A comparison of direct laryngoscopy versus videolaryngoscopy using aerosol box for intubation in emergency surgeries during Covid-19 pandemic: A pilot study

Background and Aims: This study was planned to compare intubating conditions with aerosol box, while attempting intubation with either direct laryngoscope (DL) using Macintosh blade or McGrath MAC™, videolaryngoscope (VL). Methodology: Sixty adult patients coming for the emergency surgeries during C...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Deepak Dwivedi, Parmeet Bhatia, Manish Aggarwal, Subrato Sen, Bhavna Hooda, Puja Dudeja
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2020-01-01
Series:Journal of Marine Medical Society
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.marinemedicalsociety.in/article.asp?issn=0975-3605;year=2020;volume=22;issue=3;spage=88;epage=92;aulast=Dwivedi
id doaj-9b617373e1b0489393917167f0d7011c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9b617373e1b0489393917167f0d7011c2021-02-03T07:01:33ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Marine Medical Society0975-36052020-01-01223889210.4103/jmms.jmms_100_20A comparison of direct laryngoscopy versus videolaryngoscopy using aerosol box for intubation in emergency surgeries during Covid-19 pandemic: A pilot studyDeepak DwivediParmeet BhatiaManish AggarwalSubrato SenBhavna HoodaPuja DudejaBackground and Aims: This study was planned to compare intubating conditions with aerosol box, while attempting intubation with either direct laryngoscope (DL) using Macintosh blade or McGrath MAC™, videolaryngoscope (VL). Methodology: Sixty adult patients coming for the emergency surgeries during COVID-19 pandemic were divided equally by consecutive sampling into either Group 1 (DL) or Group 2 (VL). General anesthesia was administered with aerosol box covering the head and trunk of the patient. The laryngoscopy was attempted based on the group allocation with either VL or DL through aerosol box. Following observations were noted, total intubation time, number of attempts, Cormack–Lehane (CL) view, intubation difficulty scale (IDS), use of airway adjuncts, and external laryngeal maneuver. Results: Mean (standard deviation) time taken to intubate was 25.36 (6.22) sec in DL group and 21.9 (5.56) sec in VL group. Median IDS scoring was 1 in DL group and 0 in VL group indicating toward ease of intubation with the videolaryngoscope. Improved glottic view (CL Grade 1) was attained commonly with VL group and higher CL grades (2b) were common with DL group (23.3%). No intubation aids were required in VL group although 30% in DL required bougie for the intubation. External laryngeal maneuver was applied in 40% subjects undergoing DL with no maneuvers needed in VL group. First pass success of intubation was comparable in both the groups. Conclusion: Intubating conditions are favorable with VL when aerosol box is included which requires acquisition of the skills depending on its availability. However, the intubation should be attempted with the technique the clinician has the expertise during this pandemic.http://www.marinemedicalsociety.in/article.asp?issn=0975-3605;year=2020;volume=22;issue=3;spage=88;epage=92;aulast=Dwivediairway managementcovid-19endotracheal intubationlaryngoscopypandemicpersonal protective clothing
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Deepak Dwivedi
Parmeet Bhatia
Manish Aggarwal
Subrato Sen
Bhavna Hooda
Puja Dudeja
spellingShingle Deepak Dwivedi
Parmeet Bhatia
Manish Aggarwal
Subrato Sen
Bhavna Hooda
Puja Dudeja
A comparison of direct laryngoscopy versus videolaryngoscopy using aerosol box for intubation in emergency surgeries during Covid-19 pandemic: A pilot study
Journal of Marine Medical Society
airway management
covid-19
endotracheal intubation
laryngoscopy
pandemic
personal protective clothing
author_facet Deepak Dwivedi
Parmeet Bhatia
Manish Aggarwal
Subrato Sen
Bhavna Hooda
Puja Dudeja
author_sort Deepak Dwivedi
title A comparison of direct laryngoscopy versus videolaryngoscopy using aerosol box for intubation in emergency surgeries during Covid-19 pandemic: A pilot study
title_short A comparison of direct laryngoscopy versus videolaryngoscopy using aerosol box for intubation in emergency surgeries during Covid-19 pandemic: A pilot study
title_full A comparison of direct laryngoscopy versus videolaryngoscopy using aerosol box for intubation in emergency surgeries during Covid-19 pandemic: A pilot study
