A comparison of direct laryngoscopy versus videolaryngoscopy using aerosol box for intubation in emergency surgeries during Covid-19 pandemic: A pilot study
Background and Aims: This study was planned to compare intubating conditions with aerosol box, while attempting intubation with either direct laryngoscope (DL) using Macintosh blade or McGrath MAC™, videolaryngoscope (VL). Methodology: Sixty adult patients coming for the emergency surgeries during C...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2020-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Marine Medical Society |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.marinemedicalsociety.in/article.asp?issn=0975-3605;year=2020;volume=22;issue=3;spage=88;epage=92;aulast=Dwivedi |
id |
doaj-9b617373e1b0489393917167f0d7011c |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-9b617373e1b0489393917167f0d7011c2021-02-03T07:01:33ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Marine Medical Society0975-36052020-01-01223889210.4103/jmms.jmms_100_20A comparison of direct laryngoscopy versus videolaryngoscopy using aerosol box for intubation in emergency surgeries during Covid-19 pandemic: A pilot studyDeepak DwivediParmeet BhatiaManish AggarwalSubrato SenBhavna HoodaPuja DudejaBackground and Aims: This study was planned to compare intubating conditions with aerosol box, while attempting intubation with either direct laryngoscope (DL) using Macintosh blade or McGrath MAC™, videolaryngoscope (VL). Methodology: Sixty adult patients coming for the emergency surgeries during COVID-19 pandemic were divided equally by consecutive sampling into either Group 1 (DL) or Group 2 (VL). General anesthesia was administered with aerosol box covering the head and trunk of the patient. The laryngoscopy was attempted based on the group allocation with either VL or DL through aerosol box. Following observations were noted, total intubation time, number of attempts, Cormack–Lehane (CL) view, intubation difficulty scale (IDS), use of airway adjuncts, and external laryngeal maneuver. Results: Mean (standard deviation) time taken to intubate was 25.36 (6.22) sec in DL group and 21.9 (5.56) sec in VL group. Median IDS scoring was 1 in DL group and 0 in VL group indicating toward ease of intubation with the videolaryngoscope. Improved glottic view (CL Grade 1) was attained commonly with VL group and higher CL grades (2b) were common with DL group (23.3%). No intubation aids were required in VL group although 30% in DL required bougie for the intubation. External laryngeal maneuver was applied in 40% subjects undergoing DL with no maneuvers needed in VL group. First pass success of intubation was comparable in both the groups. Conclusion: Intubating conditions are favorable with VL when aerosol box is included which requires acquisition of the skills depending on its availability. However, the intubation should be attempted with the technique the clinician has the expertise during this pandemic.http://www.marinemedicalsociety.in/article.asp?issn=0975-3605;year=2020;volume=22;issue=3;spage=88;epage=92;aulast=Dwivediairway managementcovid-19endotracheal intubationlaryngoscopypandemicpersonal protective clothing |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Deepak Dwivedi Parmeet Bhatia Manish Aggarwal Subrato Sen Bhavna Hooda Puja Dudeja |
spellingShingle |
Deepak Dwivedi Parmeet Bhatia Manish Aggarwal Subrato Sen Bhavna Hooda Puja Dudeja A comparison of direct laryngoscopy versus videolaryngoscopy using aerosol box for intubation in emergency surgeries during Covid-19 pandemic: A pilot study Journal of Marine Medical Society airway management covid-19 endotracheal intubation laryngoscopy pandemic personal protective clothing |
author_facet |
Deepak Dwivedi Parmeet Bhatia Manish Aggarwal Subrato Sen Bhavna Hooda Puja Dudeja |
author_sort |
Deepak Dwivedi |
title |
A comparison of direct laryngoscopy versus videolaryngoscopy using aerosol box for intubation in emergency surgeries during Covid-19 pandemic: A pilot study |
title_short |
A comparison of direct laryngoscopy versus videolaryngoscopy using aerosol box for intubation in emergency surgeries during Covid-19 pandemic: A pilot study |
title_full |
A comparison of direct laryngoscopy versus videolaryngoscopy using aerosol box for intubation in emergency surgeries during Covid-19 pandemic: A pilot study |
title_fullStr |
