What happens to quality in integrated homecare? A 15-year follow-up study

<p><strong>Objectives:</strong> To explore the impact of structural integration on homecare quality.</p><p><strong>Methods:</strong> A case study in an organisation comprising a before-after comparison with baseline and four follow-up measurements during 199...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Soili Paljärvi, Sari Rissanen, Sirkka Sinkkonen, Leo Paljärvi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ubiquity Press 2011-06-01
Series:International Journal of Integrated Care
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijic.org/index.php/ijic/article/view/571
id doaj-9bbcc924fb5b4ade97ddf8f832547603
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9bbcc924fb5b4ade97ddf8f8325476032020-11-24T21:02:53ZengUbiquity PressInternational Journal of Integrated Care1568-41562011-06-01112621What happens to quality in integrated homecare? A 15-year follow-up studySoili PaljärviSari RissanenSirkka SinkkonenLeo Paljärvi<p><strong>Objectives:</strong> To explore the impact of structural integration on homecare quality.</p><p><strong>Methods:</strong> A case study in an organisation comprising a before-after comparison with baseline and four follow-up measurements during 1994-2009, using interviews with clients (n=66-84) and postal inquiries to relatives (n=73-78) and staff (n=68-136).</p><p><strong>Results</strong>: Despite the organisational reform involving extensive mergers of health and social care organisations and cuts in staff and service provision, homecare quality remained at almost the same level throughout the 15-year follow-up. According to the clients, it even slightly improved in some homecare areas.</p><p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> The results show that despite the structural integration and cuts in staff and service provision, the quality of homecare remained at a good level. Assuming that the potential confounders did have inhibiting effects, the results suggest that structural integration had a positive impact on homecare quality. To obtain firmer evidence to support this tentative conclusion, further research with a randomised comparison design is needed.<strong> </strong></p>http://www.ijic.org/index.php/ijic/article/view/571integrated homecaremerger of health and social care organisationshomecare qualityolder people
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Soili Paljärvi
Sari Rissanen
Sirkka Sinkkonen
Leo Paljärvi
spellingShingle Soili Paljärvi
Sari Rissanen
Sirkka Sinkkonen
Leo Paljärvi
What happens to quality in integrated homecare? A 15-year follow-up study
International Journal of Integrated Care
integrated homecare
merger of health and social care organisations
homecare quality
older people
author_facet Soili Paljärvi
Sari Rissanen
Sirkka Sinkkonen
Leo Paljärvi
author_sort Soili Paljärvi
title What happens to quality in integrated homecare? A 15-year follow-up study
title_short What happens to quality in integrated homecare? A 15-year follow-up study
title_full What happens to quality in integrated homecare? A 15-year follow-up study
title_fullStr What happens to quality in integrated homecare? A 15-year follow-up study
title_full_unstemmed What happens to quality in integrated homecare? A 15-year follow-up study
title_sort what happens to quality in integrated homecare? a 15-year follow-up study
publisher Ubiquity Press
series International Journal of Integrated Care
issn 1568-4156
publishDate 2011-06-01
description <p><strong>Objectives:</strong> To explore the impact of structural integration on homecare quality.</p><p><strong>Methods:</strong> A case study in an organisation comprising a before-after comparison with baseline and four follow-up measurements during 1994-2009, using interviews with clients (n=66-84) and postal inquiries to relatives (n=73-78) and staff (n=68-136).</p><p><strong>Results</strong>: Despite the organisational reform involving extensive mergers of health and social care organisations and cuts in staff and service provision, homecare quality remained at almost the same level throughout the 15-year follow-up. According to the clients, it even slightly improved in some homecare areas.</p><p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> The results show that despite the structural integration and cuts in staff and service provision, the quality of homecare remained at a good level. Assuming that the potential confounders did have inhibiting effects, the results suggest that structural integration had a positive impact on homecare quality. To obtain firmer evidence to support this tentative conclusion, further research with a randomised comparison design is needed.<strong> </strong></p>
topic integrated homecare
merger of health and social care organisations
homecare quality
older people
url http://www.ijic.org/index.php/ijic/article/view/571
work_keys_str_mv AT soilipaljarvi whathappenstoqualityinintegratedhomecarea15yearfollowupstudy
AT saririssanen whathappenstoqualityinintegratedhomecarea15yearfollowupstudy
AT sirkkasinkkonen whathappenstoqualityinintegratedhomecarea15yearfollowupstudy
AT leopaljarvi whathappenstoqualityinintegratedhomecarea15yearfollowupstudy
_version_ 1716775039304466432