Choice of Law for Defamation, Privacy Rights and Freedom of Speech
The conflict between defamation and privacy rights on the one hand and freedom of speech on the other in international litigation is very controversial in the EU. The phenomenon, also known as libel tourism, is caused by a mixture of national and EU rules of jurisdiction, choice of law and recogniti...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Scandinavian University Press (Universitetsforlaget)
2019-01-01
|
Series: | Oslo Law Review |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.idunn.no/oslo_law_review/2019/01/choice_of_law_for_defamation_privacy_rights_and_freedom_of |
id |
doaj-9b673fa0adcc4a29825c0463c2675cd5 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-9b673fa0adcc4a29825c0463c2675cd52020-11-25T03:50:04ZengScandinavian University Press (Universitetsforlaget)Oslo Law Review2387-32992019-01-016324210.18261/issn.2387-3299-2019-01-0618948693Choice of Law for Defamation, Privacy Rights and Freedom of SpeechPeter Arnt NielsenThe conflict between defamation and privacy rights on the one hand and freedom of speech on the other in international litigation is very controversial in the EU. The phenomenon, also known as libel tourism, is caused by a mixture of national and EU rules of jurisdiction, choice of law and recognition and enforcement of judgments, even though the former and latter are harmonised by the EU. The problem is that the EU has not yet harmonised the choice-of-law rules for defamation and privacy rights. Thus, proposals for reform of the EU choice-of-law rules are discussed.https://www.idunn.no/oslo_law_review/2019/01/choice_of_law_for_defamation_privacy_rights_and_freedom_ofDefamationprivacyrightsfreedom of speechfreedomofspeech |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Peter Arnt Nielsen |
spellingShingle |
Peter Arnt Nielsen Choice of Law for Defamation, Privacy Rights and Freedom of Speech Oslo Law Review Defamation privacy rights freedom of speech freedomofspeech |
author_facet |
Peter Arnt Nielsen |
author_sort |
Peter Arnt Nielsen |
title |
Choice of Law for Defamation, Privacy Rights and Freedom of Speech |
title_short |
Choice of Law for Defamation, Privacy Rights and Freedom of Speech |
title_full |
Choice of Law for Defamation, Privacy Rights and Freedom of Speech |
title_fullStr |
Choice of Law for Defamation, Privacy Rights and Freedom of Speech |
title_full_unstemmed |
Choice of Law for Defamation, Privacy Rights and Freedom of Speech |
title_sort |
choice of law for defamation, privacy rights and freedom of speech |
publisher |
Scandinavian University Press (Universitetsforlaget) |
series |
Oslo Law Review |
issn |
2387-3299 |
publishDate |
2019-01-01 |
description |
The conflict between defamation and privacy rights on the one hand and freedom of speech on the other in international litigation is very controversial in the EU. The phenomenon, also known as libel tourism, is caused by a mixture of national and EU rules of jurisdiction, choice of law and recognition and enforcement of judgments, even though the former and latter are harmonised by the EU. The problem is that the EU has not yet harmonised the choice-of-law rules for defamation and privacy rights. Thus, proposals for reform of the EU choice-of-law rules are discussed. |
topic |
Defamation privacy rights freedom of speech freedomofspeech |
url |
https://www.idunn.no/oslo_law_review/2019/01/choice_of_law_for_defamation_privacy_rights_and_freedom_of |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT peterarntnielsen choiceoflawfordefamationprivacyrightsandfreedomofspeech |
_version_ |
1724492552686534656 |