Foregrounding co-production: Building research relationships in university–community collaborative research

Emerging scholarship on university–community co-production rightly emphasizes the importance of preparatory work to build research partnerships. Such preparation creates the necessary common ground on which to build a meaningful collaborative relationship. Drawing on our experiences on a large unive...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nathan Eisenstadt, Josie McLellan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: UCL Press 2020-08-01
Series:Research for All
Online Access:https://ucl.scienceopen.com/hosted-document?doi=10.14324/RFA.04.2.08
id doaj-9b9558c5c5da4c98a891176d1a9bfa93
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9b9558c5c5da4c98a891176d1a9bfa932020-12-16T09:42:54ZengUCL PressResearch for All2399-81212020-08-0110.14324/RFA.04.2.08Foregrounding co-production: Building research relationships in university–community collaborative researchNathan EisenstadtJosie McLellanEmerging scholarship on university–community co-production rightly emphasizes the importance of preparatory work to build research partnerships. Such preparation creates the necessary common ground on which to build a meaningful collaborative relationship. Drawing on our experiences on a large university–community co-production experiment in historical mapping, we argue that this work is particularly important in partnerships where relationships are characterized by difference. If academics wish to work with individuals and groups beyond the bounds of those with whom they already agree, ‘foregrounding’ co-production is a critical component. We identify three dimensions of foregrounding co-production: practical, epistemological and affective. Each become increasingly important in cases where communities lack trust in, or actively mistrust, the university. Understanding and navigating difference, historical harm and power asymmetries can be time-intensive, and it may require a reorientation of the relationship between process and output in collaborative projects such that initially intended aims are not met. In order to encourage co-production across difference, we conclude that foregrounding should be valued as an end or ‘output’ in and of itself.https://ucl.scienceopen.com/hosted-document?doi=10.14324/RFA.04.2.08
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nathan Eisenstadt
Josie McLellan
spellingShingle Nathan Eisenstadt
Josie McLellan
Foregrounding co-production: Building research relationships in university–community collaborative research
Research for All
author_facet Nathan Eisenstadt
Josie McLellan
author_sort Nathan Eisenstadt
title Foregrounding co-production: Building research relationships in university–community collaborative research
title_short Foregrounding co-production: Building research relationships in university–community collaborative research
title_full Foregrounding co-production: Building research relationships in university–community collaborative research
title_fullStr Foregrounding co-production: Building research relationships in university–community collaborative research
title_full_unstemmed Foregrounding co-production: Building research relationships in university–community collaborative research
title_sort foregrounding co-production: building research relationships in university–community collaborative research
publisher UCL Press
series Research for All
issn 2399-8121
publishDate 2020-08-01
description Emerging scholarship on university–community co-production rightly emphasizes the importance of preparatory work to build research partnerships. Such preparation creates the necessary common ground on which to build a meaningful collaborative relationship. Drawing on our experiences on a large university–community co-production experiment in historical mapping, we argue that this work is particularly important in partnerships where relationships are characterized by difference. If academics wish to work with individuals and groups beyond the bounds of those with whom they already agree, ‘foregrounding’ co-production is a critical component. We identify three dimensions of foregrounding co-production: practical, epistemological and affective. Each become increasingly important in cases where communities lack trust in, or actively mistrust, the university. Understanding and navigating difference, historical harm and power asymmetries can be time-intensive, and it may require a reorientation of the relationship between process and output in collaborative projects such that initially intended aims are not met. In order to encourage co-production across difference, we conclude that foregrounding should be valued as an end or ‘output’ in and of itself.
url https://ucl.scienceopen.com/hosted-document?doi=10.14324/RFA.04.2.08
work_keys_str_mv AT nathaneisenstadt foregroundingcoproductionbuildingresearchrelationshipsinuniversitycommunitycollaborativeresearch
AT josiemclellan foregroundingcoproductionbuildingresearchrelationshipsinuniversitycommunitycollaborativeresearch
_version_ 1724381528016814080