zuly Qodir
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IAIN Salatiga 2011-06-01
Series:Indonesian Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ijims.iainsalatiga.ac.id/index.php/ijims/article/view/50
id doaj-9bc7554891e74ef6bca49b934d2ae9d4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9bc7554891e74ef6bca49b934d2ae9d42020-11-24T23:06:43ZengIAIN SalatigaIndonesian Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies2089-14902406-825X2011-06-011112314910.18326/ijims.v1i1.123-14950Public sphere contestation: configuration of political Islam in contemporary IndonesiaZuly Qodir0Faculty of Social and Polit ical Science, Universitas Muhammadiyah YogyakartaArgument in this paper draws upon Habermasian understanding of the distinction between private and public sphere. Public sphere is understood as open space that various social and cultural forces seek to define and occupy by ways of rational interests and public reason. Such attempts take place on daily basis and taken by groups of different backgrounds and interests. Private sphere, in contrast, is conceived of as having domestic or individual characteristics and, more or less, non-political. It is within this framework that the continuing presence of multiple variants of political Islam in Indonesia has been a manifestation of contestation over public sphere. Diverse variants of Indonesian political Islam reveal the difference between actors and issues in the dynamics of their contention. However, evidence makes clear that variants of both political and popular Islam have been more dominant than other Islamic variants such progressive and neotraditionalist Islam. This study argues that mode of Islamic articulations in Indonesia is now more diverse as the it has developed not only in the articulatory forms of modernist, revivalist and traditionalist but also progressive, neo-traditionalist and popular Islam. Tulisan ini didasarkan pada kerangka ruang publik Jurgen Hubermas yang membedakan ruang privat dan ruang politik (publik). Ruang publik merupakan ruang yang terbuka untuk diperebutkan oleh siapa pun dan kapan pun. Sementara ruang privat merupakan ruang yang bersifat domestic (individual) tidak berdimensi politik secara dominan. Dalam persepktif semacam itu, hadirnya varian-varian Islam Indonesia merupakan bentuk kontestasi atas ruang publik yang terbuka untuk siapapun. Dari varian-varian Islam Indonesia, ada perbedaan aktor dan isu yang dikembangkan dalam kontestasi publik. Hanya saja kontestasi varian Islam politik dan popular mendapatkan ruang lebih dominan ketimbang varian Islam lain seperti progresif atau neo-tradisionalisme. Kajian ini menunjukkan bahwa Islam Indonesia tengah mengalami perkembangan format artikulasi yang sangat beragam. Islam Indonesia tidak hanya berkembang dalam format modernis, revivalis, tradisionalisme, tetapi sekaligus progresif, neo-tradisionalis dan popular Islam.http://ijims.iainsalatiga.ac.id/index.php/ijims/article/view/50Indonesian IslamVariantPublic SphereContestation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Zuly Qodir
spellingShingle Zuly Qodir
Public sphere contestation: configuration of political Islam in contemporary Indonesia
Indonesian Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies
Indonesian Islam
Variant
Public Sphere
Contestation
author_facet Zuly Qodir
author_sort Zuly Qodir
title Public sphere contestation: configuration of political Islam in contemporary Indonesia
title_short Public sphere contestation: configuration of political Islam in contemporary Indonesia
title_full Public sphere contestation: configuration of political Islam in contemporary Indonesia
title_fullStr Public sphere contestation: configuration of political Islam in contemporary Indonesia
title_full_unstemmed Public sphere contestation: configuration of political Islam in contemporary Indonesia
title_sort public sphere contestation: configuration of political islam in contemporary indonesia
publisher IAIN Salatiga
series Indonesian Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies
issn 2089-1490
2406-825X
publishDate 2011-06-01
description Argument in this paper draws upon Habermasian understanding of the distinction between private and public sphere. Public sphere is understood as open space that various social and cultural forces seek to define and occupy by ways of rational interests and public reason. Such attempts take place on daily basis and taken by groups of different backgrounds and interests. Private sphere, in contrast, is conceived of as having domestic or individual characteristics and, more or less, non-political. It is within this framework that the continuing presence of multiple variants of political Islam in Indonesia has been a manifestation of contestation over public sphere. Diverse variants of Indonesian political Islam reveal the difference between actors and issues in the dynamics of their contention. However, evidence makes clear that variants of both political and popular Islam have been more dominant than other Islamic variants such progressive and neotraditionalist Islam. This study argues that mode of Islamic articulations in Indonesia is now more diverse as the it has developed not only in the articulatory forms of modernist, revivalist and traditionalist but also progressive, neo-traditionalist and popular Islam. Tulisan ini didasarkan pada kerangka ruang publik Jurgen Hubermas yang membedakan ruang privat dan ruang politik (publik). Ruang publik merupakan ruang yang terbuka untuk diperebutkan oleh siapa pun dan kapan pun. Sementara ruang privat merupakan ruang yang bersifat domestic (individual) tidak berdimensi politik secara dominan. Dalam persepktif semacam itu, hadirnya varian-varian Islam Indonesia merupakan bentuk kontestasi atas ruang publik yang terbuka untuk siapapun. Dari varian-varian Islam Indonesia, ada perbedaan aktor dan isu yang dikembangkan dalam kontestasi publik. Hanya saja kontestasi varian Islam politik dan popular mendapatkan ruang lebih dominan ketimbang varian Islam lain seperti progresif atau neo-tradisionalisme. Kajian ini menunjukkan bahwa Islam Indonesia tengah mengalami perkembangan format artikulasi yang sangat beragam. Islam Indonesia tidak hanya berkembang dalam format modernis, revivalis, tradisionalisme, tetapi sekaligus progresif, neo-tradisionalis dan popular Islam.
topic Indonesian Islam
Variant
Public Sphere
Contestation
url http://ijims.iainsalatiga.ac.id/index.php/ijims/article/view/50
work_keys_str_mv AT zulyqodir publicspherecontestationconfigurationofpoliticalislamincontemporaryindonesia
_version_ 1725621458561925120