A comparison of direct laryngoscopy versus videolaryngoscopy using aerosol box for intubation in emergency surgeries during Covid-19 pandemic: A pilot study |
title_full_unstemmed |
A comparison of direct laryngoscopy versus videolaryngoscopy using aerosol box for intubation in emergency surgeries during Covid-19 pandemic: A pilot study |
title_sort |
comparison of direct laryngoscopy versus videolaryngoscopy using aerosol box for intubation in emergency surgeries during covid-19 pandemic: a pilot study |
publisher |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
series |
Journal of Marine Medical Society |
issn |
0975-3605 |
publishDate |
2020-01-01 |
description |
Background and Aims: This study was planned to compare intubating conditions with aerosol box, while attempting intubation with either direct laryngoscope (DL) using Macintosh blade or McGrath MAC™, videolaryngoscope (VL). Methodology: Sixty adult patients coming for the emergency surgeries during COVID-19 pandemic were divided equally by consecutive sampling into either Group 1 (DL) or Group 2 (VL). General anesthesia was administered with aerosol box covering the head and trunk of the patient. The laryngoscopy was attempted based on the group allocation with either VL or DL through aerosol box. Following observations were noted, total intubation time, number of attempts, Cormack–Lehane (CL) view, intubation difficulty scale (IDS), use of airway adjuncts, and external laryngeal maneuver. Results: Mean (standard deviation) time taken to intubate was 25.36 (6.22) sec in DL group and 21.9 (5.56) sec in VL group. Median IDS scoring was 1 in DL group and 0 in VL group indicating toward ease of intubation with the videolaryngoscope. Improved glottic view (CL Grade 1) was attained commonly with VL group and higher CL grades (2b) were common with DL group (23.3%). No intubation aids were required in VL group although 30% in DL required bougie for the intubation. External laryngeal maneuver was applied in 40% subjects undergoing DL with no maneuvers needed in VL group. First pass success of intubation was comparable in both the groups. Conclusion: Intubating conditions are favorable with VL when aerosol box is included which requires acquisition of the skills depending on its availability. However, the intubation should be attempted with the technique the clinician has the expertise during this pandemic. |
topic |
airway management covid-19 endotracheal intubation laryngoscopy pandemic personal protective clothing |
url |
http://www.marinemedicalsociety.in/article.asp?issn=0975-3605;year=2020;volume=22;issue=3;spage=88;epage=92;aulast=Dwivedi |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT deepakdwivedi acomparisonofdirectlaryngoscopyversusvideolaryngoscopyusingaerosolboxforintubationinemergencysurgeriesduringcovid19pandemicapilotstudy AT parmeetbhatia acomparisonofdirectlaryngoscopyversusvideolaryngoscopyusingaerosolboxforintubationinemergencysurgeriesduringcovid19pandemicapilotstudy AT manishaggarwal acomparisonofdirectlaryngoscopyversusvideolaryngoscopyusingaerosolboxforintubationinemergencysurgeriesduringcovid19pandemicapilotstudy AT subratosen acomparisonofdirectlaryngoscopyversusvideolaryngoscopyusingaerosolboxforintubationinemergencysurgeriesduringcovid19pandemicapilotstudy AT bhavnahooda acomparisonofdirectlaryngoscopyversusvideolaryngoscopyusingaerosolboxforintubationinemergencysurgeriesduringcovid19pandemicapilotstudy AT pujadudeja acomparisonofdirectlaryngoscopyversusvideolaryngoscopyusingaerosolboxforintubationinemergencysurgeriesduringcovid19pandemicapilotstudy AT deepakdwivedi comparisonofdirectlaryngoscopyversusvideolaryngoscopyusingaerosolboxforintubationinemergencysurgeriesduringcovid19pandemicapilotstudy AT parmeetbhatia comparisonofdirectlaryngoscopyversusvideolaryngoscopyusingaerosolboxforintubationinemergencysurgeriesduringcovid19pandemicapilotstudy AT manishaggarwal comparisonofdirectlaryngoscopyversusvideolaryngoscopyusingaerosolboxforintubationinemergencysurgeriesduringcovid19pandemicapilotstudy AT subratosen comparisonofdirectlaryngoscopyversusvideolaryngoscopyusingaerosolboxforintubationinemergencysurgeriesduringcovid19pandemicapilotstudy AT bhavnahooda comparisonofdirectlaryngoscopyversusvideolaryngoscopyusingaerosolboxforintubationinemergencysurgeriesduringcovid19pandemicapilotstudy AT pujadudeja comparisonofdirectlaryngoscopyversusvideolaryngoscopyusingaerosolboxforintubationinemergencysurgeriesduringcovid19pandemicapilotstudy |
_version_ |
1724288492697026560 |