What happens to quality in integrated homecare? A 15-year follow-up study
<p><strong>Objectives:</strong> To explore the impact of structural integration on homecare quality.</p><p><strong>Methods:</strong> A case study in an organisation comprising a before-after comparison with baseline and four follow-up measurements during 199...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Ubiquity Press
2011-06-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Integrated Care |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.ijic.org/index.php/ijic/article/view/571 |
id |
doaj-9bbcc924fb5b4ade97ddf8f832547603 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-9bbcc924fb5b4ade97ddf8f8325476032020-11-24T21:02:53ZengUbiquity PressInternational Journal of Integrated Care1568-41562011-06-01112621What happens to quality in integrated homecare? A 15-year follow-up studySoili PaljärviSari RissanenSirkka SinkkonenLeo Paljärvi<p><strong>Objectives:</strong> To explore the impact of structural integration on homecare quality.</p><p><strong>Methods:</strong> A case study in an organisation comprising a before-after comparison with baseline and four follow-up measurements during 1994-2009, using interviews with clients (n=66-84) and postal inquiries to relatives (n=73-78) and staff (n=68-136).</p><p><strong>Results</strong>: Despite the organisational reform involving extensive mergers of health and social care organisations and cuts in staff and service provision, homecare quality remained at almost the same level throughout the 15-year follow-up. According to the clients, it even slightly improved in some homecare areas.</p><p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> The results show that despite the structural integration and cuts in staff and service provision, the quality of homecare remained at a good level. Assuming that the potential confounders did have inhibiting effects, the results suggest that structural integration had a positive impact on homecare quality. To obtain firmer evidence to support this tentative conclusion, further research with a randomised comparison design is needed.<strong> </strong></p>http://www.ijic.org/index.php/ijic/article/view/571integrated homecaremerger of health and social care organisationshomecare qualityolder people |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Soili Paljärvi Sari Rissanen Sirkka Sinkkonen Leo Paljärvi |
spellingShingle |
Soili Paljärvi Sari Rissanen Sirkka Sinkkonen Leo Paljärvi What happens to quality in integrated homecare? A 15-year follow-up study International Journal of Integrated Care integrated homecare merger of health and social care organisations homecare quality older people |
author_facet |
Soili Paljärvi Sari Rissanen Sirkka Sinkkonen Leo Paljärvi |
author_sort |
Soili Paljärvi |
title |
What happens to quality in integrated homecare? A 15-year follow-up study |
title_short |
What happens to quality in integrated homecare? A 15-year follow-up study |
title_full |
What happens to quality in integrated homecare? A 15-year follow-up study |
title_fullStr |
What happens to quality in integrated homecare? A 15-year follow-up study |
title_full_unstemmed |
What happens to quality in integrated homecare? A 15-year follow-up study |
title_sort |
what happens to quality in integrated homecare? a 15-year follow-up study |
publisher |
Ubiquity Press |
series |
International Journal of Integrated Care |
issn |
1568-4156 |
publishDate |
2011-06-01 |
description |
<p><strong>Objectives:</strong> To explore the impact of structural integration on homecare quality.</p><p><strong>Methods:</strong> A case study in an organisation comprising a before-after comparison with baseline and four follow-up measurements during 1994-2009, using interviews with clients (n=66-84) and postal inquiries to relatives (n=73-78) and staff (n=68-136).</p><p><strong>Results</strong>: Despite the organisational reform involving extensive mergers of health and social care organisations and cuts in staff and service provision, homecare quality remained at almost the same level throughout the 15-year follow-up. According to the clients, it even slightly improved in some homecare areas.</p><p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> The results show that despite the structural integration and cuts in staff and service provision, the quality of homecare remained at a good level. Assuming that the potential confounders did have inhibiting effects, the results suggest that structural integration had a positive impact on homecare quality. To obtain firmer evidence to support this tentative conclusion, further research with a randomised comparison design is needed.<strong> </strong></p> |
topic |
integrated homecare merger of health and social care organisations homecare quality older people |
url |
http://www.ijic.org/index.php/ijic/article/view/571 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT soilipaljarvi whathappenstoqualityinintegratedhomecarea15yearfollowupstudy AT saririssanen whathappenstoqualityinintegratedhomecarea15yearfollowupstudy AT sirkkasinkkonen whathappenstoqualityinintegratedhomecarea15yearfollowupstudy AT leopaljarvi whathappenstoqualityinintegratedhomecarea15yearfollowupstudy |
_version_ |
1716775039304466432 |