Romanticism and Politics: from Heinrich Heine to Carl Schmitt – and Back Again
After a reference to the debate concerning the concept of Romanticism (Lovejoy vs Wellek), the article briefly evokes certain key stances of English and French literary Romanticism. It then points to the distinguishing features of German Romanticism, namely the enlargement of the doctrine into an in...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Institute for Neohellenic Research
2013-12-01
|
| Series: | Historical Review |
| Online Access: | https://ejournals.epublishing.ekt.gr/index.php/historicalReview/article/view/4089 |
| id |
doaj-9b816a3a963e4c78b80acf5937b19ae9 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
Article |
| spelling |
doaj-9b816a3a963e4c78b80acf5937b19ae92020-11-24T22:20:49ZengInstitute for Neohellenic Research Historical Review1790-35721791-76032013-12-0110018921810.12681/hr.3113433Romanticism and Politics: from Heinrich Heine to Carl Schmitt – and Back AgainPericles S. VallianosAfter a reference to the debate concerning the concept of Romanticism (Lovejoy vs Wellek), the article briefly evokes certain key stances of English and French literary Romanticism. It then points to the distinguishing features of German Romanticism, namely the enlargement of the doctrine into an integral metaphysics with the concept of the “organic state” at its core (A. Müller). The critique of political Romanticism by two revolutionary democrats (H. Heine and A. Ruge) is then presented. The article closes with a critique of C. Schmitt’s interpretation of political Romanticism.https://ejournals.epublishing.ekt.gr/index.php/historicalReview/article/view/4089 |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| language |
English |
| format |
Article |
| sources |
DOAJ |
| author |
Pericles S. Vallianos |
| spellingShingle |
Pericles S. Vallianos Romanticism and Politics: from Heinrich Heine to Carl Schmitt – and Back Again Historical Review |
| author_facet |
Pericles S. Vallianos |
| author_sort |
Pericles S. Vallianos |
| title |
Romanticism and Politics: from Heinrich Heine to Carl Schmitt – and Back Again |
| title_short |
Romanticism and Politics: from Heinrich Heine to Carl Schmitt – and Back Again |
| title_full |
Romanticism and Politics: from Heinrich Heine to Carl Schmitt – and Back Again |
| title_fullStr |
Romanticism and Politics: from Heinrich Heine to Carl Schmitt – and Back Again |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Romanticism and Politics: from Heinrich Heine to Carl Schmitt – and Back Again |
| title_sort |
romanticism and politics: from heinrich heine to carl schmitt – and back again |
| publisher |
Institute for Neohellenic Research |
| series |
Historical Review |
| issn |
1790-3572 1791-7603 |
| publishDate |
2013-12-01 |
| description |
After a reference to the debate concerning the concept of Romanticism (Lovejoy vs Wellek), the article briefly evokes certain key stances of English and French literary
Romanticism. It then points to the distinguishing features of German Romanticism, namely the enlargement of the doctrine into an integral metaphysics with the concept of the “organic state” at its core (A. Müller). The critique of political Romanticism by two revolutionary democrats (H. Heine and A. Ruge) is then presented. The article closes with a critique of C. Schmitt’s interpretation of political Romanticism. |
| url |
https://ejournals.epublishing.ekt.gr/index.php/historicalReview/article/view/4089 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT periclessvallianos romanticismandpoliticsfromheinrichheinetocarlschmittandbackagain |
| _version_ |
1725773739217387520 |