Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Berry Aneurysms: Quo Vadis

Background Intracranial aneurysms are vascular malformations with significant mortality and morbidity profile. Various treatment modalities have been developed to positively impact the outcome profile with gradual shift to the minimally invasive treatment modalities. Gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS)...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Manjul Tripathi, Aman Batish, Sandeep Mohindra
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd. 2021-01-01
Series:Journal of Neurosciences in Rural Practice
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0040-1716795
id doaj-9bc4ccc4c47d4c88a869b15722c9889d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9bc4ccc4c47d4c88a869b15722c9889d2021-01-29T23:40:45ZengThieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.Journal of Neurosciences in Rural Practice0976-31470976-31552021-01-01120118218410.1055/s-0040-1716795Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Berry Aneurysms: Quo VadisManjul Tripathi0Aman Batish1Sandeep Mohindra2Department of Neurosurgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, IndiaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, IndiaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, IndiaBackground Intracranial aneurysms are vascular malformations with significant mortality and morbidity profile. Various treatment modalities have been developed to positively impact the outcome profile with gradual shift to the minimally invasive treatment modalities. Gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) is an established primary treatment modality for various intracranial arteriovenous malformations (AVMs); however, its efficacy for berry aneurysmal obliteration has been historically dismal. Objective The aim of this study is to evaluate the factors responsible for poor radio surgical outcome for intracranial aneurysms. Methods The literature is reviewed for the differential efficacy of GKRS for aneurysm and AVM. Results Though both are vascular malformations, aneurysm and AVM have inherent differences in angioarchitecture, intracranial location, surrounding neighborhood, radio-sensitivity, and latency for obliteration. The major difference arises because of surrounding neighborhood of connective tissue stroma which stabilizes the irradiated pathology. Conclusion Though considered radioresistant, aneurysms show promising results with animal models of radiosurgery. The future lies in two hypothetical improvements: with a supporting neighborhood or sensitization of the vessel wall that may change the natural history of an aneurysm, especially an unruptured one.http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0040-1716795aneurysmarteriovenous malformationfistulacavernomaradiationradiosurgery
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Manjul Tripathi
Aman Batish
Sandeep Mohindra
spellingShingle Manjul Tripathi
Aman Batish
Sandeep Mohindra
Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Berry Aneurysms: Quo Vadis
Journal of Neurosciences in Rural Practice
aneurysm
arteriovenous malformation
fistula
cavernoma
radiation
radiosurgery
author_facet Manjul Tripathi
Aman Batish
Sandeep Mohindra
author_sort Manjul Tripathi
title Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Berry Aneurysms: Quo Vadis
title_short Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Berry Aneurysms: Quo Vadis
title_full Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Berry Aneurysms: Quo Vadis
title_fullStr Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Berry Aneurysms: Quo Vadis
title_full_unstemmed Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Berry Aneurysms: Quo Vadis
title_sort gamma knife radiosurgery for berry aneurysms: quo vadis
publisher Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
series Journal of Neurosciences in Rural Practice
issn 0976-3147
0976-3155
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Background Intracranial aneurysms are vascular malformations with significant mortality and morbidity profile. Various treatment modalities have been developed to positively impact the outcome profile with gradual shift to the minimally invasive treatment modalities. Gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) is an established primary treatment modality for various intracranial arteriovenous malformations (AVMs); however, its efficacy for berry aneurysmal obliteration has been historically dismal. Objective The aim of this study is to evaluate the factors responsible for poor radio surgical outcome for intracranial aneurysms. Methods The literature is reviewed for the differential efficacy of GKRS for aneurysm and AVM. Results Though both are vascular malformations, aneurysm and AVM have inherent differences in angioarchitecture, intracranial location, surrounding neighborhood, radio-sensitivity, and latency for obliteration. The major difference arises because of surrounding neighborhood of connective tissue stroma which stabilizes the irradiated pathology. Conclusion Though considered radioresistant, aneurysms show promising results with animal models of radiosurgery. The future lies in two hypothetical improvements: with a supporting neighborhood or sensitization of the vessel wall that may change the natural history of an aneurysm, especially an unruptured one.
topic aneurysm
arteriovenous malformation
fistula
cavernoma
radiation
radiosurgery
url http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0040-1716795
work_keys_str_mv AT manjultripathi gammakniferadiosurgeryforberryaneurysmsquovadis
AT amanbatish gammakniferadiosurgeryforberryaneurysmsquovadis
AT sandeepmohindra gammakniferadiosurgeryforberryaneurysmsquovadis
_version_ 1724318607027994624