Die psychoanalytische Bewegung in der französischen Nachkriegsgesellschaft (1945-1953). Allianzen und Brüche

The article takes its starting point from the hypothesis that, shortly before the Second World War, a fault-line began to emerge in the French psychoanalytic movement between the supporters of a >French< school of psychoanalysis, which was heavily dependent on psychiatry, and the advoca...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Annick Ohayon
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: StudienVerlag 2003-04-01
Series:Österreichische Zeitschrift für Geschichtswissenschaften
Online Access:https://journals.univie.ac.at/index.php/oezg/article/view/5904
id doaj-9b7b75bbaa924e02ae3332ed606dff72
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9b7b75bbaa924e02ae3332ed606dff722021-03-18T20:48:08ZdeuStudienVerlagÖsterreichische Zeitschrift für Geschichtswissenschaften1016-765X2707-966X2003-04-0114210.25365/oezg-2003-14-2-5Die psychoanalytische Bewegung in der französischen Nachkriegsgesellschaft (1945-1953). Allianzen und BrücheAnnick Ohayon0Université Paris VIII The article takes its starting point from the hypothesis that, shortly before the Second World War, a fault-line began to emerge in the French psychoanalytic movement between the supporters of a >French< school of psychoanalysis, which was heavily dependent on psychiatry, and the advocates of a liberal, international, Freudian understanding of psychoanalysis. The war brought this process to a standstill. During the climate of radical change and renewal that accompanied the liberation of France, Daniel Lagache made efforts to restore the unity of the French group, using his university position and drawing on the discipline of psychology. However, this attempt was weighed down by the growing influence of Jacques Lacan's work and on-going tensions within the movement, both long-standing and of more recent origin (the war had created new problems, such as those stemming from the >collaboration< by Rene Laforgue). The author seeks to analyze this crucial moment between the liberation and the first decisive split in 1953, and emphasizes what was at stake for psychoanalysis as well as psychology. https://journals.univie.ac.at/index.php/oezg/article/view/5904
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Annick Ohayon
spellingShingle Annick Ohayon
Die psychoanalytische Bewegung in der französischen Nachkriegsgesellschaft (1945-1953). Allianzen und Brüche
Österreichische Zeitschrift für Geschichtswissenschaften
author_facet Annick Ohayon
author_sort Annick Ohayon
title Die psychoanalytische Bewegung in der französischen Nachkriegsgesellschaft (1945-1953). Allianzen und Brüche
title_short Die psychoanalytische Bewegung in der französischen Nachkriegsgesellschaft (1945-1953). Allianzen und Brüche
title_full Die psychoanalytische Bewegung in der französischen Nachkriegsgesellschaft (1945-1953). Allianzen und Brüche
title_fullStr Die psychoanalytische Bewegung in der französischen Nachkriegsgesellschaft (1945-1953). Allianzen und Brüche
title_full_unstemmed Die psychoanalytische Bewegung in der französischen Nachkriegsgesellschaft (1945-1953). Allianzen und Brüche
title_sort die psychoanalytische bewegung in der französischen nachkriegsgesellschaft (1945-1953). allianzen und brüche
publisher StudienVerlag
series Österreichische Zeitschrift für Geschichtswissenschaften
issn 1016-765X
2707-966X
publishDate 2003-04-01
description The article takes its starting point from the hypothesis that, shortly before the Second World War, a fault-line began to emerge in the French psychoanalytic movement between the supporters of a >French< school of psychoanalysis, which was heavily dependent on psychiatry, and the advocates of a liberal, international, Freudian understanding of psychoanalysis. The war brought this process to a standstill. During the climate of radical change and renewal that accompanied the liberation of France, Daniel Lagache made efforts to restore the unity of the French group, using his university position and drawing on the discipline of psychology. However, this attempt was weighed down by the growing influence of Jacques Lacan's work and on-going tensions within the movement, both long-standing and of more recent origin (the war had created new problems, such as those stemming from the >collaboration< by Rene Laforgue). The author seeks to analyze this crucial moment between the liberation and the first decisive split in 1953, and emphasizes what was at stake for psychoanalysis as well as psychology.
url https://journals.univie.ac.at/index.php/oezg/article/view/5904
work_keys_str_mv AT annickohayon diepsychoanalytischebewegunginderfranzosischennachkriegsgesellschaft19451953allianzenundbruche
_version_ 1724215170145714176