title_fullStr A comparison of direct laryngoscopy versus videolaryngoscopy using aerosol box for intubation in emergency surgeries during Covid-19 pandemic: A pilot study
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of direct laryngoscopy versus videolaryngoscopy using aerosol box for intubation in emergency surgeries during Covid-19 pandemic: A pilot study
title_sort comparison of direct laryngoscopy versus videolaryngoscopy using aerosol box for intubation in emergency surgeries during covid-19 pandemic: a pilot study
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Journal of Marine Medical Society
issn 0975-3605
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Background and Aims: This study was planned to compare intubating conditions with aerosol box, while attempting intubation with either direct laryngoscope (DL) using Macintosh blade or McGrath MAC™, videolaryngoscope (VL). Methodology: Sixty adult patients coming for the emergency surgeries during COVID-19 pandemic were divided equally by consecutive sampling into either Group 1 (DL) or Group 2 (VL). General anesthesia was administered with aerosol box covering the head and trunk of the patient. The laryngoscopy was attempted based on the group allocation with either VL or DL through aerosol box. Following observations were noted, total intubation time, number of attempts, Cormack–Lehane (CL) view, intubation difficulty scale (IDS), use of airway adjuncts, and external laryngeal maneuver. Results: Mean (standard deviation) time taken to intubate was 25.36 (6.22) sec in DL group and 21.9 (5.56) sec in VL group. Median IDS scoring was 1 in DL group and 0 in VL group indicating toward ease of intubation with the videolaryngoscope. Improved glottic view (CL Grade 1) was attained commonly with VL group and higher CL grades (2b) were common with DL group (23.3%). No intubation aids were required in VL group although 30% in DL required bougie for the intubation. External laryngeal maneuver was applied in 40% subjects undergoing DL with no maneuvers needed in VL group. First pass success of intubation was comparable in both the groups. Conclusion: Intubating conditions are favorable with VL when aerosol box is included which requires acquisition of the skills depending on its availability. However, the intubation should be attempted with the technique the clinician has the expertise during this pandemic.
topic airway management
covid-19
endotracheal intubation
laryngoscopy
pandemic
personal protective clothing
url http://www.marinemedicalsociety.in/article.asp?issn=0975-3605;year=2020;volume=22;issue=3;spage=88;epage=92;aulast=Dwivedi
work_keys_str_mv AT deepakdwivedi acomparisonofdirectlaryngoscopyversusvideolaryngoscopyusingaerosolboxforintubationinemergencysurgeriesduringcovid19pandemicapilotstudy
AT parmeetbhatia acomparisonofdirectlaryngoscopyversusvideolaryngoscopyusingaerosolboxforintubationinemergencysurgeriesduringcovid19pandemicapilotstudy
AT manishaggarwal acomparisonofdirectlaryngoscopyversusvideolaryngoscopyusingaerosolboxforintubationinemergencysurgeriesduringcovid19pandemicapilotstudy
AT subratosen acomparisonofdirectlaryngoscopyversusvideolaryngoscopyusingaerosolboxforintubationinemergencysurgeriesduringcovid19pandemicapilotstudy
AT bhavnahooda acomparisonofdirectlaryngoscopyversusvideolaryngoscopyusingaerosolboxforintubationinemergencysurgeriesduringcovid19pandemicapilotstudy
AT pujadudeja acomparisonofdirectlaryngoscopyversusvideolaryngoscopyusingaerosolboxforintubationinemergencysurgeriesduringcovid19pandemicapilotstudy
AT deepakdwivedi comparisonofdirectlaryngoscopyversusvideolaryngoscopyusingaerosolboxforintubationinemergencysurgeriesduringcovid19pandemicapilotstudy
AT parmeetbhatia comparisonofdirectlaryngoscopyversusvideolaryngoscopyusingaerosolboxforintubationinemergencysurgeriesduringcovid19pandemicapilotstudy
AT manishaggarwal comparisonofdirectlaryngoscopyversusvideolaryngoscopyusingaerosolboxforintubationinemergencysurgeriesduringcovid19pandemicapilotstudy
AT subratosen comparisonofdirectlaryngoscopyversusvideolaryngoscopyusingaerosolboxforintubationinemergencysurgeriesduringcovid19pandemicapilotstudy
AT bhavnahooda comparisonofdirectlaryngoscopyversusvideolaryngoscopyusingaerosolboxforintubationinemergencysurgeriesduringcovid19pandemicapilotstudy
AT pujadudeja comparisonofdirectlaryngoscopyversusvideolaryngoscopyusingaerosolboxforintubationinemergencysurgeriesduringcovid19pandemicapilotstudy
_version_ 1724288492697026560